Unlocking the Mystery: Inductive vs Deductive Reasoning
Unlocking the Mystery: Inductive vs Deductive Reasoning

Unlocking the Mystery: Inductive vs Deductive Reasoning

Inductive vs Deductive reasoning

Updated Jan 2023

The Power of Perception: Inductive vs Deductive Reasoning

In a world where information is readily available at our fingertips, it’s crucial to develop a critical eye when evaluating the accuracy and validity of data. Inductive thinking teaches us to scrutinize the information that is presented to us and not to accept anything as fact without examination. With this method of analysis, we can break down data and analyze it through a new lens, effectively reducing the amount of flawed information that enters into our analysis.

Gone are the days of blindly accepting raw data, as inductive thinking requires a more objective approach to information evaluation. Government data, in particular, is known to be manipulated.  Even the most respected sources may provide flawed information. That’s why it’s essential to look at raw data objectively and make informed decisions on its use in our analysis.

By adopting inductive thinking, we can enhance the quality of our analysis and make more informed decisions. This method teaches us to challenge assumptions and embrace a more sceptical approach to information evaluation, ultimately leading to a more accurate and effective analysis. So embrace a new approach to data analysis and experience the transformative power of inductive thinking.

A Path to Fresh Insights: The Benefits of Inductive Reasoning

In the world of investing and personal growth, the principles of Mass Psychology can often seem daunting. However, by combining the power of both inductive and deductive reasoning, we can deepen our understanding of these principles and apply them to bring real benefits to our lives.

Inductive thinking teaches us to scrutinize the information that is presented to us and helps us build a deeper comprehension of the basic rules of Mass Psychology. By continually reading and studying the past and present issues of the market update, we can gradually understand how to apply Mass Psychology to improve not only our investments but all aspects of our life. Meanwhile, deductive reasoning helps us to take a more structured approach to evaluate information, allowing us to use the insights gained from inductive thinking to make informed decisions.

The key to success in this area is patience and discipline. Don’t rush into investing before fully understanding the rules and processes. Instead, take the time to study and learn. New opportunities are always presenting themselves, so it’s essential to be ready to embrace them when they arise. By combining inductive and deductive reasoning and applying the principles of Mass Psychology, we can improve our investments and lead a better life overall.

The Dark Side of Logic: Disadvantages of Deductive Reasoning

On the other hand, mass psychology, with its focus on inductive thinking, provides a more comprehensive approach to understanding human behaviour and attitudes. Rather than relying on a set of pre-existing facts, inductive thinking begins by observing patterns and behaviours within a group and drawing conclusions based on these observations. This method allows for a deeper understanding of the motivations and trends driving a group. It also provides a more accurate representation of their attitudes and beliefs. Thus, understanding mass psychology is crucial in avoiding the pitfalls of deductive thinking and making informed decisions based on a solid understanding of human behaviour.

However, what if the facts given to you are faulty or, worse yet, fake? Then, no matter how thorough your analysis, the result will be flawed. Sol Palha

From Observations to Conclusions: A Closer Look at Inductive Thinking

Inductive Thinking

Inductive thinking, which forms the basis of mass psychology, is a more sophisticated approach to understanding human behaviour and decision-making. Observing patterns and behaviours in a group and drawing conclusions from those observations allows for a more nuanced and in-depth understanding of motivations and attitudes. This method is particularly useful in the financial markets, where a thorough understanding of human behaviour and decision-making is key to making informed investment decisions.

Unfortunately, the conventional wisdom of hard work and endless memorization of facts often leads market participants astray from the power of inductive thinking. However, a basic understanding of mass psychology can be valuable for financial market participants. The simple principle of being cautious when everyone else is optimistic, and vice versa, is a starting point for fine-tuning one’s understanding of the potential of this powerful tool.

Key to Mass Psychology: Inductive Thinking

At TI, we believe that a deep understanding of mass psychology is critical to success in the financial markets. Mass psychology involves the study of the collective mindset and behaviours of a group and provides valuable insights into human decision-making and behaviour.

