What science says about it?

User avatar
SOL
Power VS Force
Power VS Force
Posts: 3267
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2020 7:32 am

Re: What science says about it?

Post by SOL »

This is not a bad brand, simple and good for those that don't like their coffee too bitter

https://cutt.ly/kkv33hb



Upping the Ante

If you want some really good coffee Organic Blue Mountain Coffee is a great way to reward yourself on a good trade or when you are sitting and waiting for the next play. You don't have to get this brand, there are other brands that are just as good.

https://cutt.ly/ikv346v
When the words short term appear under any post; the same conditions listed in the Market update under the short term category apply

The end is always near; its the beginning and how you live each moment that counts the most
User avatar
Triplethought
Black Belt
Black Belt
Posts: 891
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2020 4:45 am

Re: What science says about it?

Post by Triplethought »

SOL wrote: Tue Dec 29, 2020 3:22 pm
Vitamin E, as its name indicates, was the fifth type of "vitamin" factor to be identified, and it received its name in 1922, even though its chemical structure hadn't been identified. The public quickly understood and accepted that certain substances in food were essential for life and health, so by 1940 practically all physicians were recommending the use of nutritional supplements.
One thing I always keep in mind is that older and especially "ancient" medical wisdom is likely obsolete. That's why I'm unimpressed when some new vendor of the week touts some "ancient herbal remedy the Chinese have known about for thousands of years". My Chinese friends always smile and say "In China everyone wants western medicine"

Since Vitamin E might exacerbate prostate cancer (which is one I'm genetically prone to) I tend to do "all things in moderation. ... Including moderation"

https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... roperties.
Current atmospheric levels of CO2 (400ppm) are much lower than 500 million years ago (3000-9000ppm).
User avatar
stefk
Black Belt
Black Belt
Posts: 743
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2020 6:49 pm

Re: What science says about it?

Post by stefk »

Triplethought wrote: Wed Feb 10, 2021 6:30 pm
SOL wrote: Tue Dec 29, 2020 3:22 pm
Vitamin E, as its name indicates, was the fifth type of "vitamin" factor to be identified, and it received its name in 1922, even though its chemical structure hadn't been identified. The public quickly understood and accepted that certain substances in food were essential for life and health, so by 1940 practically all physicians were recommending the use of nutritional supplements.
One thing I always keep in mind is that older and especially "ancient" medical wisdom is likely obsolete. That's why I'm unimpressed when some new vendor of the week touts some "ancient herbal remedy the Chinese have known about for thousands of years". My Chinese friends always smile and say "In China everyone wants western medicine"

Since Vitamin E might exacerbate prostate cancer (which is one I'm genetically prone to) I tend to do "all things in moderation. ... Including moderation"

https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supple ... roperties.

https://bluecure.org/foodpage/carrot/
Eat a raw carrot everyday, its a good weapon against prostate cancer.

Whats up doc?
« To plant a garden is to believe in tomorrow »
– Audrey Hepburn
User avatar
Yodean
Jeidi
Jeidi
Posts: 2685
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:02 pm

Re: What science says about it?

Post by Yodean »

This ten-minute clip is quite entertaining and informative:

https://youtu.be/D4eFdtxBjmw
Buy Fear, Sell Euphoria. The Neonatal Calf undergoes an agonizing birthing, while the Bear falls into hibernation.
User avatar
stefk
Black Belt
Black Belt
Posts: 743
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2020 6:49 pm

Re: What science says about it?

Post by stefk »

Science and scientists are also under influence of mass psychology. But in science, consensus doesn't mean scientific truth.

https://whyclimatechanges.com/impossible/

since 2015, a premium of 10K dollars is offered to the first person who can demonstrate by experiment that warming since 1970 could be explained by the rise of CO2 concentration. No one can prove it.

https://youtu.be/l3g9VM6Ma_E

In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.” Michael Crichton
« To plant a garden is to believe in tomorrow »
– Audrey Hepburn
User avatar
stefk
Black Belt
Black Belt
Posts: 743
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2020 6:49 pm

Re: What science says about it?

Post by stefk »

""The unfortunate fact is that the greenhouse-warming theory freight train left the station long ago and is still gaining momentum at it heads for a monumental crash with scientific and political reality.""
« To plant a garden is to believe in tomorrow »
– Audrey Hepburn
Post Reply