I tend to agree with Lori on this. Making a separate "advanced" group will make those not invited feel kinda bad.LoriPrecisely wrote: ↑Tue Nov 15, 2022 11:50 pm I also understand the limit on your time. Maybe, someone else can answer certain topics of questions, as they occasionally do now.
This is a great group, and rather than separate the children into different classrooms, how about we keep the one-room schoolhouse affect so I can learn from y'all?![]()
Also, who is to judge who is "advanced" or not?
I say the following partially in jest: I'd rather be a "beginner" with a +1% return YTD than all the "advanced" traders here with, from what I can gather from public posts, private DMs, and private emails to me off-forum, 40% - 60%+ drawdowns this year.
As for the questions that come up with public presentation of "advanced" ideas, etc. ... if the TIT doesn't have time or interest in answering them, just don't answer them.
Let them hang out there ... others may eventually answer them, if they so wish.
No big deal if some questions aren't answered, imo.
Besides, there's the whole "beginner's zen mind" thing ... it's often good to have a mix of "beginners" and vets exchanging ideas ... sometimes the beginners remind the vets of something important, or help the latter look at some ideas in a new way.
Recent example: Lori mentioned something about the 4 stages of a stock's price action, etc., in the context of something from Weinstein's (?) book ... I had come across that idea/framework several years ago, and it has some merits, but I had kind of forgotten about it.
It triggered me to review that theory and now I am seeing the 4 stages (in different time frames) in a lot of stock charts. Helpful.
Also, you can just kind of form your own group on this forum by DMing specific subs. I know many of us have been doing that.
I as a general rule don't like official "groups" - really just a Herd, in a way - but it's often beneficial to exchange ideas with the "right" individuals, about certain topics.
For example, Harry, Nicolas and I have intermittently exchanged DMs, emails, etc. regarding COT data and how to apply them to the markets in combination with TA and MP, and so forth, but I wouldn't consider it an "advanced" group. It sort of evolved organically.
Just an exchange of ideas about a topic that the three of us find somewhat interesting to explore.
Other subs also randomly, but regularly, DM or email me with questions, etc. and I do my best to answer them.
So I don't think an official "advanced" TIT group is really necessary, but hey, that's not for me to decide.
'Sides, let's go with the Trend ... isn't it all about inclusion these days? LGBTQ etc.

Too much segregation into "levels," etc. "advanced or beginner" not necessarily that helpful.
Just show me a +ve CAGR!