Insights into the COVID Pandemic

[SOL]

Along with Moderna (MRNA) having already developed a shot to reverse Miocarditis we have this

https://www.wbbjtv.com/2023/02/02/blood ... procedure/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nd823rHUDzg

Scientists not backing Covid jabs for 12 to 15-year-olds

The UK's vaccine advisory body has refused to give the green light to vaccinating healthy children aged 12-15 years on health grounds alone.

The JCVI said children were at such a low risk from the virus that jabs would offer only a marginal benefit.

The UK's four chief medical officers have now been asked to have the final say, and to consider the wider impact on schools and society.

Health Secretary Sajid Javid said a decision would be made shortly.

The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation did advise widening the existing vaccine programme to include an extra 200,000 teenagers with specific underlying conditions.

Doctors identified that children with chronic heart, lung and liver conditions were at much higher risk of Covid than healthy children.

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-58438669

Concerns over integrity of mRNA molecules in some covid-19 vaccines

Documents leaked from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) following a cyber attack in December show that some early commercial batches of Pfizer-BioNTech’s covid-19 vaccine had lower than expected levels of intact mRNA molecules.

These molecules instruct our cells to make a harmless piece of coronavirus protein, triggering an immune response and protecting us from infection if the real virus enters our bodies.

The complete, intact mRNA molecule is essential to the potency of the vaccine.

But in a special report for The BMJ today, journalist Serena Tinari shows that the EMA was concerned about the difference in quality between clinical batches and proposed commercial batches of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.

Specifically, EMA had major concerns over unexpectedly low quantities (around 55%) of intact mRNA in batches of the vaccine developed for commercial production.

It is an issue relevant not just to Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine but also to those produced by Moderna, CureVac, and others, as well as a “second generation” mRNA vaccine being pursued by Imperial College London.

In an email dated 23 November, a high ranking EMA official outlined a raft of issues. In short, commercial manufacturing was not producing vaccines to the specifications expected, and regulators were unsure of the implications on safety and efficacy.

EMA responded by filing two “major objections” with Pfizer, along with a host of other questions it wanted addressed.

Ultimately, on 21 December, EMA authorised Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine and a report published on its website, noted, “the quality of this medicinal product, submitted in the emergency context of the current (covid-19) pandemic, is considered to be sufficiently consistent and acceptable.”

However, it’s unclear how the agency’s concerns were satisfied, writes Tinari.

The BMJ asked Pfizer, Moderna, and CureVac, as well as several regulators, what percentage mRNA integrity they consider acceptable for vaccines against covid-19.

None offered any specifics, and in subsequent correspondence, EMA, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Canadian medicines regulator Health Canada all stated that specific information related to the acceptability criteria is confidential.
https://www.bmj.com/company/newsroom/co ... -vaccines/

[scott]

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

Why no one trusts the scientific establishment — or the media
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/why-n ... 7ca27e552c

[bpcw]

He's getting quite humorous now.

My favourite line "make sure you don't think for yourself"

Pfizer covid vaccine side effects:
https://youtu.be/-FK17NU4_r8

[Eric]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nd823rHUDzg

That video is a year old. He's back and tweeting up a storm.

https://mobile.twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/with_replies

[Yodean]

"In the Pfizer Phase 3 trial, there was a 40% increase in ACM in the vaccinated group. They killed an estimated 7 people for every person they saved from COVID!
In the Pfizer Phase 3 trial, there were a total of 21 deaths in the vaccine group and 15 deaths in the placebo group.

*****

Pfizer is doomed! For a while, at least. May a modicum of justice prevail ...

Barron's covers are pretty good contrarian indicators.

[Yodean]

*****
https://twitter.com/DowdEdward/status/1 ... 9355682816

*****

Dowd did some gr8 work - used actuarial data for the above. Actuarial data for this is quite conservative, so likely underestimating by > 20% to 50%.

Egregious.

[bpcw]

This is why you shouldn't trust these scientists, huge denial and hidden agenda. Richard Dawkins once said, after reading Darwin's book on evolution that at last he had something to support his atheism, hardly a scientific basis, demonstrates he is philosophically an atheist and not scientifically, he basically hates God, anyway the video is more about Covid and the pseudo science that we were given

https://youtu.be/WCLR32agbsg

[AstuteShift]

This is why you shouldn't trust these scientists, huge denial and hidden agenda. Richard Dawkins once said, after reading Darwin's book on evolution that at last he had something to support his atheism, hardly a scientific basis, demonstrates he is philosophically an atheist and not scientifically, he basically hates God, anyway the video is more about Covid and the pseudo science that we were given

https://youtu.be/WCLR32agbsg

In the end, this Covid experiment was a fine example of the boy who cried wolf too many times

I remember emailing SOL what a life generational opportunity this was during March of 2020 and boy was it.

