Methlyene blue

[Yodean]

Thanks a lot Yodean, my wife had 2 shots of the AstraZeneca vaccine, so not mRNA type, not sure if this makes a difference?

We're in uncharted territory at this point, so the following are just some of my speculations.

The AstraZeneca cv19 vaccine is a viral vector vaccine (like the Johnson & Johnson vaccine).

For this type of vaccine, material from the cv19 virus is placed in a modified version of a different virus (viral vector). The viral vector gives your cells instructions to make copies of the cv19 S protein. Once your cells display the S proteins on their surfaces, your immune system responds by creating antibodies.

In the case of AstraZeneca's cv19 vax, it uses a chimpanzee adenovirus to do the above.

The AZ jab still ends up messing around with your wife's natural (God-given, I might add) genetic material inside her cells in places that a natural exposure to a coronavirus would not.

The delivery mechanism is different vs. the mRNA jabs, but the end results are likely similar.

From what I have seen thus far, the number of shots seems to be more important as a predictor of potential adverse events, compared to the specific type of vax. Once you start going over 2 jabs, there is a significant increase in adverse effects.

The data isn't robust wrt to type of vax with the worse adverse side-effect profile, but besides # of shots, I suspect the order goes something like this: Moderna>Pfizer>AZ>JNJ>NovaVax; this particular ranking is completely speculative on my part, and subject to change, assuming more data is allowed to make its way to my feeds;

[SOL]

In that regard, I am concerned about TTH as he has gone silent. He reportedly took four shots. Has anyone been in contact with him recently? On a more positive note, perhaps he is just on holiday at a trendy and stylish resort.

[Yodean]

In that regard, I am concerned about TTH as he has gone silent. He reportedly took four shots. Has anyone been in contact with him recently? On a more positive note, perhaps he is just on holiday at a trendy and stylish resort.

Yep, I've been wondering about YoungAnakin as well. Last time he posted here, he was still in the "Window of Death" post-5th jab (I think he got five?).

Of course, he has a new ball and chain and is likely busy with dealing with the proceeds of his inheritance, as well as his money-lending and other businesses.

[Budge]

In that regard, I am concerned about TTH as he has gone silent. He reportedly took four shots. Has anyone been in contact with him recently? On a more positive note, perhaps he is just on holiday at a trendy and stylish resort.

Yep, I've been wondering about YoungAnakin as well. Last time he posted here, he was still in the "Window of Death" post-5th jab (I think he got five?).

Of course, he has a new ball and chain and is likely busy with dealing with the proceeds of his inheritance, as well as his money-lending and other businesses.

I do hope he's okay, but have to say (in my most sensitive style) 4 or 5 shots means he put himself in for the Darwin Awards Sweepstakes.

[bpcw]

Thanks a lot Yodean, my wife had 2 shots of the AstraZeneca vaccine, so not mRNA type, not sure if this makes a difference?

We're in uncharted territory at this point, so the following are just some of my speculations.

The AstraZeneca cv19 vaccine is a viral vector vaccine (like the Johnson & Johnson vaccine).

For this type of vaccine, material from the cv19 virus is placed in a modified version of a different virus (viral vector). The viral vector gives your cells instructions to make copies of the cv19 S protein. Once your cells display the S proteins on their surfaces, your immune system responds by creating antibodies.

In the case of AstraZeneca's cv19 vax, it uses a chimpanzee adenovirus to do the above.

The AZ jab still ends up messing around with your wife's natural (God-given, I might add) genetic material inside her cells in places that a natural exposure to a coronavirus would not.

The delivery mechanism is different vs. the mRNA jabs, but the end results are likely similar.

From what I have seen thus far, the number of shots seems to be more important as a predictor of potential adverse events, compared to the specific type of vax. Once you start going over 2 jabs, there is a significant increase in adverse effects.

The data isn't robust wrt to type of vax with the worse adverse side-effect profile, but besides # of shots, I suspect the order goes something like this: Moderna>Pfizer>AZ>JNJ>NovaVax; this particular ranking is completely speculative on my part, and subject to change, assuming more data is allowed to make its way to my feeds;

We've watched both videos and my wife is going to change her diet and take notes of changes she experiences, the whole histamine thing has opened up our understanding and she's already connected some dots with certain foods triggering symptoms.

Thanks a lot once again.

[Yodean]

I do hope he's okay, but have to say (in my most sensitive style) 4 or 5 shots means he put himself in for the Darwin Awards Sweepstakes.

I'm pretty sure YoungAnakin has had 5 shots. I mean, I guess I could look through his old posts to find out for sure, but can't be bothered right now.

The VaxInjured Plandemic is just beginning ...

[Yodean]

We've watched both videos and my wife is going to change her diet and take notes of changes she experiences, the whole histamine thing has opened up our understanding and she's already connected some dots with certain foods triggering symptoms.

