Vaccine Efficacy Explained in 2 Minutes

Post Reply
User avatar
Yodean
Jeidi
Jeidi
Posts: 2685
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:02 pm

Terrain Theory

Post by Yodean »

Cinnamon wrote: Wed Nov 24, 2021 6:58 am Yodean what do you think about this theory that Viruses might not be real
@NewAgeNinja:

The world, at large, is not quite ready to adopt this perspective. Maybe in 50 to 100+ years, when this particular pendulum has swung the other way. I am pretty sure I won't be around in this current form at that time, lol, to see how this turns out ...

With that said, Dr. Thomas Cowan is certainly worth listening to. In the specific context of cv19, fwiw, I am in complete agreement.

I posted the following link in one of the T.I. forums many moons ago. Drs. Thomas Cowan and Andrew Kaufman opine about cv19 specifically. Probably somewhat of a mild challenge for the average layperson to listen to, as there is some use of jargon, but quite good, on balance.

https://theconsciousresistance.com/has- ... mas-cowan/

One critical topic which they mention is the concept of "Terrain Theory" vs. "Germ Theory." It's quite worth the time to slowly do a deep dive, over weeks to months, and read up a bit on "Terrain Theory." Really interesting, and worthwhile.

Another topic is "the Hygiene Hypothesis," which may be conceptualized as an extension of, or part of, "Terrain Theory." Lots of fairly decent, published scientific research supporting the Hygiene Hypothesis, for those who like to do their own research (generally a good idea).

With respect to other viruses like HIV, Hepatitis B (HBV) and Hepatitis C (HCV), I am not entirely certain. During the early years of my medical residency training (that's over 20 years ago), I participated in the direct care of many hospitalized AIDs patients, at a time when many of these young AIDs patients died as inpatients from all manner of horrifying complications.

I still remember some of them to this day. Pretty terrifying, at the time. Had a few nightmares, tbh.

I've also treated plenty of HBV and HCV patients (the liver is considered part of the Gastroenterology specialty) over the years, and seen all their specific complications, deaths, recoveries, etc. The HBV and HCV antivirals do seem to work, although perhaps not quite as well as the mainstream consensus would have you believe (the usual fudging with statistics, treatment outcome definitions, Big Pharma bribery, those sort of things, amplied x 666 for cv19, as an aside)

Somewhat hard for me, at the current juncture, to believe that Hepatitis B and C do not exist in some form. Of course, there may be an alternative conceptual framework, perhaps through the application of Terrain Theory in some way, to explain away all the HBV and HCV patients I have seen - this is certainly possible - but I have yet to come across this.

Regardless, good link you posted.
Buy Fear, Sell Euphoria. The Neonatal Calf undergoes an agonizing birthing, while the Bear falls into hibernation.
User avatar
Cinnamon
Junior
Junior
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2021 5:11 pm

Re: Vaccine Efficacy Explained in 2 Minutes

Post by Cinnamon »

Yodean and Astute. What do you make of this?

Someone sent this to me. I like to have some educated opinions from those in the medical field before deciding whether the info is valid or BS
“I have a Ph.D. in virology and immunology. I’m a clinical lab scientist and have tested 1500 “supposed” positive Covid 19 samples collected here in S. California. When my lab team and I did the testing through Koch’s postulates and observation under an SEM (scanning electron microscope), we found NO Covid in any of the 1500 samples. What we found was that all of the 1500 samples were mostly Influenza A and some were influenza B, but not a single case of Covid, and we did not use the B.S. PCR test. We then sent the remainder of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a few of the University of California labs and they found the same results as we did, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B. All of us then spoke to the CDC and asked for viable samples of COVID, which the CDC said they could not provide as they did not have any samples.

We have now come to the firm conclusion through all our research and lab work, that the COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious. The flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead were dead through co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, emphysema, etc. and they then got the flu which further weakened their immune system and they died. I have yet to find a single viable sample of Covid 19 to work with.

We at the 7 universities that did the lab tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC for Covid 19 fraud. the CDC has yet to send us a single viable, isolated, and purified sample of Covid 19. If they can’t or won’t send us a viable sample, I say there is no Covid 19, it is fictitious. The four research papers that do describe the genomic extracts of the Covid 19 virus never were successful in isolating and purifying the samples. All the four papers written on Covid 19 only describe small bits of RNA which were only 37 to 40 base pairs long which is NOT A VIRUS. A viral genome is typically 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs. With as bad as Covid is supposed to be all over the place, how come no one in any lab worldwide has ever isolated and purified this virus in its entirety? That’s because they’ve never really found the virus, all they’ve ever found were small pieces of RNA which were never identified as the virus anyway.