However, we understand that change and improvement can be challenging. However, it all starts with a desire for change. One must be willing to put in the effort to deprogram old, false beliefs and embrace a new way of thinking. And, like all things, mastering this process takes time and patience. Just as a child must learn to crawl before they can walk or run.

We believe that by focusing on the study of mass psychology, we can help individuals and investors gain a deeper understanding of the markets and make informed decisions that lead to long-term success.

Thus, if you seek to change, you must first want change.  Change is not something that comes about without some effort; effort is necessary because one has to deprogram one’s mind from old concepts that one was falsely led to believe.

Inductive Versus Deductive reasoning: Unlocking The Minds Potential

Your mind has been trained for decades to accept what mainstream media and so-called experts deemed to be true.  Sol Palha

At TI, we believe in challenging conventional wisdom and the notion of expertise. Our approach is grounded in healthy scepticism, recognizing that our minds have been trained for years to accept information from mainstream media and perceived experts without question.

We do not view anyone as an ultimate authority, including ourselves. Our focus is on constantly learning and growing. Furthermore, we have respect for those individuals who approach their work with a humble and open mind, acknowledging that there is always more to learn and discover.

We believe that the best way to approach any subject, including the financial markets, is with an open and curious mindset. By constantly seeking new information and challenging old assumptions. By keeping an open mind and a willingness to learn, we can continue to grow and improve our understanding of the markets and the world around us.

Idiots are forever clamouring for attention while the wise desperately seek to avoid it for they know their efforts are best directed towards seeking more knowledge rather than wasting time basking in the light of false glory.  Sol Palha 

Thoughts from other individuals on Inductive thinking

The strength of inductive reasoning lies in establishing probability. You might observe that when it is very cloudy, there is rain. Pure inductive reasoning would say that means it will rain on all cloudy days. You will observe days when this is not true. But through inductive reasoning, you establish the probability that it could rain on a cloudy day and prepare accordingly.

Another strength is that inductive reasoning allows you to be wrong. Only through more observation can you determine whether your premises are true. Detectives use this method of reasoning when investigating a crime. They see patterns or make observations that lead them to certain conclusions. That sets their path in motion, and they will either prove their conclusion right or wrong with further investigation. The value is that this form of reasoning has at least given them some direction Full Story

An Example of Inductive Thinking

Inductive reasoning begins with detailed observations of the world, which moves towards more abstract generalisations and ideas[4]. When following an inductive approach, beginning with a topic, a researcher develops empirical generalisations and identifies preliminary relationships as he progresses through his research. No hypotheses can be found at the initial stages of the research, and the researcher is not sure about the type and nature of the research findings until the study is completed.

As it is illustrated in the figure below, “inductive reasoning is often referred to as a “bottom-up” approach to knowing, in which the researcher uses observations to build an abstraction or to describe a picture of the phenomenon that is being studied”[5]   Full Story


 Deductive reasoning: Advantages and disadvantages

 Deductive research is a focused method of testing hypotheses. However, some critics would argue that this approach does not encourage divergent thinking.  It may also limit the scope of creativities.

The inductive approach: Advantages and disadvantages

According to Gratton and Jones (2009), the inductive approach generates an explanation from the data collected. It is the opposite of deductive research. Aims at exploring a new theory. It is about moving from specific observations to broader generalizations and theories.

The inductive approach is flexible as the researcher does not have to follow any pre-determined information. However, critics would argue that if observations are incorrect, the researcher will end up with incorrect conclusions.

Deductive vs inductive approaches to research

There are some differences between deductive and inductive approaches to research. In the deductive approach, the researcher begins the process by considering past and present theories concerning the topic of the research. This helps the researcher develop some hypotheses. The researcher will then test the new hypotheses in the process of conducting a new study. The collected data will either confirm or reject the hypotheses. Full Story

Inductive Reasoning vs Deductive reasoning

During the scientific process, deductive reasoning is used to reach a logical true conclusion. Another type of reasoning, inductive, is also used. Often, people confuse deductive reasoning with inductive reasoning and vice versa. It is important to learn the meaning of each type of reasoning to identify proper logic.

