Random Musings 1
by Sol Palha
December 27, 2004
A
relationship, I think, is like a shark, you know? It has to
constantly move forward or it dies. And I think what we got
on our hands is a dead shark.
~
Woody Allen 1935-, American Director,
Screenwriter, Actor, Comedian
We are going to end of the Year with something new, it’s a
series that we have decided to title “random Musings” and it
will be a collection of thoughts, observations and patterns
and their relation or impact on our daily lives. Off course
whenever possible we will attempt to tie them in to the
financial markets.
Affinity For Negativity
We will examine this topic very
briefly because it does play an important role in investing.
Individuals as a rule seem far more inclined to listen to
and act on negative information rather than on positive
info. Don’t believe me; allow me to illustrate this point to
you.
We have 4 glasses of water on the
table. Someone states that the water in one of the glasses
came from a Jug that had a dead fly in it. Now mind you, you
don’t even know this person, yet immediately almost everyone
would walk away from those glasses, even if they were dying
of thirst. Almost no one would try to verify if this
information was indeed true.
Now someone comes to you and
states, hey one of those glasses contains water from the
purest spring in the Swiss Alps. I am almost sure that no
one would rush to drink all 4 glasses in an attempt to
secure the purest water.
Take it a step further. We have
gloom doom arguments on how the financial world is going to
end and immediately our ears perk up. Yet let someone come
up with an argument stating that everything is fine and we
don’t want to listen or at most we will only listen with one
ear.
How about market crashes. Gurus
coming out stating that the market is going to crash and
burn and the masses panic and start buying puts and dumping
their quality shares. Yet if someone comes and states that
the market is going to rise, they don’t pay attention to the
person. (Off course it can work the other way too, depending
on the current sentiment and perception of the crowds.)
This is what we experienced when
we publicly stated that we expected the Dow to rise to over
10,500 last year, when it was still under 9k. No one wanted
to hear anything new and so after our article debuted on
Financial Sense and Gold Eagle we were flooded with emails
stating that we had lost our minds. I remember that I was in
a humorous mood at that time so I answered some of the
emails with the following line:
It takes one to know one.
Life was, is and never will be
fair. Life is what you make of it. So don’t fret about
things you cannot control; instead look for ways to take
advantage of these situations. You have only one option;
instead of trying to be a Good Samaritan and finding an
early grave, just simply find out what the long-term trend
is and follow it. With or
without manipulation there is always a trend, and if you
stay with the trend you have nothing to worry about.
Random
musings on Experts.
Everybody loves to use the word
'expert' all the time to claim they know something extra or
have knowledge of the inner workings in a specific field or
area. Now if you want to turn the tables around on them all
you have to say is the following: But first repeat the word
expert slowly and then spell it like it sounds and viola you
get EX SPURT, which
basically means that this expert is nothing but spurt that
never was, in other words they are finished even before they
have even begun. Isn’t it strange that most so called
financial experts fall into the EX SPURT category.
We use words to secretly define what we know to be true but
refuse to believe or see with our open eyes. To live in an
illusion is far easier than to step out and deal with
reality. It’s said that
reality bites but then we could say illusions swallow.
In reality there is no such thing as an expert, because who
are you measuring yourself. Anyone can be expert if they
measure themselves against the ignorant and blind. There are
only advanced market students or advanced life students. We
can never stop learning for when we do, senility is very
close at hand.
The secret
programmed desire to lose Syndrome Part 1
So far
we have looked at the laws of paradoxes, then we expanded on
these laws and now we will slowly start to look at the
'secret programmed desire to lose Syndrome.'
From
the day we are born we are inundated with information, most
of it is nothing but a mismatch of cultural values,
religious values and what is perceived to be the norm during
that time period. For the most part 80% or more of this
information is truly biased and untested in terms of science
and logic. What we mean is that we are told to believe
things on the basis of “well that’s what our family did
for generations and that’s how things have always been.”