So what we’re dealing with is just another flu strain like every year, COVID 19 does not exist and is fictitious. I believe China and the globalists orchestrated this COVID hoax (the flu disguised as a novel virus) to bring in global tyranny and a worldwide police totalitarian surveillance state, and this plot included massive election fraud.”

12/10/20 Rob Oswald Ph.D
https://projectcamelotportal.com/2020/1 ... our-cells/
User avatar
AstuteShift
Black Belt
Black Belt
Posts: 1083
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2020 11:24 pm

Re: Vaccine Efficacy Explained in 2 Minutes

Post by AstuteShift »

Would not be surprised

Remember that one country president that found out the PCR test was positive for Covid on fruits and other objects? Well he is dead too I think

As more money is being printed, the more crazy fraud and deception will arise
Investor87
The Journey begins
The Journey begins
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 8:07 pm

Re: Vaccine Efficacy Explained in 2 Minutes

Post by Investor87 »

Cinnamon wrote: Sun Nov 28, 2021 2:41 pm Yodean and Astute. What do you make of this?

Someone sent this to me. I like to have some educated opinions from those in the medical field before deciding whether the info is valid or BS
“I have a Ph.D. in virology and immunology. I’m a clinical lab scientist and have tested 1500 “supposed” positive Covid 19 samples collected here in S. California. When my lab team and I did the testing through Koch’s postulates and observation under an SEM (scanning electron microscope), we found NO Covid in any of the 1500 samples. What we found was that all of the 1500 samples were mostly Influenza A and some were influenza B, but not a single case of Covid, and we did not use the B.S. PCR test. We then sent the remainder of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a few of the University of California labs and they found the same results as we did, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B. All of us then spoke to the CDC and asked for viable samples of COVID, which the CDC said they could not provide as they did not have any samples.

We have now come to the firm conclusion through all our research and lab work, that the COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious. The flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead were dead through co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, emphysema, etc. and they then got the flu which further weakened their immune system and they died. I have yet to find a single viable sample of Covid 19 to work with.

We at the 7 universities that did the lab tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC for Covid 19 fraud. the CDC has yet to send us a single viable, isolated, and purified sample of Covid 19. If they can’t or won’t send us a viable sample, I say there is no Covid 19, it is fictitious. The four research papers that do describe the genomic extracts of the Covid 19 virus never were successful in isolating and purifying the samples. All the four papers written on Covid 19 only describe small bits of RNA which were only 37 to 40 base pairs long which is NOT A VIRUS. A viral genome is typically 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs. With as bad as Covid is supposed to be all over the place, how come no one in any lab worldwide has ever isolated and purified this virus in its entirety? That’s because they’ve never really found the virus, all they’ve ever found were small pieces of RNA which were never identified as the virus anyway.

So what we’re dealing with is just another flu strain like every year, COVID 19 does not exist and is fictitious. I believe China and the globalists orchestrated this COVID hoax (the flu disguised as a novel virus) to bring in global tyranny and a worldwide police totalitarian surveillance state, and this plot included massive election fraud.”

12/10/20 Rob Oswald Ph.D
https://projectcamelotportal.com/2020/1 ... our-cells/
I did a quick search for him and it came up with a snopes article. They apparently reached out to him and the letter is not true. hmmm. I would research this further before I believed it.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/rob-o ... ovid-hoax/
User avatar
Yodean
Jeidi
Jeidi
Posts: 2685
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 9:02 pm

Re: Vaccine Efficacy Explained in 2 Minutes

Post by Yodean »

AstuteShift wrote: Sun Nov 28, 2021 4:24 pm Remember that one country president that found out the PCR test was positive for Covid on fruits and other objects? Well he is dead too I think
From a previous thread:

Yodean » Wed Mar 17, 2021 7:48 pm:

R.I.P. John Magufuli, Tanzanian President.

Another Truth-Teller dies mysteriously, from a "heart condition." This is one likely outcome when you don't follow the cv19 mainstream narrative and you are a public figure.

1-minute video:

https://youtu.be/s4p8DM8rKJI

:cry:

Magufuli had a PhD. In his case, the Permanent Head Damage manifested in thinking he could go against the DeepState. He didn't study "Plato's Allegory of the Cave" enough, it would appear.
Buy Fear, Sell Euphoria. The Neonatal Calf undergoes an agonizing birthing, while the Bear falls into hibernation.
User avatar
outof thebox
Junior
Junior
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2021 2:42 pm

Fact Checker can't be trusted?

