INTC and IBM represent two of my largest holdings at the current time. I have a few tech. and engineer friends, experts in their fields, who continue to try to advise me on which tech. companies to buy, based on all sorts of fundamental arguments, etc., blah, blah, blah.Triplethought wrote: ↑Mon Nov 15, 2021 6:37 pm I see INTC that way but not IBM. I worry IBM's time has passed if they can't make Watson relevant. So far my Machine learning friends say Watson continues to fail to impress. although I did buy more at $119 based on recommendations here.
They think their tech. and engineering backgrounds given them an "edge" in the markets.
I laugh my ass off and ask to see their investment returns. My only question is, did I 2x their returns in the last 5 - 10 years, or 5x to 10x? Usually it's the latter.
Generally, they have been pretty much completely wrong. I continue to mock them and consistently 2x - 5x or better their investment returns over a period of years.
And they continue to call me "lucky" or "crazy." Well, both may be somewhat true, but somehow, engineers seem to think they can "figure out" the markets with their "engineering" minds.
So, I'm glad when I hear your "Machine Learning friends" aren't too impressed with IBM. If it drops tomorrow, I will buy more. Same with INTC.
I love buying quiet, cheap Tech. Titans with significant strategic value to the U.S. DeepState, and who also happen to spin off juicy dividends.
To me, engineers and tech. types are among the best contrarian indicators, as a group. Good for a few laughs when discussing finances and investments.