Thanks a lot once again.

You are welcome. It's amazing what just a few dietary changes can do for a person's health. Also, as you mentioned previously, pollen season may also be contributing.

[outof thebox]

In that regard, I am concerned about TTH as he has gone silent. He reportedly took four shots. Has anyone been in contact with him recently? On a more positive note, perhaps he is just on holiday at a trendy and stylish resort.

Yep, I've been wondering about YoungAnakin as well. Last time he posted here, he was still in the "Window of Death" post-5th jab (I think he got five?).

Of course, he has a new ball and chain and is likely busy with dealing with the proceeds of his inheritance, as well as his money-lending and other businesses.

I do hope he's okay, but have to say (in my most sensitive style) 4 or 5 shots means he put himself in for the Darwin Awards Sweepstakes.

I fully agree with your take Budge, The guy is a very intelligent and he often talks about double-blind studies and the placebo effect, but the dismal truth is that none of these vaccines underwent thorough testing. So why did he disregard science and blindly follow Big Pharma? After all the dude is still relatively young and in good shape.
I remember when he took the first or second shot and still got COVID. At that point, I would have stopped if I were in his shoes. What more proof do you need. I am sure that injecting oneself with Tequila would have yielded better results. However, I still hope he is doing well.

[AstuteShift]

i know many people who took the boosters and all, however theyre fine and live normally without issues.
perhaps they gotten the placebo shots, who knows. I have not seen many in person who talked to me about side effects from the shots themselves, but rather how they couldnt get access to a doctor at the time to cater to their specific needs.

Remember, during that time, stress and anxiety was at a all time high and that can accelerate diseases at a alarming rate

I still wouldnt take the shot however, but always keep your cool when people panic.

[SOL]

Fake Scientific Abstracts Written By ChatGPT Fooled Scientists, Study Finds

Researchers at Northwestern University and the University of Chicago instructed ChatGPT to generate fake research abstracts based on 10 real ones published in medical journals, and fed the fakes through two detection programs that attempted to distinguish them from real reports.

They also provided the fake papers, as well as real ones, to reviewers, and asked them to distinguish between the two in a blinded study.

Those reviewers correctly identified ChatGPT-made abstracts 68% of the time, although they also incorrectly labeled 14% of real abstracts as fake ones.

Even though the fake papers were 100% unique when measured by a plagiarism detection program, only 8% followed formatting requirements required by scientific journals.

According to the reviewers, the fake papers were “vaguer and had a formulaic way of writing,” although it was “surprisingly difficult” to determine which ones were real and which weren’t, according to the study.

As a result, researchers urge journals and medical conferences that rely on scientific studies to maintain “rigorous scientific standards” and implement AI output detectors when reviewing papers.

“This is not someone reading an abstract in the wild,” Northwestern University researcher Catherine Gao said, adding, “the fact that our reviewers still missed the AI generated ones 32% of the time means these [generated]
abstracts are really good.”

Forbes Daily: Get our best stories, exclusive reporting and essential analysis of the day’s news in your inbox every weekday.


OpenAI’s ChatGPT, an AI-powered chatbox—a software designed to mimic human conversation—has been lauded as the most advanced chatbox ever seen and has raised eyebrows since it was released in November, writing poems, telling stories that are “eerily good,” generating Python computer code and writing college-level essays. The program, which is free to use, comes after companies like Microsoft and Meta experimented with their own chatboxes, although unlike ChatGPT, they failed to prevent racist and misogynistic rhetoric from spreading. Since its release, however, some critics have warned ChatGPT is too similar to human conversation, and could be used by students to cheat on schoolwork and by companies to replace certain roles with AI, including programmers and journalists. Last week, the New York City Public Schools system banned it over cheating concerns.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brianbusha ... 1bfc8718b6


It's going to get a lot harder to separate the truth from fiction.

[Budge]

"China scammer uses AI to impersonate victim’s friend, steal $823,000"

BEIJING – A scammer in China used artificial intelligence (AI) to pose as a businessman’s trusted friend and convince him to hand over millions of yuan, the authorities said.

The victim, whose surname is Guo, received a video call in April from a person who looked and sounded like a close friend.

But the caller was actually a con artist “using smart AI technology to change (his) face” and voice, according to an article published on Monday by a media portal associated with the government in the southern city of Fuzhou.

The scammer was “masquerading as (Guo’s) good friend and perpetrating fraud”, the article said.

Mr Guo was persuaded to transfer 4.3 million yuan (S$823,000) after the fraudster claimed that another friend needed the money to be withdrawn from a company bank account to pay the guarantee on a public tender.

The con artist asked for Mr Guo’s personal bank account number and then claimed that an equivalent sum had been wired to that account, sending him a screenshot of a fraudulent payment record.

Without checking that he had received the money, Mr Guo sent two payments from his company account totalling the amount requested.

https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east- ... eal-820000