Global Warming Hoax destroyed by Nobel Laureate


 Global Warming Hoax destroyed by Nobel Laureate

Global Warming Hoax was invented for a reason? Let’s find out what that reason might be. 

Close to 32,000 scientists signed this petition stating that the Global warming story line is total rubbish.  Mass psychology clearly illustrates that if the masses believe in something, that one should approach that topic with caution. Translation; if the masses accept something like the Gospel; the odds state that the storyline is likely to be flawed.  TheGlobal Warming Hoax is nothing but a scam perpetrated by the elite to rob the poor.

Dr Ivar Giaever, a Nobel Prize-Winner for physics in 1973 states that Global warming is a non-problem.

Global Warming Hoax invented to bilk the average citizen 

If scientists don’t believe in this hypothesis, and they have the credentials to understand the theory behind these claims, then logic dictates that a rational individual should take the same route.  The main players here are corporations and politicians.  Politicians are nothing but paid corporate prostitutes, therefore, the only time you can trust these two groups is when their lips are not moving.  This Video reveals the depth of the Global Warming Hoax, and the length governments will go to serve their higher masters: these master lie in the shadows.

Global Warming Hoax;  several scientists debunk the Global Warming Theory 

As Dr Richard Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, observed, NAS President Ralph Cicerone is really saying that “…regardless of evidence the answer is predetermined. If government wants carbon control, that is the answer that the Academies will provide.”

21st century changes are neither exceptional or persistent, and the historical and geological records show many periods warmer than today. Also, there is an extensive literature that examines beneficial effects of increased levels of carbon dioxide in both animals and plants.

While real polling of climate scientists and organization memberships is rare, there are a few examples. A 2008 international survey of climate scientists conducted by German scientists Dennis Bray and Hans von Storch revealed deep disagreement regarding two-thirds of the 54 questions asked about their professional views. Responses to about half of those areas were skewed on the “skeptic” side, with no consensus to support any alarm. The majority did not believe that atmospheric models can deal with important influences of clouds, precipitation, atmospheric convection, ocean convection, or turbulence. Most also did not believe that climate models can predict precipitation, sea level rise, extreme weather events, or temperature values for the next 50 year. Full Story

Global Warming Hoax Game Plan 

As a result of this push to prevent global warming, many sectors have taken it to the chin. Consequently, sectors such as coal could make for a great long-term investments as a result of the Global Warming Hoax ploy. Coal consumption is not going to drop; Asia will continue to embrace coal as its cheap and new coal plants are almost as efficient as nuclear power stations. Contrarian investors can take advantage of the Global Warming Hoax to get into some energy stocks at rock bottom prices.

List of coal stocks to buy to take advantage of the Global Warming Hoax


Other related Articles 

Looting Made Easy; Corporate Share Buybacks Keeping Dow Bull Alive  (March 19)

Foreign Governments Dumping Record Amount of US debt   (March 18)

US Congress losing mind over Russian Arms Sales to Iran (March 17)

Russian economy improving; Inflation down over 50% (March 17)

Fed’s change of Heart Could trigger strong Rally in 2016  (March 17)

seeking perfection Recipe for Financial Tragedy (March 16)



Paul Swann

“Tags: Global warming nothing but a scam to lower Oxygen supplies in the atmosphere,”

Congratulations on producing the most idiotic tag of the decade!

See my comments here:

Dr Ivar Giaever is a science advisor at the notorious far right Heartland Institute. This is the same organisation who worked with the tobacco company Philip Morris to deny the health risks of secondhand smoke and to lobby against smoking bans as they now do against climate change.

The link to that fake petition is thankfully dead like many of the fossils who supported it, along with “Drs. ‘Frank Burns’ ‘Honeycutt’ and ‘Pierce’ from the hit-show M*A*S*H and Spice Girls, a.k.a. Geraldine Halliwell, who was on the petition as ‘Dr. Geri Halliwel’ and again as simply ‘Dr. Halliwell.’ “

The unscrupulous politicians and minority of scientists who support this filthy industry are the real prostitutes.

Your links don’t work. This video is full of nothing. Why do this to yourself..?

Guy, climate change studies start with recognition from our own military dating back to the 40s’, please do try again.

Tactical Investor

You should dig deeper and understand the scope of the hoax. Climate change is a normal phenomenon and not the global warming hoax pushed by government. It’s due to changes in the earth;s magnetic field. Once upon a time the Sahara desert was a lush forest; are you going to say the garbage the government is pushing is what caused the Sahara to change. Hint there were no cars back then.

And our military has been involved in so many illegal attempts to overthrow democratically elected governments under the guise of fighting terrorism or some other nonsense so anyone with a grain of sense is not going to believe what this disingenuous institutions lays claim to. Independent scientists are the ones that provide the real data; the rest are just paid servants.

Tactical Investor

The video reveals a lot if you take the time to listen. However, we provided a second video and this guy is another educated scientists who provides simple common sense proof that Global Warming is nothing but rubbish.

The link issue has been fixed it was a minor glitch, additional characters were being added to the link so it was coming back as denied.

Again dig deeper stop buying the liberal rubbish that is being forced down your throat.

Lastly, we are not forcing anything down anyone’s throat, we are providing food for thought. Last time we checked this was still a free country, which means you have the option and right to disagree as do we

Tactical Investor

The other scientists are notorious backers of the leftist agenda who seek to charge humanity for everything. Where do you think the stupid idea of A carbon tax came from. Anything that is not part of mainstream is always classified as far right. He won a noble Laureate, those things don’t full on your lap unless you are Obama

It has always been easy enough to know that Global Warming was a hoax. All that is required is an understanding of human nature and a little bit of skepticism.

