RANDOM MUSINGS IIA
by Sol Palha
April 29, 2005
It
takes twenty years or more of peace to make a man;
it takes only twenty seconds of war to destroy him.
Baudouin I 1930-1993, King of the Belgians
We have
sat quietly, waited and watched hoping someone out there
would pay attention and make people understand the
implications of what Osama Bin-Laden said last year on
October. The news media played the story once or twice but
no one seemed to take time to analyse the significance of
his statements and their long-term implications. (We are
going to slowly tie this article into several different
investing concepts).
Osama
basically stated that he and his guerrillas bled Russia for
10 years and forced them into bankruptcy during their
occupation of Afghanistan. As a result Russia was forced to
withdraw because it could no longer afford to fight an
unseen enemy. He then went on to state how they had now
applied the same principle with the US. The September 9-11
attack cost them roughly $500,000 dollars, but the cost to
America was in excess of 450 billion. For a partial break
down of the costs of 9-11, click on this
link.
Simple
math will reveal that for every one dollar they spent we
lost almost a million dollars. Stop to let this sink in for
a second; the ratio of what they spent to what we lost is
mind-boggling. They could actually bankrupt a country by
just simply maintaining this cost ratio. That is exactly
what Bin Laden and his followers are currently doing. A
shoulder fired stinger missile costs about 50-60,000 dollars
and yet it can be used to bring down a multi million dollar
helicopter. In addition unlike the US army, which is
currently stretched thin, Bin Laden seems to have no problem
recruiting new candidates.
Now the
above situation is scary enough when one views the financial
implications but when we add in Iraq the picture simply
becomes terrifying. Just look at the cost of this war alone,
we have already gone through over 100 billion and the US has
put in another request for another 100-200 billion (this
figure is simply going to keep getting higher) just for this
year only.
Jan. 13 (Bloomberg) – The U.S. spent $102
billion through Sept. 30 on the invasion and occupation of
Iraq, with costs averaging $4.8 billion a month, the
Pentagon comptroller's office said today. ``It does not
necessarily reflect the true costs of the operations in
Iraq,'' Kosiak said. ``We may have some significant bills
yet to be paid for replacing some equipment worn out by
these operations.'' [See]
Conservative estimates have this war lasting anywhere from
5-10 years, it is costing us say 100billion a year, then
this war could cost us an additional one trillion dollars
(and we are being conservative here). The reality is that
this war is never going to end because the enemy is not
fixed, he cannot be seen and so it’s game of hide and seek.
Where the seekers pay in the millions to find the hiders who
can be easily replaced at a cost of a few thousand dollars.
One of
the main reasons this war is going to fail is because we are
trying to bring and forcefully implement our way of life in
the Middle East. Even before this war began we stated that
it would cost several times more then the official estimates
and last 10 times longer then their wildest estimates.
“Our
armies do come into your cities and lands as conquerors or
enemies but as liberators” who do you think made this
statement. If you think it was one of the big US
generals or George Bush you are completely wrong. It was a
British General by the name of Fredrick Maude in March 1917.
Subsequently they captured all the oil fields and massacred
thousands of Iraqis and established a so-called Democracy
(to the Iraqi people it must have looked more like a
dictatorship as founding one on blood is hardly the right
way to proceed). Fast forward, our closest allies today are
none other then the British and many Iraqis have not
forgotten what took place, so it’s no wonder that they are
skeptical of our intentions. This also is one of the main
reasons why there is so much antagonism directed towards the
US.
To understand why democracy is not a way
of life there we need to examine Islam in a bit more detail.
The word "ISLAM" is derived from the
Arabic words "salaam", which means peace and "taslim", which
means submission. The follower of Islam is a Muslim. The
word "Muslim" translated to English literally means "the
one with peace". To the Muslim it has a greater meaning,
Muslims believe that true peace is experienced only when
Mankind acknowledges, obeys and worships the Creator, i.e.
submits to the One God. So to the Muslim it means "the
one who submits in peace".
According to Muslims, Islam is the way of
God and the religion of all the prophets; from Adam to the
final prophet of God Muhammad (peace be upon them all). The
prophet Moses (peace be upon him) said to his people; "Shalom
I bring to you".
Shalom in Hebrew means Salaam (Arabic).
The prophet Jesus (peace be upon him) said to the people;
To become a Muslim a person has to
declare, " there is No god but Allah and Muhammad is His
servant and messenger."
This known as the Shahada or the bearing
of witness. The message of Islam is:
1. Truth
2. Peace
3. Justice
http://islam.web1000.com/articles/wordislam.htm
I spoke
to a few non-radical Muslims who respect all other religions
and have no desire to impose their views on anyone to verify
if the above information was accurate. They all agreed that
more or less it was a fair representation.
So in
essence Islam means submitting to God’s will and that God’s
law over rules any other law. Since democracy is essentially
the will of the masses (in other words the majority wins)
the people decide what is right or wrong. This leads to
direct conflict with Islam and by now we all know that to a
true Muslim, God’s will is supreme and must be obeyed above
all. . This debate has not really been resolved amongst
Muslims; should they obey God’s will all the time even
though it might conflict with some rules and regulations set
by men. Muslims with little exposure to the West say God’s
will is supreme. Muslims who are more westernized generally
lean towards democracy. However we all know that most
Muslims in the Middle East have very little exposure to
western culture; hence democracy is not well received by
most. So democracy by its nature could be said to be in
direct conflict with Islam and that is why perhaps there has
never ever been a democratic state or nation in the Middle
East. The radial Muslims are definitely going to take
advantage of this possible loophole to its fullest extent
and use it to promote their agenda.