Post by outof thebox »

Investor87 wrote: Sun Nov 28, 2021 5:00 pm
I did a quick search for him and it came up with a snopes article. They apparently reached out to him and the letter is not true. hmmm. I would research this further before I believed it.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/rob-o ... ovid-hoax/
What happens when you can trust the fact-checkers. here is some information that indicates that Fact check whatever might play to the main narrative





Proof that Snopes can’t be trusted to be truthful

Many know better than to trust Snopes to be an unbiased and trustworthy “fact-checker”, but, for those who don’t, here’s a perfect example of how they intentionally avoid and obscure facts in order to construct the conclusion they want to come to.

The claim that Fidel Castro could possibly be Justin Trudeau’s father has supposedly been thoroughly debunked, and is just the stuff of “wacko conspiracy theorists”.

In the Snopes article “debunking” that Trudeau’s mamma could have possibly made the beast with two backs with one of the 20th century’s most notorious communists (to result in the conception of one of the 21st century’s most notorious socialists), they go to great pains to show how Trudeau’s mother couldn’t possibly been anywhere other than Canada at the time. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/justi ... ove-child/


They dismiss the possibility that Trudeau’s mother took Castro’s all-star batter into the dugout by citing only official state visits between the two leaders. They also claim that the parent”s”-to-be had to be in Canada at the time of the conception because they had returned from their honeymoon on March 8th, and leave it at that.

To close their fact-check, Snopes established when Justin Trudeau would have been conceived:
It is extremely unlikely that Justin’s birth fell outside of that gestational range, meaning that Castro and Margaret Trudeau would have to have conceived their secret love-child between March 16th and April 22nd, 1971.
For some reason, though, Snopes failed to find and/or mention that the Trudeaus took a second honeymoon, shortly after their return from the first… to the Caribbean of all places.

Further, an article in the Ottawa Journal from 13 April, 1971, reporting from Barbados, says that the Trudeaus left by chartered plane, the day before, for an “undisclosed island” destination.
www.newspapers.com
Clipping from The Ottawa Journal - Newspapers.com
Clipping found in The Ottawa Journal in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada on Apr 13, 1971.
www.newspapers.com www.newspapers.com

So, despite labeling the theory that Margaret Trudeau could have possibly tried on a set of tandem-cowboy boots (you know, cowboy boots with with an extra set of cowboy boots on the toes) with Fidel Castro, a world leader that the known-promiscuous communist wife of the childless, 30-year senior cuckold PM of Canada “adored”, at the same time that the blackface-zygote-form of Justin was “in the pipe”, its possibility was readily provable with only minor research.

Now, I’m not saying that Fidel Castro is or isn’t Justin Trudeau’s father (but he is). I’m just pointing out how blatantly dishonest the “fact checkers” can be.
Image
Image
Image

https://www.homesteadingtoday.com/threa ... ul.617163/

I am not saying I believe the story but clearly, Snopes omitted some details, And Damn Trudeau looks more like Castro than his father, Just saying
If you don't fight today, someone will knock you out tomorrow
User avatar
outof thebox
Junior
Junior
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2021 2:42 pm

Re: Vaccine Efficacy Explained in 2 Minutes

Post by outof thebox »

Investor87 wrote: Sun Nov 28, 2021 5:00 pm

I did a quick search for him and it came up with a snopes article. They apparently reached out to him and the letter is not true. hmmm. I would research this further before I believed it.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/rob-o ... ovid-hoax/
And this one looks like a real Doozy. Snopes the fact check appears to be checking crap


Humiliated ‘fact-checking’ Snopes suspends co-founder busted for fake news, plagiarism


Friday was an extremely bad day for “fact-checkers” everywhere, as one of the media’s most beloved “fact-checkers,” Snopes, was itself publicly fact-checked.

It was fact-checked by BuzzFeed News, which published findings of an investigation showing that Snopes’ head honcho, co-founder David Mikkelson, is a “troll” who’s been blatantly lying to the site’s “millions of readers” about a variety of topics.

“Mikkelson … has long presented himself as the arbiter of truth online, a bulwark in the fight against rumors and fake news. But he has been lying to the site’s tens of millions of readers,” BuzzFeed News reported.

Though not mentioned by BuzzFeed, the site in general also has a track record for extreme left-wing bias — as, in fact, do virtually all mainstream “fact-checkers“:

“A BuzzFeed News investigation has found that between 2015 and 2019, Mikkelson wrote and published dozens of articles containing material plagiarized from news outlets such as the Guardian and the LA Times,” BuzzFeed continued.