We should all be jumping for joy if another manufactured crisis materializes, the way this market is moving it will likely recover 5x faster or even more

[bpcw]

This is why you shouldn't trust these scientists, huge denial and hidden agenda. Richard Dawkins once said, after reading Darwin's book on evolution that at last he had something to support his atheism, hardly a scientific basis, demonstrates he is philosophically an atheist and not scientifically, he basically hates God, anyway the video is more about Covid and the pseudo science that we were given

In the end, this Covid experiment was a fine example of the boy who cried wolf too many times

I remember emailing SOL what a life generational opportunity this was during March of 2020 and boy was it.

We should all be jumping for joy if another manufactured crisis materializes, the way this market is moving it will likely recover 5x faster or even more

I agree but my point was to highlight what a sham a lot of the scientific community are. Over the decades people have rightly come to distrust many of the institutions such as politics, government, education, media but perceived scientists as only out for the truth and so could be afforded a lot of trust. Hence where the saying 'trusting the science'. This most of us know on this forum was bs when it comes to covid, and was politically motivated at best and at the worst quite nefarious in nature. I'm also trying to extend this to the forum to understand that most of the scientific community when it comes to the bigger questions such as where did life come from, evolution, the universe etc. is not simply a motivation for truth but is steered by other forces, such as a philosophical position on God, as well as other agendas.

Richard Dawkins in this interview demonstrates a denial of the facts though he claims to be lead only by science. The vaccines were a complete lie and yet he promotes science as being glorious in coming up with them so quickly even though they were useless in the main. He has to have his arm twisted to admit lockdowns might not have been a good idea, making excuses rather than admitting they simply got it wrong and should have been upfront from the start and admitted they didn't have the answers.

So if we cannot trust them with something provable such as covid, how on earth can we simply take what they say for granted what they say on the universe and evolution and many other things. They know for example the fine tuning argument for our universe is impossible to get round so a new theory that's become popular is the multiverse, perhaps trillions of universes coming into existence every second so one is bound to look like ours. This is simply kicking the can down the road because you don't want to face the fact that the universe could have been created by an intelligent designer, pure denial, and nothing to do with the evidence presented.

Now I will stop preaching and have my breakfast!

[SOL]

Deep down, it seems that many people are aware of the prevalence of deception and manipulation in our world. Even when the truth is presented, it often contains a mix of fact and fluff. What's truly concerning is that the influential figures no longer play by the old rules. They have mastered Mass Psychology (AKA a Black MP ) to such an extent that understanding their underlying motives requires extensive analysis. Though challenging, it used to be somewhat easier to discern these hidden intentions than it is today. Today I have to invest 3X more time to distinguish them.

These influential figures employ the illusion of choice to make it seem like they are empowering individuals. However, the options presented are designed to keep people in their current state or lead to their downfall rather than offering genuine solutions or better outcomes. The provided solutions are deliberately designed to lead to negative outcomes, serving only to deceive and manipulate.


If we take a step back and consider everything, we may question what has changed. Undoubtedly, the outlook was significantly brighter 20, 40, and 60 years ago. It becomes apparent that the most significant change is the money supply. As the money supply increases, the overall outlook tends to worsen, as we predicted years ago.

Another substantial change has been the emergence of social media and its impact on the population. With more people connected and many still unaware of the manipulation at play, the influential figures have essentially won the game regarding the average person. Manipulating the masses has become remarkably easy in today's world. Therefore, it is crucial to approach everything we read, see, and hear with scepticism, particularly if it originates from a multibillion-dollar corporation. To them, individuals are mere dollar symbols. Hence, it is essential to verify information meticulously, ideally checking it more than three times.


Furthermore, it is unwise to wear our emotions on our sleeves. Although money holds importance, it is ultimately meaningless if we remain unaware and controlled. True freedom is invaluable, something many fail to comprehend.

Only children and babies appear to grasp its significance. Perhaps that is why babies cry so much—they yearn to communicate something but lack the means to do so. By the time they gain the ability, they have already forgotten.


COVIDs primary purpose was not to cause physical harm but instead served as an experiment to manipulate and control the crowd. They've been poisoning the food, water, and information we receive for decades. The main objective was to test if they could convince us to give up our freedom willingly, and unfortunately, they found that money and fear can indeed sway the masses.

As a result, it's expected that chaos will ensue in the Western world. They'll be using AI to trigger large-scale events that will cause panic and extreme emotions, all to drain your wallets and play with your Emotions/mindset.

Focus on the now; that is all you have and will ever have. Tomorrow might come, and yesterday is gone, but the now is here and accessible.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5e6Vria ... Motivation

[bpcw]

Deep down, it seems that many people are aware of the prevalence of deception and manipulation in our world. Even when the truth is presented, it often contains a mix of fact and fluff. What's truly concerning is that the influential figures no longer play by the old rules. They have mastered Mass Psychology (AKA a Black MP ) to such an extent that understanding their underlying motives requires extensive analysis. Though challenging, it used to be somewhat easier to discern these hidden intentions than it is today. Today I have to invest 3X more time to distinguish them.

