Monsanto under attack - Tactical Investor
Monsanto under attack

Monsanto under attack

Monsanto under attack

Monsanto under attack; the masters of deception are losing their hold

GMO: Germans Eating Healthy Again?

Today many countries are in a deep battle to decide whether to allow or prohibit Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO). In Russia, the government has been in a heated debate for months over a possible ban. China has rejected US shipments of corn for containing illegal GMO corn from Syngenta. Brazil is moving away from GMO soybean cultivation to certified Non-GMO soya. India is also in a heated governmental battle over GMOs. Sometimes I find it enjoyable to report when something positive and healthy for us takes place. Such is the case with what may seem a tiny development, but in reality marks an extremely important shift that could have a profound effect on our food security. It has to do with chickens; chickens sold in Germany. It is perhaps a marker in a global war for our future food health.

In February this year the German Poultry Association (Zentralverband der Deutschen Geflügelwirtschaft e.V. or ZDG), unilaterally declared that it was stopping using GMO-free animal feed, following similar moves by other associations in England and Denmark. They claimed that there was a worldwide shortage of certified GMO-free soya, a prime component in industrial chicken feed today. It turns out that was a lie, a lie clearly to the interest of the world’s largest patented GMO soya seed purveyor, Monsanto, who dominates USA and Argentina GMO soya cultivation. The world soybean cultivation is dominated by three growing regions—USA, Argentina, and Brazil. The only one of the three that still can certify significant no-GMO soybeans is Brazil, something Monsanto and the GMO food cartel would like to end. It’s no minor issue. Far away most of the GMO acreage under cultivation in the world today is for GMO soybeans or GMO corn.

Battle lines are drawn

At the end of August, battle lines were becoming clearly defined in a war for German and, in reality, global food security. At the end of August, a group of the most powerful German supermarkets demanded from the German Poultry Association (ZDG) to stop using GMO feed for both egg and poultry meat production, starting from January 1st, 2015. In early December Germany’s largest poultry producer, Weisenhof, based in Lower Saxony, raised the white flag of surrender and announced that it will return to using GMO-free animal feed due to “consumer demand.” Alexander Hissting of VLOG (Association of Food without Genetic Engineering) told the German Der Spiegel: “We expect an almost complete return of the poultry meat industry to GMO-free production in the coming months.”

A group of Germany’s leading Supermarket groups, not content with the ZDG explanation, had consulted the Brazilian soybean producers following the claim by ZDG. The supermarkets found they had been lied to by the poultry association. The reason the ZDG gave for not continuing GMO-free soya feeding was not the case. There is clearly enough Brazilian GMO-free feed in the system to supply Europe’s needs.I have absolutely no personal or commercial interest in any of the following supermarket groups. In the interest of greater consumer awareness, I am naming the German supermarkets that have so far fought and apparently are about to win the rollback of the ZDG that consumers might be able to decide themselves where they buy their family’s poultry. Full Story

 [color-box color=”orange”]This is the change we have been speaking of; Monsanto is nothing but a monstrous machine seeking to destroy natural agriculture and control the means of production.  Their GMO seeds not only do not produce better quality harvests, but they require higher amounts of toxic pesticides. Their marketing campaign was more for less instead the average person ended up getting less and paying more.  The power they have to force regular farmers into joining them is nothing short of terrifying. They fight with you till you run out of resources and then you are forced to settle.  However, shortly they will be dealt a strong blow; out of nowhere the winds of change will blow and then that power that was bestowed on them will be removed just as promptly. [/color-box]

  As Monsanto controls the seeds and the toxic chemicals, the farmer is always dependent on them. They cannot store the seeds; they must always buy them.   The resistance actually began in Russia; Russia told Monsanto to get the hell out and take their crap with them.


We are going to put up only a portion of this story. If you want to read the rest click on the link found towards the end of the story

Myth #1: No one has ever proven that GMOs are harmful to people.

Monsanto mouthpieces have been quoted time, time, and time again stating the untruth that genetically modified organisms have never been proven to harm people. It seems that they believe, like Joseph Goebbels, the uncontested King of Propaganda, that if you repeat a lie often enough, and with enough conviction, that it becomes the accepted truth. The reality: Just a few of the results of a GMO diet (based on peer-reviewed studies) are: grotesque tumors, premature death, organ failure, gastric lesions, liver damage, kidney damage, severe allergic reactions, a viral gene that disrupts human functions…you can read more HERE.

Myth #2: GMO crops are the only way to solve world hunger.

The most common pro-GMO argument that you will hear these days is that genetically modified crops are the only way to feed the worlds burgeoning population. Without them, proponents claim that hunger will claim the lives of millions over the next decade. In the gospel of biotech, GMOs are the answer to world hunger. If you protest against GMO technology, you are cast as a cold-hearted elitist and the deaths of all of those suffering children in ***** (pick-a-3rd-world-country) rest firmly on your doorstep.

The reality: Sustainable agricultural practices are the answer to world hunger. GMO farming practices are not sustainable. Farmers who plant GMOs are not able to save their seeds from year to year due to patent infringement and poor fertility in the seeds. Therefore, after getting the first year of good harvests, the following year they must continue buying seeds, leading to perpetual debt and enough financial despair in India (the Bt Cotton scandal) that an Indian farmer took his own life every 30 minutes, after becoming the indentured servant of Monsanto and drowning in insurmountable debt. Well over a quarter of a million farmers died by suicide before the country banned the sale of Bt cotton seeds.

Real Change News agrees that biotech farming methods are not the answer to world hunger. They recommend “agroecology”:

 Myth #3: GMOs need less pesticide spraying.

