Insights into the COVID Pandemic

[LoriPrecisely]

I didn't quite have the heart to tell him that the cv19 jabs likely contributed to the sudden appearance of his advanced lung cancer out of nowhere (through deleterious effects on immune surveillance of pre-cancerous cells), but I didn't really hold back in the other areas.


Dean[/i]

*****

Keep an eye out for a lot of "sudden" cancers being diagnosed in your friends and family ... the TrendForce behind this Slaughter is strong, and growing stronger ... the perishing has started ...

Yodean, I can't quite square this attitude with your medical knowledge. No where have I found valid scientific literature that links Covid jabs to sudden onset cancer. The truth is a cancer is going to show up in older populations eventually and MOST older people will have gotten jabs. Correlation is not causation. You may personally suspect a correlation but correlation isn't causation. It's like buying a black pickup and then suddenly noticing how many black pickups are on the road.

In fact most cancer patients are urged to get a Covid vaccine due to the fact they will have weakened immune systems

I am near the end of an excellent book written in 2007, "Dr. Mary's Monkey" by Edward T. Haslam. The author's father was a Professor of Orthopedic Surgery at Tulane University in New Orleans. His father was fully aware of the covert operations our government was involved in regarding the development of the polio vaccine. He would let small bits of information slip out, but refused to answer the son's questions for more details. It seems this boy was destined to find the truth. Over the course of many years he interviewed people, dug for documents, traveled to places of interest to gather pieces of information to put the 'mosaic' together, as he called it. The author became acquainted with many other people who really wanted to get to the truth, so they worked together at times. Other people who were personally involved with the covert operation, would call him with insider information.
It is an excellent book, with a myriad of characters, and plots and motives. The author makes you feel like you are with him wherever he finds himself, and whoever he is interacting with. He is a thorough investigative journalist, and does not assume anything.
Spoiler Alert----Bottom line is, the polio vaccine was grown on monkey kidneys, which carried a virus that caused cancer. Even though it was known the vaccine would cause soft tissue cancer, they rushed it through anyway, because they felt they needed something quickly to abate polio. This occurred between 1959 and 1964.

[Yodean]

Yodean, I can't quite square this attitude with your medical knowledge. No where have I found valid scientific literature that links Covid jabs to sudden onset cancer. The truth is a cancer is going to show up in older populations eventually and MOST older people will have gotten jabs. Correlation is not causation. You may personally suspect a correlation but correlation isn't causation. It's like buying a black pickup and then suddenly noticing how many black pickups are on the road.

In fact most cancer patients are urged to get a Covid vaccine due to the fact they will have weakened immune systems

There is a lot of medical data and physicians' opinions being actively suppressed. I would start by watching the videos - with a somewhat open mind, if possible - I have posted recently, in response to other subs. One is only two minutes, and another is two hours. They will at least give you some food for thought, and if you really want to know, just continue to research independent sites and certain speakers, etc.

Other subs have also posted good videos to peruse.

Another consideration is that medical data isn't always straightforward to interpret - there are issues of study design, statistical interpretation (or manipulation), whether the data is significant statistically but not clinically significant, whether the results are generalizable to a certain population or not, etc.

It takes a lot of work and experience to really know how to read a medical paper rigorously, and draw appropriate conclusions, as well as detect weaknesses in the study in question, etc.

I don't want to spend too much time on this stuff - don't want to repeat the whole Plato's Allegory of the Cave thing, as I went through a lot of unnecessary crap in 2020, including having a few polite Canadian policemen stop by my home on one occasion - although I am happy to post some of my thoughts and videos if they don't require too much time and effort, to those that seem to have the potential to understand.

At the end of the day, my spouse and I are healthy as horny horses, unjabbed. The list of our family/friends/acquaintances/associates that have suffered adverse jab side effects continue to grow, including two stroke deaths in healthy individuals.

You got double vaxxed +/- boostered(?), then supposedly "caught" a serious case of delta, then developed shingles ... and who knows what else that you haven't told me. Doesn't that make you think a little bit?

You may want to look up what a PCR test is, in the specific context of cv19 ... as well as the terms "pathogenic priming," "autoimmune enhancement," "natural T-cell immunity." And all the studies done around those topics that the mainstream press refuses to report, as well as their implications.

If you really want to know, look that sh*it up - it's really not that hard to find, if you have an open mind and really want to know. But it's not easy if you continue to believe the mainstream medical press.

Just go through some of the videos on this thread with a slightly open mind. Or even better, read this whole thread and go through all the clips and postings. Then make up your mind ... lots of good information on this thread.

The ticking bomb inside you prolly won't go off (you seem pretty healthy and generally lucky), but I'd rather not have one inside my body.

[Yodean]

https://youtu.be/OVrd1hWVpls

*****

Tangentially related, interesting example of what happens when one goes against Big Pharma/FDA or the Establishment.

[bpcw]

The majority only "go with the science", but what they fail to understand is what they are actually doing in the main is putting their full faith and trust in the machine that is governed by the elites. It's not science at all since they cannot demonstrate themselves the things they believe, it's purely a faith, no different from religion. Obviously I'm talking in the context of things like covid, cancer etc.

[Investor87]

Here are my 2 cents. Firstly I came late to the party and only recently got Covid. I did the FLCCC protocol with MB and it was very mild.

