anti Trump bias everywhere

[stefk]

https://youtu.be/awmF40BYNAQ?si=rzq2bEeT9F4kqtkx

I notice there are anti Trump bias everywhere. Its normal, we are not accustomed with sinceriry coming from politicians.

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/brea ... -strategy/

""""These documents have value not because they present “strategy,” but because they offer observers some insight into how a particular administration wants to position itself with the public. Here, the new document is helpful, because it highlights where Trumpian ideology threatens to subvert U.S. national interests. “Mass migration” is deemed to be the major external threat to the United States—more than China, Russia, or terrorism. And the document’s often antiseptic prose veers off a cliff when it comes to Europe, which it claims is facing “civilizational erasure.” The document makes clear that the major transatlantic divide these days is not between the United States and Europe; it is between transatlantic liberals and transatlantic illiberals."""

I will translate in a nutshell the speeches and the documents from the Trump administration. If you are an open minded (open legs) leftist liberal, dont read it.

YOU EUROPEAN LEADERS, ARE A BUNCH OF MOTHERSFUCKERS, YOU ARE WORKING AGAINST YOUR PEOPLE, YOU ARE CORRUPTED, YOU ARE STUPID,

et voilà, I like it, I like this president. Yes I know, he is there to polarize the world, he obeys to his shadows masters, but he is far better than our liberal and communist european politicians. .......

..........................................................................................................

https://www.politico.eu/article/documen ... sets-loan/

210 billions for Ukraine, and they want to steal this money from Russians !! Excuse me for the french and german subscribers, but France and Germany are the most stupid nations in the humanity.

[stefk]

https://youtu.be/R8ZwDq5gM0Y?si=Jf_R7XsKh2EU1iV0

Look at this german clown, he is nothing compared to Trump.

[SOL]

Stekf, your points carry water. Europe, and earlier America, lost discipline in how immigration was and should have been handled. Legal entry is one thing. Uncontrolled waves are another issue. Older generations had a clear word for it: an invasion. Today, the term is treated as taboo. People are pushed into borrowed; I think forced narratives are a better term, through media, social pressure, and constant indoctrination. If you look only from that angle, blame seems simple. But the deeper fault lies with unchecked money creation. The more money they print, the more chaos, the more polarisation and that environment sets up the foundation for terrible deeds.

If Europe moves to use Russian funds, the message to the world will be severe. It will signal that Europe cannot be trusted with capital, and money will flee from Europe like a sinking ship. Unlike the United States, Europe has neither economic nor military strength.

I am not going to get into the moral issue regarding Russia’s actions, but focus on international law, which does not allow confiscation without a valid legal victory. You cannot take assets because you dislike the owner. The United States pushed this boundary, and the bond market responded. China reduced its exposure and shifted into gold. Europe has far less room to absorb that kind of blow, and there are already rumours that the funds may have been used.

The French, based on polls, don’t like Macron; he holds power with barely 11 per cent support because their system allows for massive manipulation. He forms tricky alliances to stay in control.

Germany risks provoking a country that has not forgotten the last war.

Polarisation keeps rising because the debt keeps growing. Cut the debt, and the outlook will start to improve, because Common sense will begin to return. They will not do it because there is too much money to be made from fleecing the public.




Here is the legal framework that protects every nation’s assets from seizure under international law. Once you step outside that framework, you signal that rules no longer matter, and the entire system begins to unravel. When one exception is allowed, every state understands it can be next, and that is when the absolute chaos starts.

1. Sovereign immunity and property protection
Under customary international law, sovereign states’ assets (especially central bank reserves) are protected from enforcement or seizure without due legal process. Foreign sovereign immunity generally shields state assets from being taken by another state’s courts or authorities absent specific legal grounds. https://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads ... e-1616.pdf

2. Confiscation vs. freeze distinction
International law (and statements from EU officials) treats freezing assets under sanctions as distinct from confiscating or using them without consent or legal judgement. Many legal experts argue outright confiscation would violate international law because there is no established mechanism to strip ownership without judgment or treaty basis. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/ ... 908_EN.pdf


3. International principle of due process
Most legal analyses on this topic emphasise that taking sovereign assets without a court process or an internationally agreed legal mechanism risks breaching principles like sovereign immunity and due process, and could trigger lawsuits or counterclaims. https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025 ... ian-assets

4. State positions and official statements
EU leaders and institutions (e.g., Christine Lagarde, Italian PM) have explicitly tied proposals to respect for international law, noting that confiscating Russia’s frozen assets outright would violate international norms and could expose countries to legal liability. https://www.reuters.com/world/italy-say ... 025-10-22/


So, as a result of all this chaos, rubbish, and mischief, the resource remobilisation war will only gather more traction. If the trend keeps accelerating, silver challenging 120 is not a fantasy.