Monsanto claims that their Bt products require less spraying. It’s right HERE on their website (emphasis mine):

Crops with a Bt trait have been modified to produce a protein that is toxic to various forms of insect larvae. Bt proteins have long been used as topical sprays in conventional and organic agriculture because they are effective and can be used safely. Crops that are genetically engineered to carry the Bt trait allow farmers to protect their crops while eliminating or significantly decreasing the number of pesticides sprayed.

The reality: Unfortunately, the best-laid schemes of mice, men, and Monsanto often go awry. The Cornucopia Institute reports that was true for the first couple of years, but then use of pesticides and herbicides increased dramatically. (This, of course, resulted in a hefty profit for the producers of those chemicals who are…yep, you guessed it, Monsanto and the other biotech companies who produce the seeds.)

But a new study released by Food & Water Watch yesterday finds the goal of reduced chemical use has not panned out as planned.  In fact, according to the USDA and EPA data used in the report, the quick adoption of genetically engineered crops by farmers has increased herbicide use over the past 9 years in the U.S.  The report follows on the heels of another such study  by Washington State University research professor Charles Benbrook just last year.

Myth #4: GMO technology is comparable to the cross-breeding that our ancestors did to create hardier versions of heritage crops.

Check out this condescending blurb, straight from the horse’s …ummm….mouth (the Monsanto website):

Want to hear something extraordinary? Chances are, almost everything you’ve eaten in your entire life was genetically modified. The same was true for your parents…and your grandparents.

For more than 10,000 years, mankind has selectively bred plants and animals.  The cows you see in farmer’s fields bear little resemblance to the ancient Aurochs from which they descended. And the corn you eat is the domesticated version of a wild grass called teosinte.

The reality: What our ancestors did, and what responsible farmers do, is cross-pollination of different varieties of the same plant. It is a low-tech method that can occur naturally – but they just gave it a little bit of help in order to bring forth the desirable characteristics, like the drought-hardiness of one type of wheat combined with the shorter growing season required for another type of wheat. This is selective breeding. Genetically modifying seeds is a whole different ballgame, however. Here’s a great explanation from the Food Renegade website:

Unlike hybrid seeds, GMO seeds are not created using natural, low-tech methods. GMO seed varieties are created in a lab using high-tech and sophisticated techniques like gene-splicing. Furthermore, GMO seeds seldom cross different, but related plants. Often the cross goes far beyond the bounds of nature so that instead of crossing two different, but related varieties of plant, they arecrossing different biological kingdoms — like, say, a bacteria with a plant. For example, Monsanto has crossed genetic material from a bacteria known as Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) with corn. The goal was to create a pest-resistant plant. This means that any pests attempting to eat the corn plant will die since the pesticide is part of every cell of the plant.

The resultant GMO plant, known as Bt Corn, is itself registered as a pesticide with the EPA, along with other GMO Bt crops. In other words, if you feed this corn to your cattle, your chickens, or yourself, you’ll be feeding them an actual pesticide — not just a smidgeon of pesticide residue.

What’s even worse is that biotech has the ability to produce their seeds with a built in “terminator technology.” This means that the seeds cannot be saved from one year to the next (unlike the cross-pollinated seeds with which they try to claim kinship). Monsanto has patented the technology (called gene use restriction technology) but claims not to use it. This would produce sterile, lifeless seeds that could not be reused, leaving the farmers utterly dependent on the biotech companies for future crops while providing an ongoing stream of income for those companies. At this point they maintain their monopoly through a series of contracts and patents that require the repurchase of seeds annually.

Part of the reason Monsanto has been so successful in the courtroom has been the company’s incestuous ties to the US de facto government. Despite the blatant conflicts of interest, Monsanto executives have held Cabinet, judicial and policy-making positions in the Bush, Clinton and Obama administrations. When you’re sleeping with the enemy, the enemy tends to get away with all manner of crimes. full story

[color-box color=”green”]We posted only four of the ten reasons listed, visit the website above for the full list reasons; it makes for an interesting read. 

There is nothing good about anything that comes from Monsanto; it’s either bad or dangerous or both.  Make an effort to find out what you eat and abstain from eating GMO. You can also voice your concerns to your local supermarket.   The BRIC nations are waking up faster to the dangers of GMO foods than many developed countries; hopefully like Russia, they will all give Monsanto the boot.  Monsanto’s master plan is to own the seeds of the world.  But defeat is something these chaps better get used as the tide is turning. [/color-box]

Twenty-Six Countries Ban GMOs—Why Won’t the US?

The Nation and Foreign Policy In Focus are pleased to announce a new partnership to promote a more progressive US foreign policy. Each week, The Nation will post several FPIF articles on its website to provide greater visibility to progressive voices from around the world. Complementing The Nation’s coverage of domestic and world events, the FPIF articles will provide in-depth analysis of the issues that demand greater public and policymaking attention such as global military spending, climate change, human rights campaigns, economic inequality and ongoing conflicts in Syria, Afghanistan and elsewhere. The Nation/FPIF coverage will also highlight concrete alternatives that can make the world more peaceful, more just and more sustainable. Foreign Policy In Focus is a project of the Institute for Policy Studies, which is celebrating its fiftieth anniversary in 201Full Story

Other Articles of Interest:

Russian PAK-50 spectacular Arial Display Puts F-35 to Shame  (April 8)

Russia’s Syrian Success A Boon For weapons Sales (April 8)

Margin trading comeback could propel Chinese Markets Upwards (April 6)

Ted Cruz exposed; lies, deceit & more (April 5)

The Pension Nightmare & Ticking Time Bomb (April 5)

China Punishes 300,000 officials for Corruption; US does nothing (Apr