Why Global Warming Is A Hoax & How Oil Giants Are Feeling The Heat

Why Global Warming Is A Hoax

Why Global Warming Is A Hoax

Consider this article for it might prove to be interesting; a small excerpt is posted below.

In the past, when the yield curve inverted, the Fed did not ease up on its aggressive rate-hiking stance. The current Fed has no choice but to lower rates.  So the Fed is going to likely end the yield inversion sooner or later by lowering rates

Secondly, even if the curve has inverted, it takes an average of 21 months to trigger a recession that is like a lifetime in the markets.

Sweden is proving that we are in a new era, rates are already negative there, but they have still averted a recession.

At the Tactical Investor, we focus on the trend so we could care less what the mass media thinks about the future of the economy. History indicates that the experts and mass media collectively have the IQ of a Jackass, and if one is wise one will never start a debate with an ass. Today’s News, as we have stated for a long time, falls under the category of gossipYield Curve Fears As Treasury Yield Curve Inverts


Why Global Warming Is A Hoax

Politicians are throwing money that they do not have at a problem that does not exist in order to finance solutions that make no difference.” Michael Hart

For almost 20 years I went along with what I was told. CO2 is a greenhouse gas. We were putting more and more of it into the atmosphere. Global warming has been increasing because of it. A consensus of scientists and government officials from around the world must be right. I put solar panels on my roof and went for a hike. Then, one day, I started looking deeper. Here’s what I’ve found out.

The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), federal agencies, mainstream media and California Democrats are dictating bad, as in both expensive and ineffective, energy policy based on faulty (or fraudulent) climate models. The IPCC’s, and later Al Gore’s, dire predictions of Arctic meltdown from 20 years ago, and 10 years ago have failed to materialize, twice now. But wait, AOC says we have only 10 more years to prevent the end of the world.

Whatever happened to investigative journalism? Why is the mainstream media not questioning such thinly veiled propaganda and attempted manipulation of our energy policy? Why are they ignoring Climategate? Full Link

Other articles of interest

Media Manipulates Financial Markets via Good & bad News (21 May)

Negative rates in Denmark means banks Pay you money for taking a mortgage (20 May)

Good Money management-Better Solution than Gold standard (14 May)

Most Hated Bull Market ever not Ready to Crumble (May 10)

$1 trillion worth of shorts set to drive Dow higher (May 5)

College Graduates Drowning in debt refuse to give up luxuries (May 1)

Fear mongers are parasites that profit from your fear (2 May)

Gold Bugs think & stop listening to Fear mongers  (1 May)

China launches a civilised tourist program (April 29)

Alibaba poised for Strong growth & continued success (April 28)

Innovations Key Growth driver for China’s new economy States Brookings (April 26)

China-Pakistan Economic Corridor moving forward (April 24)

Cooperation essential for Nuclear Security (April 23)

China takes a pragmatic approach to Green Energy (April 22)

Report by CSIS on China Belt & Road worthless (April 20)


Paul Swann

WTF? An informative article trashed by a moronic headline and tags. Is that you Vladimir Basic? If so, you’re a fucking idiot.

Paul Swann

Tracking back through the articles you’ve posted over the past couple of months I see that your climate change denialism has no scientific basis. Instead you’ve lazily fallen for Big Oil funded misinformation campaigns such as the 1998 petition by 32k “scientists” (anyone with a degree was entitled to sign it) which you dragged up again on 22 March, despite it having been discredited 10 years ago:


Your article ‘Global Warming Hoax destroyed by Nobel Laureate’ was based on the views of Dr Ivar Glaever, whose lack of credibility in the field of climate change was ruthlessly exposed in 2012:


By any standards this is sloppy journalism of the worst kind.

A suggestion to help you avoid further embarrassment, assuming your attention span stretches to a 27 page document: read the IPCC’s 5th assessment report summary for policy makers of the physical science basis for climate change:


Then, if you can, produce evidence that negates it. Good luck with that.

Tactical Investor

It would not hurt if you actually stated some facts other than posting an idiotic phrase. Global Warming is a scam. While We don’t favour what big oil companies are doing, the science being Global warming is faulty at best. In the future, please post something of value as opposed to a blanket statement that is meaningless

Tactical Investor

One word Geo-magnetism. the world has gone through such phases before. And there is a host of science which I am sure such a scholarly person such as yourself has failed to look at, which shows that higher C02 levels are more conducive to health and longevity. I won’t bother providing you the information as you are already lazy. Look at the St Lazarus clinic.

Finally, anyone with a shred of common sense would know that with AL Gore that the frontier something is amiss, but that big fact slipped your mind. Oh the co founder of Green peace is also in our camp

Paul Swann

Are you talking to yourself?

“Global warming is a scam” is both an idiotic phrase and a blanket statement that is meaningless.

Just follow my prescription: inform yourself be reading some actual science instead of falling hook, line and sinker for Big Oil funded misinformation.

Paul Swann

Evidently you’re content with a career in trotting out bullshit.

Paul Swann

“Oh the co founder of Green peace is also in our camp”.

Another prime example of misinformation. You’re referring to Dr Patrick Moore, right? Greenpeace statement:

“Patrick Moore frequently portrays himself as a founder or co-founder of Greenpeace, and many news outlets have repeated this characterization. Although Mr. Moore played a significant role in Greenpeace Canada for several years, he did not found Greenpeace. Phil Cotes, Irving Stowe, and Jim Bohlen founded Greenpeace in 1970. Patrick Moore applied for a berth on the Phyllis Cormack in March, 1971 after the organization had already been in existence for a year.”