If global warming were really happening, there would be some negative results, but there would be positive ones too. Land that is now useless would become arable. Growing seasons would lengthen. Less resources would be required for winter heating.

But the Warmies never tell you any of that, do they? They paint the picture in the only negative terms and those in the most catastrophic way possible – and if you understand human nature, that should tell you something.

It tells you there is a place they want you to go – a conclusion they want you to reach – and they know if they tell you the whole story, you might not go there. Hoax.

And then we have the fraudulent data. They’ve been caught several times faking the “data” that they like to beat you over the head with. But each time they’re caught, they only insist even more stridently than before that their hoax is real.

If you learn anything from the great hoax, which is undoubtedly the most expensive con game in human history, learn this: scientists are no more immune to corruption, deceit, and coercion than any other group of people.

Finally, I’ll point out that the history of scientific advance is not a history of consensus – far from it. It would be more accurate to say that science is advanced by a few people working against the consensus – finding new things – and then eventually being accepted and adopted by the “scientific community.”

Any scientific finding that relies on “consensus” for its authority is very likely a hoax – or at least an error.

I have added those video links to my notepad ap to be shown to anyone that needs to be educated on the science and shown what intelligent debate of the scientific results does to completely destroy the global warming movement.

FYI – Skepticism (testing theory) = Science. Proving/Defending theory = ADVOCACY. Consensus = Herd Think. Argumentum ad hominem = a Liberal art form. Projection = Libt2rdism. Sorry, but there it is.

Do not fear. Liberals will not be influenced by this. It’s eyes wide shut all the way down.

Hex, climate has been changing without let up since Earth was a clog of swirling dust and gas dancing around a protostar. It has never stopped changing. It never will stop changing until stasis is achieved. Stasis is the end of time. Your love of “controlism,” however, is adorable. If you wish to learn something, start with a null hypothesis, construct and conduct a study, collect the data (ALL of it) and make a report. Listen to critique. Rinse and repeat. If you wish to prove a thing, start with your favorite conclusion and back-fill your chosen facts accordingly. Eyes wide shut always wins the day — easier, no?

Libs confront the world as a very very old man, mind closed and fly wide open. Give this fool’s errand up. He ain’t gonna get it. Capisce?

Doesn’t your premise begin with the idea of experimentation? Like the experimentation multiple organizations and thousands of scientists have been doing for decades regarding our climate? Your side is backed up by headlines, mine, my data. Try again though, but come stronger next time.

Goodness man. Its so sad to see good hard working people have the wool pulled so tightly over their eyes by corporations. Think of it this way and maybe something will click. Beijing is a city in China right? That city is polluted right? That city is a little eco-system influenced by pollution, that pollution gets trapped and causes the air to become poisonous and not suitable for life. Therefore they try and limit that pollution to make the air easier to breathe and more suitable for life. Think of the earth like a little city within the world of our solar system…theeerrreeee we go, the light bulbs are starting to come on I can feel it Tac! I can feel it!

Reading comprehension probably isn’t your strongest asset. My premise is that you seek control over knowledge. Please show me the data that Earth did not coalesce from a primordial cloud, that Earth has not cooled and warmed ceaselessly ever since, that frauds like Michael Mann did not hide data that did not PROVE his “theory,” that change will not stop however feverish your controllist wet dreams may be. Projection always becomes the Libt2rd – it’s you and your fake news that suck at the headline teat while you slavishly back fill to prove a theory. You are too lazy, apparently, to do a real study, so just grab the facts you like and fling them where you think they may influence your favorite low-information folk the most. Looking forward to your, uh, data.

Projection again. You must have a degree in cinematography. Annoying, yet fun to watch all the same, Wooly.

Do you have a video of a scientist speaking (I think) at the Heritage Foundation about how (and I may remember it wrong) scientists don’t care for the publicity and are happiest being left alone with their projects and then goes on to tell about how the petition was sent around for original signatures of scientists all over the world? I watched this video once and loved that speech and then never could find it again.


No, I don’t have that one, but will look for it. Sounds interesting. Thanks!!


I’m not convinced of this. I think anyone on the other side of the global warming argument can at least be brought to the point of understanding where our side is coming from. The way it is now with all of the misrepresentation of our opinion, most of them don’t even understand what our opinion is. So, you are correct about them not listening, and this whole topic is about getting them to listen to the common sense formed opinions that we have after looking of ALL the scientific results. If you go at a man-made climate-change believer with the attitude that they are stupid, that will go nowhere. If you can get them to discuss the results and what they mean, that is when you might have a chance to get them to see the light. They first need to understand that us deniers don’t deny that the climate is changing. The difference of opinion is whether man’s activities are making the climate change in abnormal ways. I’ve seen no evidence of that at all. We are simply saying that the earth’s climate has been changing since the first days it was formed. The earth has had ice ages, prolonged hot periods with droughts, prolonged wet periods resulting in floods, earthquakes, etc, and those were thousands of years before man started using fossil fuels. The earth’s climate is always changing, and to put people out of work and destroy a cheap energy producing industry due to the climate change, we need to be 100% sure that it’s for a damn good reason. That science had better be 100% certain. The evidence needs to be overwhelming and undeniable, and that is not the case with climate science. Just look at how they had to change from global warming to climate change after the results showed that the warming period stopped. That is the kind of stuff you do when your theory completely falls apart.