As time
goes by we are told how we should behave, how we should eat,
what we should eat, who our friends should be, what type of
career to aim for, what is socially acceptable and what is
not, around what age we should look to settle down and what
type of woman or man would we should choose to settle down
with. We are also taught that working for the group or
community at large is the right thing to do and that being
selfish is very bad.
We are taught that we should
dedicate our lives to one person and actually promise that
we will do this, even though we have a very hard time just
keeping our new year's
resolutions. We are not
told that instead of saying I promise, we should instead say
I will try my very best, but being weak and human it is
possible that I might fail along the line. This promise in
most cases is guaranteed to achieve the exact opposite
result and if one looks at the statistics, the evidence is
overwhelmingly in favour of this. It’s this fear of trying
to live up to an ideal that most of us know that we cannot
live up to that actually ends up in causing the relationship
to end. The most successful relationships are those ones in
which a whole different approach has been taken; the key to
their success is that in general the individuals involved
are happy with themselves and are not looking to find
happiness in another but simply enhance it.
Today
we will just dip into these topics and explore each one in
more detail along the line.
Just remember we are not telling
you what to do, or that we are right or that we know it all.
All we are doing is sharing our opinion and we are willing
to admit in advance that we could be wrong and if proven to
be wrong we will readily admit to our wrongdoings. Life is
not about trying to prove you are the best, but simply a
quest for new information and looking at old information
with a new set of eyes.
Lets
start of by looking at the working for the benefit group
principle and how being selfish is supposed to be bad.
One big
flaw with this principle is that how could you possibly know
what’s good for the group if you have no idea of what’s good
for you. So blindly you try to work for the benefit of the
group and since we have millions of misguided individuals
working under a misguided premise, it’s a mega recipe for
disaster. That is why we have so many depressed people, lost
people, people who feel like they have no purpose in life,
etc.
This
somehow blends with the paradox principle, in order to
succeed the law of paradoxes states that you must be ready
and willing to embrace your failures. So taking this one
step further, in order to share you must be willing to
understand and embrace the principle of selfishness. In
order to work for the group you must be ready and willing to
work for the benefit of yourself and the list goes on.
So what
we should be taught is that first we should look out for our
self-interests and when we are okay we should take that
knowledge and share it with others. That being selfish in
moderation is not only good but also a vital necessity to
our survival. For if one does not care about one’s health or
wealth, how could they care about the health or wealth of
the group. We suggest you read the book called “The
Virtue of Selfishness” by Ann Rand.
Our final
musing will be on the following topic:
The necessity of losing and why
it makes sense and cents.
Imagine
for a second that you got up and from this day hence forward
you just kept winning every time you played the markets.
Sooner then later winning would become boring, because you
would not have anything to compare your wins to. The reason
a win feels so good is because you compare it to a point in
time when you lost something. Not only do you bask in the
new felt emotion (because you remember the pain of losing),
but you also feel incredibly great because of the financial
windfall from that win. What we are trying to state here is
that losing or failing is an important and integral part of
winning and success and that without the other life would be
drab and dry.
However, what happens over time
is that most individuals seem to think that they can do
nothing but fail or lose. The way to stop this evil process
is to immediately understand the purpose of losing and
failing. When you lose or fail it means you have done
something wrong, you are being given a second chance to
evaluate where you might have strayed or erred. Most of us
instead just keep doing the same thing that made us
experience our first loss and we hope that sooner or later
we will hit the mother load by luck. If we examine the
reason we lost or failed we see exactly what it was that
caused us to fall off the tracks, and even if we don’t
succeed on the next attempt, we will at least make sure that
we never ever repeat the same mistake again. Through
constant analysis of our mistakes we can finally develop a
system or systems that can with patience and persistence
help us win in the markets and more importantly help us with
the most important battle in our lives: the quest to find
happiness which is really nothing other than the quest to
find inner peace. Remember this too, nothing good ever comes
easy; if it did it was not worth it in the first place.
Imagination was given man to compensate for what he is not,
and a sense of humor to console him for what he is.
~
Francis Bacon 1561-1626, British Philosopher, Essayist,
Statesman
|