These influential figures employ the illusion of choice to make it seem like they are empowering individuals. However, the options presented are designed to keep people in their current state or lead to their downfall rather than offering genuine solutions or better outcomes. The provided solutions are deliberately designed to lead to negative outcomes, serving only to deceive and manipulate.


If we take a step back and consider everything, we may question what has changed. Undoubtedly, the outlook was significantly brighter 20, 40, and 60 years ago. It becomes apparent that the most significant change is the money supply. As the money supply increases, the overall outlook tends to worsen, as we predicted years ago.

Another substantial change has been the emergence of social media and its impact on the population. With more people connected and many still unaware of the manipulation at play, the influential figures have essentially won the game regarding the average person. Manipulating the masses has become remarkably easy in today's world. Therefore, it is crucial to approach everything we read, see, and hear with scepticism, particularly if it originates from a multibillion-dollar corporation. To them, individuals are mere dollar symbols. Hence, it is essential to verify information meticulously, ideally checking it more than three times.


Furthermore, it is unwise to wear our emotions on our sleeves. Although money holds importance, it is ultimately meaningless if we remain unaware and controlled. True freedom is invaluable, something many fail to comprehend.

Only children and babies appear to grasp its significance. Perhaps that is why babies cry so much—they yearn to communicate something but lack the means to do so. By the time they gain the ability, they have already forgotten.


COVIDs primary purpose was not to cause physical harm but instead served as an experiment to manipulate and control the crowd. They've been poisoning the food, water, and information we receive for decades. The main objective was to test if they could convince us to give up our freedom willingly, and unfortunately, they found that money and fear can indeed sway the masses.

As a result, it's expected that chaos will ensue in the Western world. They'll be using AI to trigger large-scale events that will cause panic and extreme emotions, all to drain your wallets and play with your Emotions.

Focus on the now; that is all you have and will ever have. Tomorrow might come, and yesterday is gone, but the now is here and accessible.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5e6Vria ... Motivation

Nice synopsis Sol and I totally agree, I was focusing more on the scientific community who are largely manipulated themselves. Someone like Richard Dawkins is nowhere near the player's you are referring to and is far easier to discern his motives. Though you went off on a tangent it was a most interesting one!

As far as time is concerned, I have logged how work time I spent working over the last month and on average is 4 hours a week, probably a quiet month for me but I doubt I do more than 10 hours a week on a busy month. Time is the greatest commodity and I don't want to waste it working like mad for a tomorrow/retirement that might never come or my health is poor, I can so I will. I live a very contented life.

[SOL]

. Someone like Richard Dawkins is nowhere near the player's you are referring to and is far easier to discern his motives.

Richard, in essence, is nothing more than a dork, easily discernible within a minute, with no inherent complexity except for his own inflated belief in his significance. However, my reference was not to him, but rather to the shadowy players who remain concealed, their faces and names never brought to the forefront..

As far as time is concerned, I have logged how work time I spent working over the last month and on average is 4 hours a week, probably a quiet month for me but I doubt I do more than 10 hours a week on a busy month. Time is the greatest commodity and I don't want to waste it working like mad for a tomorrow/retirement that might never come or my health is poor, I can so I will. I live a very contented life.

blimey, mate! You're a proper wise bloke, ain't ya? BPCW, you know your onions, you do!

Oh, time, if only there were a means to extract a little more from its grasp. Alas, it merely tightens its grip upon us, gradually draining the very essence of life from these mortal bodies.

Two sayings come to mind

Time is a great storyteller; it reveals the truth and then it kills
Seeking to gain more time, yet in vain, like chasing shadows in the Welsh mist.

[bpcw]

I have my moments where I worry but I then do a quick reset, bit like rebooting a PC!

Just found out my brother who is 60 is having a 3 month sabbatical from work after working 11 hour days, he retired once and worked a 1.5 acre plot of land to be more sustainable but decided to volunteer for a charity 1 day a work, pretty admirable but then started working paid for 3 days a week and trying to juggle it with the land and has now ended up back where he started when he was fulltime. His wife has had heart complications recently and has been juggling a private psychiatry practice, teaching it and doing a PHD just because she never got the chance. All this is born out of insecurity in my opinion, a need to be busy to constantly prove one's worth, getting a PHD that you don't need so you can have another few letters on the end of your name, never mind it's on your gravestone! Lots of knowledge but no wisdom when it comes to the biggest decisions in life, intellectual foolishness.

My brother has put the heart issues of my sister-in-law down to stress, I have suggested it could also be the covid vaccines, this was all correspondence via messaging, not heard back after this suggestion, hardly talked to him much before, guess that might be less now! He got angry with me when I had a different opinion on covd a couple of years ago!

The number count is going up progressively amongst my family and friends with unexpected health issues, that's 3 heart issues and 2 strokes so far.

[MarkD]

https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/shoul ... sv-vaccine

Cytokeine storm 2.0

[bpcw]

https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/shoul ... sv-vaccine

Cytokeine storm 2.0

And will we be murdering older people like our grannies by not taking the vaccine!