Insights into the COVID Pandemic

[Budge]

*****

Unfortunate trend ...

Very true

Medicine should never be for profit incentives, but this a product of neo capitalism and money worshipping culture

FDA approves what could be the most expensive gene therapy/drug yet for a "potential cure" for a rare blood disorder (type of anaemia). $2.8m. Estimated global incidence 1:100000.

https://khn.org/morning-breakout/fda-ap ... r-patient/

[SOL]

FDA approves what could be the most expensive gene therapy/drug yet for a "potential cure" for a rare blood disorder (type of anaemia). $2.8m. Estimated global incidence 1:100000.

https://khn.org/morning-breakout/fda-ap ... r-patient/

And the cheapest drug will be called the Anti-critical thinker drug. It will be given for free when ready but once you get it, you will agree to pay 1000 per year for the rest of your life as you won't be able to think at all

[Budge]

FDA approves what could be the most expensive gene therapy/drug yet for a "potential cure" for a rare blood disorder (type of anaemia). $2.8m. Estimated global incidence 1:100000.

https://khn.org/morning-breakout/fda-ap ... r-patient/

And the cheapest drug will be called the Anti-critical thinker drug. It will be given for free when ready but once you get it, you will agree to pay 1000 per year for the rest of your life as you won't be able to think at all

Thought that was tertiary education

[deepthinker]

FDA approves what could be the most expensive gene therapy/drug yet for a "potential cure" for a rare blood disorder (type of anaemia). $2.8m. Estimated global incidence 1:100000.

https://khn.org/morning-breakout/fda-ap ... r-patient/

And the cheapest drug will be called the Anti-critical thinker drug. It will be given for free when ready but once you get it, you will agree to pay 1000 per year for the rest of your life as you won't be able to think at all

Thought that was tertiary education

What else can i add to that colorful comment other than a laugh. People are so stupid today, it would be funny if I was living in a bubble, but as it stands I have to pay for the way these MF's think and act, with either money or frustration or both.

[Eric]

Of topic, you can't save the majority no matter how hard you try. To be saved, one must seek salvation (as in Freedom). One must want it so badly that it becomes part of them; only these people will be willing to listen to information that shook up their entire belief system. The rest will crucify you for trying to destroy their illusions which they have so meticulously supported and nurtured via delusions such as experts know it all or I have to have faith in the system

I just heard today only 10% want to be free, the other 90% want to be told what to do. I also recently heard or read (here maybe?) that people only think 2-3 times a year, the other 99.998% of the time they're just completely on autopilot.

[SOL]

Of topic, you can't save the majority no matter how hard you try. To be saved, one must seek salvation (as in Freedom). One must want it so badly that it becomes part of them; only these people will be willing to listen to information that shook up their entire belief system. The rest will crucify you for trying to destroy their illusions which they have so meticulously supported and nurtured via delusions such as experts know it all or I have to have faith in the system

I just heard today only 10% want to be free, the other 90% want to be told what to do. I also recently heard or read (here maybe?) that people only think 2-3 times a year, the other 99.998% of the time they're just completely on autopilot.

The part of people actively thinking once or twice a year (usually due to some shock-type event or surprise that snaps them out of their stupor) is discussed eloquently in psycho cybernetics by Maxwell Maltz. You can also see this via people you know if you pay attention to what they do. In many cases, you will see no change over a span of 6 to 10 years other than physical ageing. You can see that the mind died long ago, and they are just working in auto mode. Auto mode is a combo of habits, beliefs and things that they memorized. outwardly some of them are quite brilliant.

[Yodean]

I just heard today only 10% want to be free, the other 90% want to be told what to do. I also recently heard or read (here maybe?) that people only think 2-3 times a year, the other 99.998% of the time they're just completely on autopilot.

To add a touch of nuance, one may also want to consider an individual's particular Circles Of Competence (COCs).

So a particular dude may be a real independent, critical thinker when it comes to certain areas - think Lebron bouncing an orange ball - but for a variety of reasons, prefer to follow the mainstream narratives in other areas of his life.

I mean, you could just look at the people you know. Some are amazing with money, but terrible when it comes to their physical health.

Others are monsters in the gym, but wear a mask and don't know what to do with the little money they have.

Still others invest well and are in good health, but are terrible in the romance/relationship department.

And so forth.

Always pays to know where one's COCs lie, and develop and grow new COCs when possible.

[SOL]

I just heard today only 10% want to be free, the other 90% want to be told what to do. I also recently heard or read (here maybe?) that people only think 2-3 times a year, the other 99.998% of the time they're just completely on autopilot.

To add a touch of nuance, one may also want to consider an individual's particular Circles Of Competence (COCs).

So a particular dude may be a real independent, critical thinker when it comes to certain areas - think Lebron bouncing an orange ball - but for a variety of reasons, prefer to follow the mainstream narratives in other areas of his life.

I mean, you could just look at the people you know. Some are amazing with money, but terrible when it comes to their physical health.

Others are monsters in the gym, but wear a mask and don't know what to do with the little money they have.

Still others invest well and are in good health, but are terrible in the romance/relationship department.

And so forth.

Always pays to know where one's COCs lie, and develop and grow new COCs when possible.

Sage suggestions.

Possible solution. Do things that make you uncomfortable. Familiarity breeds contempt, and routine leads to sleep

Self-observe instead of self-remembering and spot the things you do as a machine or you react to without thinking.

[MarkD]

A Steinbeck moment is nigh:

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-sho ... d-boosters

[Budge]

A Steinbeck moment is nigh:

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-sho ... d-boosters

"What's behind the FDA's controversial strategy for evaluating new COVID boosters"

Must be a GMM (Ginormous Moolah Moment)! ie CMOPWFL (Cross My Outstretched Palm With Filthy Lucre).