This type of reasoning is a basic form of valid reasoning. Deductive reasoning, or deduction, starts out with a general statement or hypothesis and examines the possibilities to reach a specific, logical conclusion, according to California State University. The scientific method uses deduction to test hypotheses and theories. “In deductive inference, we hold a theory, and based on it we make a prediction of its consequences. That is, we predict the observations if the theory were correct. We go from the general — the theory — to the specific — the observations,” said Dr Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller, a researcher and professor emerita at Albert Einstein College of Medicine.

This type of reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Such reasoning makes broad generalizations from specific observations. Basically, there is data; then, conclusions are drawn from the data. This is called inductive logic, according to Utah State University.

“In inductive inference, we go from the specific to the general. We make many observations, discern a pattern, make a generalization, and infer an explanation or a theory,” Wassertheil-Smoller told Live Science. “In science, there is a constant interplay between inductive inference (based on observations) and deductive inference (based on theory), until we get closer and closer to the ‘truth,’ which we can only approach but not ascertain with complete certainty.”

An example of inductive logic is, “The coin I pulled from the bag is a penny. That coin is a penny. A third coin from the bag is a penny. Therefore, all the coins in the bag are pennies.”  Full Story


New Notes on Inductive thinking Jan 2023

Inductive reasoning: forming generalizations from specific observations or experiences. It is a form of reasoning that is based on empirical evidence. It can provide a more accurate representation of reality.

There are several advantages of using inductive thinking, including:

  1. Improved accuracy: Inductive thinking enables individuals to form conclusions based on their own observations and experiences. This provides a more accurate representation of reality.
  2. Increased creativity: Inductive thinking encourages individuals to explore new ideas. And to look for patterns and relationships that may not be immediately obvious.
  3. Better decision-making: By focusing on the facts and data, inductive thinking can help individuals make more informed decisions. Because it provides a more complete picture of a situation or problem.
  4. Better problem-solving: Inductive thinking helps individuals to identify root causes and underlying patterns. This makes it a useful tool for solving complex problems.

Overall, inductive thinking is a valuable tool for making informed decisions. It encourages individuals to be curious, creative, and open-minded. It also helps them to form more accurate conclusions based on evidence and experience.

Other Articles Of Interest

Why market crashes are buying opportunities

A clear Illustration of the Mass Mindset In Action

Inductive Versus Deductive reasoning

Mass Psychology Introduction

Comic Strip Illustrating Mass Mindset

Mass Psychology or Contrarian Investing

Contrarian Investment Guidelines

Fashion contrarian 

7 rules for contrarian investing



Talks with the devil, Peter Ouspensky, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/213162.Talks_with_a_Devil

Why the stock market is up amid chaos in the streets, CNBC, https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/01/why-the-stock-market-is-up-amid-chaos-in-the-streets.html

What is smart money, Investopedia, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/smart-money.asp

Any monkey can beat the market, Forbes, https://www.forbes.com/sites/rickferri/2012/12/20/any-monkey-can-beat-the-market/#2439f8b630ae

Mental Model: The Illusion of Choice: JoshuaKennon.com, https://bit.ly/3jLpaAm

Why Most Investors Lose Money — And How Not To Be One Of Them, Nasdaq, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/why-most-investors-lose-money-and-how-not-be-one-them-2018-05-14

Here’s why Warren Buffett made a huge mistake selling his airline stocks, Market Watch, https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-why-warren-buffett-made-a-huge-mistake-selling-his-airline-stocks-2020-05-26

Dumb Money Making Smart Stock Picks in Yearlong Robinhood Rally, Bloomberg, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-25/dumb-money-making-smart-stock-picks-in-yearlong-robinhood-rally

How fear destroys your wealth. Economic times, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/news/how-fear-destroys-your-wealth-when-the-market-is-in-turmoil/articleshow/66474519.cms?from=mdr