Be that as it may, his denialism is comprehensively deconstructed here:


Who’s lazy?

“Finally, anyone with a shred of common sense would know that with AL Gore that the frontier something is amiss, but that big fact slipped your mind.”

This sentence doesn’t even make sense. Tell me, what’s the “big fact” that slipped my mind?

Paul Swann

“Look at the St Lazarus clinic.”

I would if I could find a link. Can you provide one please?

Samuel Saint

I believe what the author is trying to say is that with someone like Al Gore in the forefront of the global warming campaign, it leaves a lot to be desired. His huge house and his massive heating and cooling bill go against everything he advocates in an Inconvenient truth IMHO.

Carbon dioxide is useful, there is too much info to post, and I am a slow typist, so this link will provide a solid source of info. Note that most animals that live in areas with higher Co2 concentrations tend to live longer


Tactical Investor

Hum, from NASA,

“Carbon dioxide and nitric oxide are natural thermostats,” says James Russell from Hampton University, who was one of the lead investigators for the groundbreaking SABER study. “When the upper atmosphere (or ‘thermosphere’) heats up, these molecules try as hard as they can to shed that heat back into space.”


Let me guess NASA also does not know anything right. They are now stating that Carbon Dioxide actual cools the atmosphere, the very thing that is supposed to warm it

Tactical Investor

I think you looked in the mirror while making that comment. Here is another Dr for you, are you going to call him a fraud also. Don’t you know the simple rule if the masses buy its crap. How are you with investments, are you part of the masses who panic as soon as they hear negative news,

Among the scientists speaking at the realist summit were Dr. Robert Carter, former chief of the School of Earth Sciences at James Cook University. “Global warming is not happening,” he explained, even noting that long-term cooling was predicted. Carter’s presentation was especially fascinating because it totally shredded the outlandish notion that CO2 — exhaled by humans and critical to life — is “carbon pollution” in need of regulation. In fact, he said, even at current atmospheric concentrations, the Earth and the plants it supports are “starving” for more CO2. And in the past, CO2 concentrations were some 10 to 15 times higher. “Attempting to stop climate change is an exercise in utter futility,” he added, noting in an interview with The New American that nobody would seriously consider trying to “stop” earthquakes or volcanic eruptions.http://yournewswire.com/paris-stunned-as-scientists-debunk-climate-change-hysteria/

I had a better source, but I closed the window by mistake and this link essentially repeats what the other website was stating.

Paul Swann

Discernment, fella. Do you know the meaning of the word?

Your article quotes Dr Willie Soon, astrophysicist and geoscientist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. And recipient of “substantial funding from the fossil fuel industry for most of his scientific career and heavy corporate funding in the last decade.”


As well as lacking discernment, your climate literacy appears to hover around 1 out of 10. Again, spend a bit of time with the actual science and you might avoid further embarrassment.

Paul Swann

Having a health issue that’s caused by a CO2 blood deficiency, I know better than most that CO2 is useful to humans. We breathe in 400 parts per million and breathe out 5%; it’s pretty much curtains when the level drops to 3%.

CO2 is also extremely useful as a climate thermostat, as Vladimir himself has pointed out. Without it, we’d be a frozen planet. But global warming occurs when the atmospheric concentration of CO2 increases, as it continues to do so as a result of human industrial and economic activity.

To be fair, climate science is highly complex and not at all easy for non-scientists to understand. It takes time to get your head around it. And once you have, a whole range of other issues come up which are also hugely challenging, such as the economics, politics, psychology and ethics of climate change.

Acquire a reasonable level of climate literacy and you’ll be in a position to offer an informed opinion on whether global warming is real or not. NASA’s climate change website is a good place to start: http://climate.nasa.gov

Tactical Investor

Once again you resort to using profanity (this time it has been edited). If you cannot make a statement without being profane, we will have to delete all your comments. Your use of profanity indicates that you know less than you claim.

You have the right to your opinion. You don’t have the right to force your opinion on others. Nothing you have said has changed my mind. Cholesterol was supposed to be bad for health that was nonsense. Peak oil was supposed to hit mankind that was nonsense and the list goes on.

Next you will say Global warming caused the Sahara to turn from a lush zone into a desert. Fossil fuels may cause pollution but Global warming that is a big hoax. Big oil are bunch of bandits but that does not mean I am going to agree with Global warming.

You also did not answer my questions as to how you have done in terms of investing. I ask that for it is clearly shown that the masses are always on the wrong side of the game. They have now bought into this global warming crap and so on that basis alone the odds state that what the government is putting out is nothing but BS.

Once again you are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to telling others what they should or should not believe. Note that not once did we tell you to do otherwise and throughout this we have kept it civil. So if you have a different opinion, then lets agree to disagree. Or you can come out with your own blog and rant and rave as much as you want in whatever direction that happens to tickle your fancy.

Tactical Investor

Conveniently you ignore the info on Dr Carter posted above. The only jackass here I fear is you. If you know so much you would not resort to name calling. Why don’t you spend your time writing an article and putting it up somewhere instead of misdirecting your energy and trying to force your crap down someone’s throat. As stated before you are entitled to your opinion, but keep it civil and don’t force others to accept it. I put out some information I have not forced anyone to accept it. That choice is up to the reader, I suggest you take a similar path.