The investigation, which was conducted quietly with help from other Snopes’ officials, found 54 articles from Mikkelson containing plagiarized material from outlets including but not limited to The Guardian and the Los Angeles Times.

These findings have led to Mikkelson being suspended from editorial duties pending “a comprehensive internal investigation” and his stories being tagged for removal, according to a joint statement from two other top Snopes officials.

“Our internal research so far has found a total of 54 stories Mikkelson published that used appropriated material. … Let us be clear: Plagiarism undermines our mission and values, full stop. It has no place in any context within this organization,” they said.

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2021/08/14 ... m-1118437/


This Is Why You Can’t Trust The Fact Checkers


For the last eight years I have worked as a writer, researcher, and investigative reporter for many well-known American independent media outlets. I have spent my time investigating digital surveillance technology, attacks on indigenous communities, and the overall growth of the government and corporate power. As someone working in this field, writing about topics which are often seen as controversial or “outside the mainstream” – censorship and personal attacks are part of the job description.

However, the attacks on independent media have rapidly increased in the last four years, with many formerly active journalistic outlets ceasing to exist due to lack of traffic and thus, lack of funds. We have seen outlets outright branded “fake news” or accused of collusion with the Russian government. Some channels and websites have been unable to apply for advertising or use certain digital products based on these labels. Some channels and reporters have been deleted off social media and other digital platforms altogether. And, if the social media managers don’t delete you, they might just use the algorithm to hide your posts, limiting your ability to interact with the public.

Attack of the “Fact” Checkers

Perhaps the most insidious method is the recent use of “fact checkers” to limit the reach of an outlet, or simply brand them with the fake news scarlet letter to discourage readers from engaging. This has been increasing in the last 2 years and I personally know of several remaining indy media outlets who have had to decide whether or not to run certain articles or video reports out of fear they might be censored or banned. Of course, with the algorithmic games being played by social media platforms, most outlets are reaching a tiny fraction of what they once were.

Case in point, The Mind Unleashed. I have been part of the TMU team on and off for the last year or so. In that time we have been struggling to reach a small fraction of our 9 million Facebook followers. Part of the reason we are struggling to reach people is because we have the dubious recognition of being labeled fake news by Facebook and affiliated fact checkers.

In a recent article published in Newsweek Espanol, in partnership with Newsguard, The Mind Unleashed is described as a “site that promises to ‘promote and inspire unconventional thinking,’ but is actually dedicated to publishing falsehoods.”. The quote was in reference to a story TMU had written about the origins of COVID-19 and the potential for the virus to have been created as a bio weapon.

Newsguard is one of a number of “fact checker” services which has proliferated since the election of Donald Trump to U.S. President. Newsguard is a browser plug-in for Chrome and Microsoft Edge that gives trustworthiness ratings to most of the internet’s top-trafficked sites. It uses a color coded system to warn readers of an article or website’s trustworthiness. In a previous investigation, TLAV writer Whitney Webb exposed the neoconservative roots of the Newsguard team. Webb wrote:

“Newsguard’s advisory board makes it clear that Newsguard was created to serve the interests of American oligarchy. Chief among Newsguard’s advisors are Tom Ridge, the first Secretary of Homeland Security under George W. Bush and Ret. General Michael Hayden, a former CIA director, a former NSA director and principal at the Chertoff Group, a security consultancy seeking to “advise corporate clients and governments, including foreign governments” on security matters that was co-founded by former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, who also currently serves as the board chairman of major weapons manufacturer BAE systems.”

https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com ... -checkers/
If you don't fight today, someone will knock you out tomorrow
User avatar
Eric
Advanced
Advanced
Posts: 455
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2020 3:58 am

Re: Vaccine Efficacy Explained in 2 Minutes

Post by Eric »

stefk wrote: Tue Nov 23, 2021 10:22 am
stefk wrote: Wed Nov 17, 2021 4:35 pm I am sure that in the near future, the non vaccinated will have gold in their balls, and intuitively, women will feel it.
https://sodomsun.com/21000-price-increase-on-unvaccinated-sperm/ wrote: “It’s the new white gold. Forget about BitCoin; the real money is in unvaccinated sperm,” shared Sam Yankwell of a local sperm bank, GoodSeed 4U.

“Nobody’s interested in post-jab material; all they care about is pre-Covid and certified unvaccinated samples. Our phones are ringing off the hook!”
......

