What Is Escalation of Commitment? The Costly Trap of Bad Decisions

Escalation of Commitment

Escalation of Commitment: The Relentless Trap of Stubborn Persistence

July 10, 2025

Why do we double down on the doomed? Why keep pushing money, time, and energy into outcomes we already suspect are collapsing? Escalation of commitment isn’t just a cognitive slip—it’s psychological gravity. It hooks into pride, burrows into denial, and weaponises our past decisions against us. What began as a bold bet morphs into a self-imposed trap, where walking away feels harder than failure itself.

This isn’t a novice’s flaw. The sharpest minds—generals, CEOs, seasoned investors—get pulled under, convinced that quitting equals weakness. They mistake persistence for strategy. But when the foundation rots, building higher only ensures the collapse hurts more—a business clings to a failed launch. A government digs deeper into a war it can’t win. A trader averages down, hoping to rescue ego, not capital. The cost isn’t just monetary. It’s identity-level. And the deeper in we go, the harder it becomes to admit we were wrong.

Escalation is a mirror. It reflects not just flawed decisions, but the fear behind them: fear of looking foolish, of wasted effort, of losing face. The only antidote is brutal clarity. You must question your motives with surgical precision. Cut faster. Pivot sooner. Master the art of strategic retreat before the spiral makes exit impossible.

The Psychology Behind Escalation

Long before modern psychology gave it a name, this flaw was already in the philosophical crosshairs. Montaigne wrote of man’s tendency to become “more firmly wedded to his error once challenged.” That’s the skeleton of escalation—ego entangled with outcome, a refusal to step back because we’ve tied our worth to being right.

Today, we call it by what it is: a web of cognitive traps. Confirmation bias filters every signal, reinforcing what we want to believe. We cherry-pick good news from failure, mistaking noise for validation. The sunk cost fallacy then tightens the noose, telling us that quitting wastes the sacrifice, even when continuing guarantees deeper loss.

But it’s not just logic that breaks. Emotion hijacks decision-making. Pride demands vindication. Fear whispers that retreat equals humiliation—loyalty—especially in leadership—compounds it. We stay not because it makes sense, but because leaving feels like betrayal: of the team, the mission, the version of ourselves who made the call.

And this is where escalation gets lethal. It doesn’t just distort judgment—it rewires identity. We start defending the decision instead of solving the problem. The longer we stay, the more we believe we must. That’s how careers implode, empires collapse, and portfolios vanish—not in one move, but in a slow bleed of refusal to pivot.

The solution isn’t just awareness. It’s emotional detachment. The ability to decouple identity from outcome, to see the data for what it is, not what you hoped it would be. Because until you kill the need to be right, you’ll keep feeding the thing that’s already eating you.

 

The High Price of Refusing to Let Go: When Stubbornness Becomes Self-Destruction

History isn’t subtle. It punishes those who cling to dead weight. Empires drained themselves chasing unwinnable wars. Corporations burned billions defending obsolete products. People sank decades into dead careers and toxic relationships—all to avoid the shame of being wrong. The price? Time, capital, and dignity—wasted.

Take the tech company that won’t scrap a failed product. Internal warnings pile up, competitors eat their lunch, but leadership stays married to the fantasy. By the time they face reality, the company is hollowed out. This plays out everywhere: investors doubling down on bad trades, managers chasing sunk projects, lovers clinging to decay. The longer you stay, the worse it gets.

Escalation isn’t resilience. It’s denial with a timer. The smart cut losses early. Not because they’re weak, but because they know what survival demands.

Timeless Strategy: Adaptability Beats Blind Persistence

Perseverance becomes a vice when it stops serving the mission. Strategy without flexibility is just elegant suicide. History’s most effective minds—Machiavelli, Munger, Boyd—understood: you don’t just need grit, you need grip. You need control over your judgment, not just your effort.

Ask yourself: are you holding on out of logic, or because your ego can’t stomach retreat? The true measure of strength isn’t how long you persist—it’s how intelligently you pivot. If you’re not reassessing constantly, you’re not being resilient. You’re being reckless.

Mastering the Pivot: Ruthless Execution for Strategic Exit

Awareness without action is just another trap. Escape must be engineered.

High performers build in exit points before emotions take the wheel. Clear triggers: If revenue doesn’t hit X by Q2, kill the launch. If the trade moves against you by more than 5%, exit—no questions asked. The military calls it contingencies. Traders call it risk management. Smart operators call it necessary.

They also install friction against delusion. Assign a devil’s advocate—force scenario planning. Drill the downside, not just the dream. Know where the plan fails before you find out in public.

Celebrate good exits like good wins. Track retreats like trophies. The art of quitting is underrated—and in complex systems, often the only way to win.

Emotional Detachment: The Discipline to Walk Without Drama

Pride is the parasite that drains empires. It convinces smart people to die on stupid hills.

Detachment isn’t indifference—it’s control. Look at Nokia. They had the tech. But they couldn’t let go of the past. By the time they pivoted, Apple and Samsung were done eating. Same in life: people linger in jobs, marriages, investments—not because they work, but because they’ve sunk too much into it to let go. That’s inertia masquerading as loyalty.

The fix? Audit your own story. The most dangerous lies are the ones you tell yourself: “I’ve come too far,” “I can’t quit now,” “Just one more shot.” Stop chasing closure. Build rituals around reassessment. Surround yourself with clarity, not comfort. Cut what no longer serves. Nothing erodes potential faster than clinging to what’s already failed.

The Power and Peril of Collective Delusion

One stubborn leader can ruin a team. A room full of them can collapse civilisations.

Groupthink killed the Challenger crew. The warnings were there. But consensus silenced dissent. And so the shuttle launched—right into catastrophe. Kodak had digital photography first. But they feared cannibalising film. So they clung—and got buried.

Collective escalation is harder to detect. It looks like “alignment,” “consensus,” and “vision.” But it’s often just cowardice in numbers. Great teams build dissent into the model. They reward truth over loyalty. If your group punishes questioning, you’re not aligned—you’re blind.

And when the stakes rise—politics, markets, society—the cost of delusion multiplies. Governments stay in wars to save face. Industries ignore innovation to protect legacy margins. The crowd rewards false certainty until the crash comes.

The smart don’t wait. They exit early—track signals. Kill sacred cows. And never confuse agreement with intelligence.

 

 

Escalation of Commitment: When Stubbornness Becomes Self-Destruction

Society glorifies persistence, but few acknowledge its dark side—when commitment turns into reckless denial. The illusion of heroism in “sticking it out” blinds people to reality. Smart leaders, investors, and individuals know when to pivot. Stubbornly clinging to a failing plan doesn’t make you noble—it makes you blind.

Strategic adaptation is power. Investors who recognise when a trade has lost momentum cut losses and reposition. Managers who see an employee misaligned with a role act before damage compounds. Relationships, business strategies, and personal goals all require reassessment. The moment you justify staying the course based on sunk costs, ego, or fear of appearing inconsistent, you’ve lost.

Escalation of commitment isn’t just a trap—it’s a test. Can you separate pride from logic? Can you recognise when persistence is sabotaging success? The strongest leaders and sharpest minds embrace adaptability over illusion. The longer you hold onto a failing path, the greater the cost. Cut losses early, redirect resources wisely, and reclaim control before failure becomes irreversible.

Final Note

Escalation of commitment is seductive because it masquerades as strength. But there’s nothing noble in doubling down on decay. The boldest move isn’t to hold the line—it’s knowing when the line is leading you off a cliff. Pivot early. Cut fast. Win more.

Inspiring Fresh Thoughts: Thought-Provoking Reads