If you
pay attention to the news the war on terrorism has taken
second place to the desire to bring democracy to the Middle
East. Hardly a day goes by without the D word (democracy)
being mentioned in some news broadcast. Now just stop and
think about this for a second do we really have the right to
tell them what they should do and how they should lead their
lives. Think about it this way, how would you feel if
suddenly an army of Muslims landed in Pennsylvania and
decided to force Islamic law onto everyone in that state.
Outrage, horror etc etc, we would be ready to take arms and
fight to the very end.
I would
like to stop here for one second just in case some of you
get the wrong idea and think that we are taking sides; we
are not. All we are doing is trying to take a
cross-cultural analytical look at the situation. What
most individuals do is that they take a subjective mono
cultural look at any given situation and then make a
decision based on faulty and warped data. The reason we are
spending so much time on this problem is so that you can
understand what a big mess we are in now and how this mess
is actually going to change the lifestyle of many Americans
over the next few years.
To make
matters worse it seems that we are now conducting covert
operations in Iran, with the intention of taking out most of
their nuclear producing facilities with a few smart bombs.
It seems that the pentagon has now taken control of the CIA
and can engage in covert operations without letting congress
know. Seymor Hersh of the New Yorker has written a
long article on this subject. The fact that the pentagon
took the time to respond to this article shows that there
must be some truth to it. [See]
While
Europe is trying to find a peaceful way to solve this
problem, America claims that some measure of force needs to
be applied to drive home the point that seeking nuclear
capability is not in Iran’s best interest. The question
comes down to this, how many wars we can fight. We are
already a debtor nation and the only way to pay for these
wars is to print more dollars; sooner or later the world is
going to get tired of getting paid in dollars that keep
losing their value at the speed of light. Wars are expensive
business and already we are involved in two wars, both of
which we have no chance of winning because we are fighting
an unseen enemy. One of them was enough to bring the great
nation of Russia to its knees and we are still looking for
new wars.
Never
before in History has the dollar lost value so fast (by the
way this dollar rally we have been talking about is just a
short to intermediate term play, long term the dollar is
definitely dead)
Let’s
look at the dollar VS hard assets since 2001 (from their
lows to their highs)
Conclusion
During
World War II raw materials soared up in value by over 400%
if we adjust for inflation raw materials have the potential
to go up by several thousand percentage points this time
round. We are also not fighting one war but two wars right
now and at the rate we are going, there is a very strong
likelihood that we will be engaging in a third one in the
not to distant future. If we ever attack Iran, the number
terrorist’s attacks will simply skyrocket. Iran has
long-range missiles and strong ties with Hezbollah and an
attack on Iran would certainly make these chaps see pure red
for a long time and no one knows how they would react. Thank
God we have not witnessed any suicide bombing acts in the US
yet, but such an attack on Iran could lead to such an event.
This is something that would have incalculable effects on
the American Psyche not to mention the huge economic cost.
The Europeans have been trying to negotiate with Iran but
have openly stated that these negotiations are bound to fail
if the United States does not participate.
The Europeans have been urging the Bush
Administration to join in these negotiations. The
Administration has refused to do so. The civilian leadership
in the Pentagon has argued that no diplomatic progress on
the Iranian nuclear threat will take place unless there is a
credible threat of military action. “The neocons say
negotiations are a bad deal,” a senior official of the
International Atomic Energy Agency (I.A.E.A.) told me. “And
the only thing the Iranians understand is pressure. And that
they also need to be whacked.”
The alternative would be to go to the
Security Council, but any resolution imposing sanctions
would likely be vetoed by China or Russia, and then “the
United Nations will be blamed and the Americans will say,
‘The only solution is to bomb.’”
[See]
We
suggest once again that you read the full article from the
New Yorker by clicking on the above link. The above
statements if true are very strong and will only promote
more distrust and animosity in the Middle East.
These
wars are going to have a serious effect on the lives of most
Americans. We are now at a turning point, there is no doubt
that the dollar is dead long term and now is the time to
slowly start moving some of your assets out of this country.
We are not talking about fleeing but just using the
principle our grandparents taught us of never putting all
our eggs in one basket. By the way you can still have
accounts overseas that are denominated in dollars if you are
looking to take advantage of the current dollar rally. You
could then switch them to a stronger currency. You can also
use these accounts to own Gold, Silver, palladium, energy
stocks etc. We envision strong foreign currency controls
being implemented in the US in the future and the movement
of money outside the country will be heavily restricted. For
US citizens, Canada is a good choice, its close and very
stable. There is nothing illegal about moving your money
overseas as long as you fill in all the paper work. You can
actually take more than 10k out of the country in the form
of Gold bullion or some other precious metal, but once again
as long as you fill in the appropriate paper work its fully
legal.
Implications of these wars
We are
only going to put up a partial list of these implications as
the rest are reserved for our subscribers.
1)
Real estate in the big cities is going to take a big
hit and tank. Surprisingly though rural real estate might
thrive. Perhaps one of the reasons could be the safety
factor.
2)
The Swiss franc is going to become a lot stronger in
the not too distant future. Switzerland is a neutral nation
(they have not had a major war for several decades); we
believe that it’s possible to see the day where it will take
2 dollars to buy a Swiss franc. Another neutral Nation is
New Zealand. The time to take positions in these currencies
is after this dollar rally is over and done with.
3)
Oil could trade as high as 300 dollars a barrel.
Sometime last year we had initially put a price of 100
dollars a barrel, but then we stated that recent
developments pointed too much higher prices and the
developments keep getting worse.
All
these prices we are putting up are very long term price
targets, minimum time frame 3 years to a maximum of 10
years)
I hate
war as only a soldier who has lived it can,
only as one who has seen its brutality, its futility, its
stupidity.
Dwight D. Eisenhower 1890-1969, Thirty-fourth
President of the USA |