Mates, we really have gold in our balls. Its normal, we have more in the balls and more in the head. The probability to make good progeniture is higher. Yodean, Astute and all the others, forget bitcoin, focus on your balls.......
That "article" you quoted was a joke and a good one at that. This however is not a joke, it is a peer-reviewed and accepted medical study published by Andrology journal which is a joint effort of the American and European Andrology associations.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epd ... andr.13209
Covid-19 vaccination BNT162b2 temporarily impairs semen concentration and total motile count among semen donors.

Focus on your balls indeed.
-FOMOing in is how the masses loose their asses.
-"forget bitcoin, focus on your balls......." -Stefk
-Misinformation: noun, information that is true and correct and might lead people towards freedom and autonomy instead of tyranny and slavery.
User avatar
SOL
Power VS Force
Power VS Force
Posts: 3267
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2020 7:32 am

Re: Vaccine Efficacy Explained in 2 Minutes

Post by SOL »

Eric wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 12:56 am
stefk wrote: Tue Nov 23, 2021 10:22 am
stefk wrote: Wed Nov 17, 2021 4:35 pm I am sure that in the near future, the non vaccinated will have gold in their balls, and intuitively, women will feel it.
https://sodomsun.com/21000-price-increase-on-unvaccinated-sperm/ wrote: “It’s the new white gold. Forget about BitCoin; the real money is in unvaccinated sperm,” shared Sam Yankwell of a local sperm bank, GoodSeed 4U.

“Nobody’s interested in post-jab material; all they care about is pre-Covid and certified unvaccinated samples. Our phones are ringing off the hook!”
......

Mates, we really have gold in our balls. Its normal, we have more in the balls and more in the head. The probability to make good progeniture is higher. Yodean, Astute and all the others, forget bitcoin, focus on your balls.......
That "article" you quoted was a joke and a good one at that. This however is not a joke, it is a peer-reviewed and accepted medical study published by Andrology journal which is a joint effort of the American and European Andrology associations.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epd ... andr.13209
Covid-19 vaccination BNT162b2 temporarily impairs semen concentration and total motile count among semen donors.

Focus on your balls indeed.
Wokism probably has even more detrimental effects, the sperm does not know where the start or finish line is, it might swim the wrong way
When the words short term appear under any post; the same conditions listed in the Market update under the short term category apply

The end is always near; its the beginning and how you live each moment that counts the most
User avatar
Budge
Black Belt
Black Belt
Posts: 1099
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2020 7:13 am

Re: Vaccine Efficacy Explained in 2 Minutes

Post by Budge »

Recently, Steve Kirsch went on Tucker Carlson's show (guest host Brian Kilmeade) and, as usual, all the normal actors had a fit of outrage about his estimates of deaths caused by the mRNA vax. In this very long substack piece Dr Naomi Wolf supports Kirsch's estimates using different source materials.

At the end of the piece, Dr Wolf arrives at a concerning conclusion. She feels the mRNA is in fact a bioweapon:

"And on balance, more importantly, this is a massacre; the stealthiest massacre in American history; a novel kind of massacre; in which hundreds of thousands can be injured, or can even be killed, on a battlefield of which they are unaware; with bullets which they cannot even see; in a war about which they are told — that no evidence exists."

https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/americ ... dium=email
..whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government..
User avatar
outof thebox
Junior
Junior
Posts: 234
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2021 2:42 pm

Re: Vaccine Efficacy Explained in 2 Minutes

Post by outof thebox »

Budge wrote: Tue Aug 16, 2022 1:15 pm Recently, Steve Kirsch went on Tucker Carlson's show (guest host Brian Kilmeade) and, as usual, all the normal actors had a fit of outrage about his estimates of deaths caused by the mRNA vax. In this very long substack piece Dr Naomi Wolf supports Kirsch's estimates using different source materials.

At the end of the piece, Dr Wolf arrives at a concerning conclusion. She feels the mRNA is in fact a bioweapon:

"And on balance, more importantly, this is a massacre; the stealthiest massacre in American history; a novel kind of massacre; in which hundreds of thousands can be injured, or can even be killed, on a battlefield of which they are unaware; with bullets which they cannot even see; in a war about which they are told — that no evidence exists."

https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/americ ... dium=email
It's assholes galore time. Or blood suckers galore, but in the end it comes down to critical thought and having a backup plan in case you slip up, in this case taking the jab because you wanted to move around or just not be trapped. A friend of mine is focusing on keeping inflammation down, so far he has had no issues.
If you don't fight today, someone will knock you out tomorrow
Post Reply