JAG (Just A Guess).

[Yodean]

JAG (Just A Guess).

I got a lot of them JAGs:

-as summer descends into fall and the weather cools, more coronaviruses will circulate, more pathogenic priming (antibody-dependent enhancement) will occur in the jabbed - i.e. more spike proteins circulating in areas of the body where they shouldn't be - more "excess deaths," "excess hospitalizations," etc.

Naturally, will all be blamed on "climate change." Or SADS (Sudden Adult Death Syndrome).

Or maybe it will be blamed on Trump.

That would be kind of funny.

[Eric]

Yodean, I can't quite square this attitude with your medical knowledge. No where have I found valid scientific literature that links Covid jabs to sudden onset cancer.

viewtopic.php?p=12230#p12230

In the above thread I posted a video where Dr. Ryan Cole explains how the jabs destroy the body's natural cancer fighting system.

Furthermore just a couple days ago ScienceDirect.com just posted a paper that analyzed the BS manipulated Pfizer and Moderna "studies" and came up with the following conclusion:

We conducted a simple harm-benefit comparison using the trial data comparing excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest (from the vaccine) or AESIs against reductions fn COVID-19 hospitalization. We found excess risk of serious AESIs to exceed the reduction in COVID-19 hospitalizations in both Pfizer and Moderna trials.

In other words the jabs have demonstrated absolutely no effectiveness as you can personal vouch for, and their risk of serious adverse reaction or death is very provably greater than zero. One divided by zero is infinity more danger than potential benefit.

[Yodean]

Yodean, I can't quite square this attitude with your medical knowledge. No where have I found valid scientific literature that links Covid jabs to sudden onset cancer.

viewtopic.php?p=12230#p12230

In the above thread I posted a video where Dr. Ryan Cole explains how the jabs destroy the body's natural cancer fighting system.

Furthermore just a couple days ago ScienceDirect.com just posted a paper that analyzed the BS manipulated Pfizer and Moderna "studies" and came up with the following conclusion:

We conducted a simple harm-benefit comparison using the trial data comparing excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest (from the vaccine) or AESIs against reductions fn COVID-19 hospitalization. We found excess risk of serious AESIs to exceed the reduction in COVID-19 hospitalizations in both Pfizer and Moderna trials.

In other words the jabs have demonstrated absolutely no effectiveness as you can personal vouch for, and their risk of serious adverse reaction or death is very provably greater than zero. One divided by zero is infinity more danger than potential benefit.

I believe YoungAnakin is getting his cv19 exposure at Burning Man currently, and given his previous posts, I suspect he pretty much ignores most of the cv19 posts. Lolol.

Will be interesting to see how he feels as we enter the fall/winter seasons ... muahahahhahahahahahahahha.

[Triplethought]

Yodean, I can't quite square this attitude with your medical knowledge. No where have I found valid scientific literature that links Covid jabs to sudden onset cancer.

viewtopic.php?p=12230#p12230

In the above thread I posted a video where Dr. Ryan Cole explains how the jabs destroy the body's natural cancer fighting system.

Furthermore just a couple days ago ScienceDirect.com just posted a paper that analyzed the BS manipulated Pfizer and Moderna "studies" and came up with the following conclusion:

We conducted a simple harm-benefit comparison using the trial data comparing excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest (from the vaccine) or AESIs against reductions fn COVID-19 hospitalization. We found excess risk of serious AESIs to exceed the reduction in COVID-19 hospitalizations in both Pfizer and Moderna trials.

In other words the jabs have demonstrated absolutely no effectiveness as you can personal vouch for, and their risk of serious adverse reaction or death is very provably greater than zero. One divided by zero is infinity more danger than potential benefit.

I believe YoungAnakin is getting his cv19 exposure at Burning Man currently, and given his previous posts, I suspect he pretty much ignores most of the cv19 posts. Lolol.

Will be interesting to see how he feels as we enter the fall/winter seasons ... muahahahhahahahahahahahha.

Back from burning man. still have a slight cough, lots of fatigue. Not too bad but working in 105 degree heat was a bit taxing. Feeling good I sold a bunch before I left as it seems nasdaq down another 2% last week.

Heading to raft the Colorado the entire length of the Grand Canyon tomorrow. Wish me luck going over Lava falls and see ya in 3 weeks.

[Triplethought]

Yodean, I can't quite square this attitude with your medical knowledge. No where have I found valid scientific literature that links Covid jabs to sudden onset cancer.

viewtopic.php?p=12230#p12230

In the above thread I posted a video where Dr. Ryan Cole explains how the jabs destroy the body's natural cancer fighting system.

Furthermore just a couple days ago ScienceDirect.com just posted a paper that analyzed the BS manipulated Pfizer and Moderna "studies" and came up with the following conclusion:

We conducted a simple harm-benefit comparison using the trial data comparing excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest (from the vaccine) or AESIs against reductions fn COVID-19 hospitalization. We found excess risk of serious AESIs to exceed the reduction in COVID-19 hospitalizations in both Pfizer and Moderna trials.

In other words the jabs have demonstrated absolutely no effectiveness as you can personal vouch for, and their risk of serious adverse reaction or death is very provably greater than zero. One divided by zero is infinity more danger than potential benefit.

My own experience in getting Covid twice despite being jabbed 4 times is as meaningless as yours. It simply isn't relevant to the science. an "N of 1" if you will. Same is true for anyone who "biohacks". I believe Biohackers have fools for both patients and doctors. "lived experience" is nothing but an anecdote and is completely useless for determining what is true or not medically.

I guess we all decide which quacks to listen to https://www.factcheck.org/2021/04/scich ... -vaccines/