When Covid started I saw everyone looking to an “expert” to tell them what was true. I am no MD nor am trained in the sciences. I’m not a virologist or vaccinologist, etc. I’ve tried to read scientific papers and can’t make heads or tails of the abstract. I came to the conclusion that I need an expert to interpret the data for me (I know the word expert is not a popular word here)

If I need an expert then I need to vet them well, so I came up with three criteria they need to meet before I will believe their interpretation of the data.
1. They need to actually be an expert, be trained in a way that gives them the ability to do the research.
2. They need to have their own study of the science and not just parroting what another person is saying or just following a policy. They need to look at the actual data and have an opinion, if the study’s are well done, etc.
3. They can’t have a conflict of interest.

This brought a lot of clarity (and unpopularity) my way. This narrowed the people I would believe to a few doctor/scientist and they were all saying similar things.

[SOL]

The majority only "go with the science", but what they fail to understand is what they are actually doing in the main is putting their full faith and trust in the machine that is governed by the elites. It's not science at all since they cannot demonstrate themselves the things they believe, it's purely a faith, no different from religion. Obviously I'm talking in the context of things like covid, cancer etc.

Of topic, you can't save the majority no matter how hard you try. To be saved, one must seek salvation (as in Freedom). One must want it so badly that it becomes part of them; only these people will be willing to listen to information that shook up their entire belief system. The rest will crucify you for trying to destroy their illusions which they have so meticulously supported and nurtured via delusions such as experts know it all or I have to have faith in the system

And you are right bpcw most of western science, well anything after the 1950's is corrupt and as pointed out one has to know how to interpret the data. I remember one study of sugar intake and diabetes, the data was presented so well and they used fructose (this is a sugar that is so important, that once it crosses the blood brain barrier the the developing embryo's system refuses to allow it to flow back to the mother, the same does not hold true for Glucose.

As I stated the data was presented very nicely, and the conclusion was that fructose is harmful to diabetics and Pre-diabetics (whatever the hell that is supposed to be, I suppose it's the same as pre-pregnant). I decided to dig deeper and found that buried in the fine print, they used HFC (high corn fructose syrup), which is not even remotely connected to Fructose (real fruit sugar), HFCs are full of large starchy molecules. Fructose is actually good for anyone, but that is a different topic. This was done years ago, now imagine what they are doing today.

[SOL]

Here are my 2 cents. Firstly I came late to the party and only recently got Covid. I did the FLCCC protocol with MB and it was very mild.

When Covid started I saw everyone looking to an “expert” to tell them what was true. I am no MD nor am trained in the sciences. I’m not a virologist or vaccinologist, etc. I’ve tried to read scientific papers and can’t make heads or tails of the abstract. I came to the conclusion that I need an expert to interpret the data for me (I know the word expert is not a popular word here)

If I need an expert then I need to vet them well, so I came up with three criteria they need to meet before I will believe their interpretation of the data.
1. They need to actually be an expert, be trained in a way that gives them the ability to do the research.
2. They need to have their own study of the science and not just parroting what another person is saying or just following a policy. They need to look at the actual data and have an opinion, if the study’s are well done, etc.
3. They can’t have a conflict of interest.

This brought a lot of clarity (and unpopularity) my way. This narrowed the people I would believe to a few doctor/scientist and they were all saying similar things.

You are a critical thinker that is willing to do what it takes to find out the necessary data. The masses want to be spoonfed, taped on the butt, patted on the back and given a shot of whatever poison makes them tick and then they want to hear the narrative they have been programmed to hear. And it better start with, everything is going to be alright soon or we found a solution

[harryg]

the conclusion was that fructose is harmful to diabetics and Pre-diabetics (whatever the hell that is supposed to be, I suppose it's the same as pre-pregnant).

I just had to comment on the above text from SOL because it is so brilliant.






PS: Jack Dee (comedian) made a similar comment about the different programmes on his washing machine.

"Pre-wash! What is 'pre-wash'? Surely that's just wearing the clothes?"

[LoriPrecisely]

the conclusion was that fructose is harmful to diabetics and Pre-diabetics (whatever the hell that is supposed to be, I suppose it's the same as pre-pregnant).

I just had to comment on the above text from SOL because it is so brilliant.






PS: Jack Dee (comedian) made a similar comment about the different programmes on his washing machine.

"Pre-wash! What is 'pre-wash'? Surely that's just wearing the clothes?"

Cute, Harry, real cute!!!

[bpcw]

Ha ha, currently I'm pre-dead!

[Budge]

And now we know the type of error that led to C-19:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E7LpP00WEAcyxSN.jpg

[outof thebox]

And now we know the type of error that led to C-19:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E7LpP00WEAcyxSN.jpg

Great one

I just wish COVID-19 was a laughing matter, frigging Fauci and crew made sure it was a living hell

[MarkD]

Just picked this up over on Tweeter.

https://thefirstlightreport.com/2022/07 ... dium=email

Not aware there were any hearings underway. And I don't watch the telly for news at all.

[Yodean]

*****

Unfortunate trend ...

[AstuteShift]

*****

Unfortunate trend ...

Very true

Medicine should never be for profit incentives, but this a product of neo capitalism and money worshipping culture