Bad Journalism
Some people are so filled with hate that they forget the opportunity the West has given them. A typical example is seen in Monica Rajesh who works for the Telegraph in England. You would think she would be happy to have a decent job and as she is a journalist one would think she would have at least a grain or two of common sense, but alas that’s to much to ask nowadays. This bad journalism in its full glory; hopefully this is not a new trend.
However, it seems her brain ceased to work, or she never had one, to begin with. Only a moron would call for the assassination of the next president. Imagine what would have happened had Trump supporters tweeted something along the same lines relating to Hillary. The internet and the media would be having a field day, yet so far, the scene is relatively quiet. This Jackass should be dealt with immediately; she should be sacked for promoting hate and the assassination of the next president of the US.
She must be running scared for she deleted her account but not before many copies of her tweet were made; one of them is posted below
Some reactions from Twitters
This is what brainwashed liberals are calling for. They call for calm when they win but when they lose the resort to violence. Notice all the pre-printed Yellow signs being held up at the Trump protests; you can tell someone is funding these idiots and most likely Soros’s organisation is playing a role in these riots
Why do we cover so many topics?
The short and straightforward answer is that all these fields are connected; we do not have free market forces anymore. Everything is manipulated; from the food, you eat to data you are provided. If you are aware of this, you can plan accordingly. Identifying the problem is over 80% of the solution, and this is why most people do not know what to do because they do not understand the problem. Mass psychology is a very powerful tool, and if employed correctly can help you spot the abnormal levels of manipulation, the masses are subjected to. It would be a good idea to familiarise yourself with the concept of “ Plato’s allegory of the cave.”
If you seek freedom, the 1st task is to attain financial freedom so that you can break free the clutches of the top players who strive to enslave you. They want you to run in a circle like a hamster that runs on a spinning wheel; the hamster thinks the faster it runs the further it will go, but sadly it is going nowhere.
We teach how to use Mass psychology to your advantage, how to view disasters as opportunities and how not to let the media manipulate you and direct you towards actions that could be detrimental to your overall well-being. Visit the investing for dummies section of our website; it contains a plethora of free resources and covers the most important aspects of mass psychology.
Secondly, subscribe to our free newsletter to keep abreast of the latest developments. Change begins now and not tomorrow, for tomorrow never comes. Understand that nothing will change if you do not alter your perspective and change your mindset. If you cling to the mass mentality, the top players will continue to fleece you; the choice is yours; resist and break free or sit down and do nothing.
Other Articles of Interest
Trump’s win shows Mainstream media is done-Social Media will dominate (Nov 9)
Financial Singularity and what it means for Stock Markets (Nov 8)
Top US Scientist Resigns-States Global Warming A Big Scam (Nov 8)
Stock Market Pattern Gives Trump 86 Percent Chance of Winning (Nov 7)
Two Professors with Incredible Track Record Predict A Trump Win (Nov 7)
American Education equivalent to Rubbish (Nov 1)
Internal FBI Uproar over Hillary Clinton’s email probe (Nov 1)
Trey Gowdy States Harry Reid on Drugs regarding Hillary Email Scandal (Oct 31)
Tactical Investor Election Polls-Updated Constantly Until Election day (Oct 21)
Mikhail Khodorkovsky-Corrupt Jewish Neocon Oligarch (Oct 21)
Everything you knew about cholesterol could change because it’s one massive lie (
What a piece of garbage person. Hope the FBI pay her a long visit.
“Imagine what would have happened had Trump supporters tweeted something along the same lines relating to Hillary.”
So, apparently, it’s been forgotten that Trump, himself, called for exactly that…during rallies…on live TV…TWICE. Uh huh.
That’s an outright lie
Clearly, you are misinformed with the definition of the word “lie.”
First time:
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/10/us/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton.html?_r=0
Not only did we think it was threatening, the Secret Service did so as well:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/10/politics/trump-second-amendment/
Second time:
http://www.npr.org/2016/09/16/494328717/trumps-second-amendment-rhetoric-again-veers-into-threatening-territory
Both comments were made during his rallies. Both were on live TV. Two times. Twice. Don’t waste my time with “alternate” facts, I deal in reality and only reality. I am not condoning what was said about Trump’s assassination. I am merely reminding the poster of the comment that Trump himself made very explicit comments that were received by more than Clinton supporters and the media, but by proper authorities (the Secret Service to name them), as threatening and inappropriate. That is not a lie – outright or otherwise.
Again I challenge that. He never said let’s take her out as in assinatation. So your assertion is BS. The simple truth is you liberals can’t accept you lost.
Clearly you head would be exploding had this been comment made about President Obama.. I find it utter hypocrisy
First of all, Trump, himself, challenged the ruling when the popular vote was higher than the Electoral College vote in 2012. In fact, he called for a march on Washington, saying it was a sham, a travesty and our country was divided; a disaster for democracy. In 2012 the total was way less than 2.9 million that Clinton got above Trump – so while you are whining that we liberals can’t accept we lost, remember Cheetolini beat us to it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/11/15/trumps-flip-flop-on-the-electoral-college-from-disaster-to-genius/?utm_term=.d3964f9abc7b (They have his own Tweets, including those he wisely decided to delete after his blistering loss to Clinton in popular votes.) And there was absolutely no hacking of our systems by hostile foreign governments that Trump just happens to be kissing up to at the time.
Secondly, I have not, will not, nor ever have attempted to deny he did not use the exact wording “take her out” but it was more than enough that the SECRET SERVICE thought it was too much. Implied threat is still a threat. A man standing before a crowd making remarks about the Second Amendment, his opponent, and how she could be “stopped” when there is literally one and only one meaning behind that, is exactly why the Secret Service got involved. Whether he used the words verbatim do not matter as EVEN the Secret Service decided that there was no possible other meaning behind it. The threat was clear cut. Challenge all you want – I am backed by the Secret Service who decided that was what happened and dealt with him in regards to that. Period. It’s not an assertion, it’s a fact.
Thirdly, you find WHAT utter hypocrisy? That I’m not freaking out over a writer who is calling for the assassination of a man who TWICE called for the assassination of Clinton as I have – ONCE AGAIN – proved well enough for the SECRET SERVICE?! One person attempted to get into the White House to assassinate President Obama. I’ve already been down those roads, and, oddly enough, what I got from your side was what you are attacking me for right now. Only this time, your side, in the form of Trump, gives me way more ammunition, so to speak.
Again, as I stated before, I do not condone in ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM a direct or indirect threat against Trump. I am merely, yet again, pointing out that there is a great deal of HYPOCRISY in screaming about Trump being threatened when TRUMP HIMSELF THREATENED THE LIFE OF CLINTON. We are not talking about a Trump supporter, we are talking about Trump, himself, making statements from the podium that were threatening enough that required the Secret Service agents to get involved. You can pretend all you want that it wasn’t threatening-it was enough for the people who defend the lives of those who are in office to say it was. So, if he’s going to run his mouth, then there are people who are going to spew it right back to him. Do I agree with it? Absolutely not, but I didn’t agree with him making those comments against Clinton either. Whether you like her, hate her, or want mushrooms to grow in her butt – threatening her life is not right. Until then, the platform is moot. If he can threaten someone else’s life-TWICE-it’s going to be difficult to find anyone who cares if his is threatened.
Lastly…it’s “assassination.” Seriously, what is it with you people?