Insights into the COVID Pandemic

[AstuteShift]

I’m glad this nonsense is over

Monkey pox is a laughable attempt but no staying power and no one cares

[Triplethought]

"Will physicians EVER speak out?
Or will they continue to shrug their shoulders and refuse to look at the data showing that these vaccines are the biggest scandal in medical history?



https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/will ... urce=email

As you already know, Budge, the ones who speak out are either ignored (if they don't have a strong public following) or demonized as a "crazy doctor," "crazy anti-vaxxer," or a "nutty conspiracy theorist."

Generally, they are effectively cancelled. The whole Plato's Allegory of the Cave playing out in real time ...

I'm surprised you know about those MDs who died at the Mississauga hospitals and North York General Hospital - Mississauga and North York are parts of Greater Toronto - my wife just mentioned that story to me yesterday, actually.

From my understanding all four mentioned in the story were quite young (50s, from what I remember) and in good health.

More to come, unfortunately ...

2 of those doctors had cancer. Their death wasn't sudden, unexpected or related to Covid. Neither was the 3rd doctor (undisclosed previous illness) So there's that.

[Triplethought]

"Will physicians EVER speak out?
Or will they continue to shrug their shoulders and refuse to look at the data showing that these vaccines are the biggest scandal in medical history?

As you already know, Budge, the ones who speak out are either ignored (if they don't have a strong public following) or demonized as a "crazy doctor," "crazy anti-vaxxer," or a "nutty conspiracy theorist."

Generally, they are effectively cancelled. The whole Plato's Allegory of the Cave playing out in real time ...

I'm surprised you know about those MDs who died at the Mississauga hospitals and North York General Hospital - Mississauga and North York are parts of Greater Toronto - my wife just mentioned that story to me yesterday, actually.

From my understanding all four mentioned in the story were quite young (50s, from what I remember) and in good health.

More to come, unfortunately ...

2 of those doctors had cancer. Their death wasn't sudden, unexpected or related to Covid. Neither was the 3rd doctor (he had undisclosed previous illness).
The term "marathon" comes from a soldier who ran 26 miles to report the results of a war and then dropped dead as he gave the news. Triathlon is an extension of that bad idea. So the female doc is not the first person to drop dead while swimming or running to excess.

[LoriPrecisely]

As you already know, Budge, the ones who speak out are either ignored (if they don't have a strong public following) or demonized as a "crazy doctor," "crazy anti-vaxxer," or a "nutty conspiracy theorist."

Generally, they are effectively cancelled. The whole Plato's Allegory of the Cave playing out in real time ...

I'm surprised you know about those MDs who died at the Mississauga hospitals and North York General Hospital - Mississauga and North York are parts of Greater Toronto - my wife just mentioned that story to me yesterday, actually.

From my understanding all four mentioned in the story were quite young (50s, from what I remember) and in good health.

More to come, unfortunately ...

2 of those doctors had cancer. Their death wasn't sudden, unexpected or related to Covid. Neither was the 3rd doctor (he had undisclosed previous illness).
The term "marathon" comes from a soldier who ran 26 miles to report the results of a war and then dropped dead as he gave the news. Triathlon is an extension of that bad idea. So the female doc is not the first person to drop dead while swimming or running to excess.

People with immune compromised health were definitely more susceptible to the harmful effects of the mrna serum that was being injected into people.

[Budge]

"Will physicians EVER speak out?
Or will they continue to shrug their shoulders and refuse to look at the data showing that these vaccines are the biggest scandal in medical history?



https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/will ... urce=email

As you already know, Budge, the ones who speak out are either ignored (if they don't have a strong public following) or demonized as a "crazy doctor," "crazy anti-vaxxer," or a "nutty conspiracy theorist."

Generally, they are effectively cancelled. The whole Plato's Allegory of the Cave playing out in real time ...

I'm surprised you know about those MDs who died at the Mississauga hospitals and North York General Hospital - Mississauga and North York are parts of Greater Toronto - my wife just mentioned that story to me yesterday, actually.

From my understanding all four mentioned in the story were quite young (50s, from what I remember) and in good health.

More to come, unfortunately ...

2 of those doctors had cancer. Their death wasn't sudden, unexpected or related to Covid. Neither was the 3rd doctor (undisclosed previous illness) So there's that.

Thanks for your diligence. Perhaps you could do a check on these cases please:

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/vsrf ... urce=email

or this:

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/wayn ... urce=email

Just asking for a friend

[Yodean]

https://twitter.com/i/status/1555719005784010752

*****

On a more personal note, had to spend some time recently helping my quasi-uncle-in-law who lives in Toronto.

Short version: 67m average health previously, recently diagnosed with stage 4b lung cancer, not too long after getting booster jab. Stage 4b means metastatic spread to a bunch of places, basically. So he's likely got 4 - 8 months left, prolly less.

His oncology team was busy pushing him - like, right away, barely after diagnosis - to enroll in an experimental trial using immunotherapy, yet they wouldn't give him a straight answer to many of his questions, including how long he had left. I was going to stay out of this, but he asked my spouse to ask me for my honest opinion.

Well, the truth is that I never liked the guy, who is a bit of an idiot, although quite a funny one.

I didn't quite have the heart to tell him that the cv19 jabs likely contributed to the sudden appearance of his advanced lung cancer out of nowhere (through deleterious effects on immune surveillance of pre-cancerous cells), but I didn't really hold back in the other areas.

Here is the email I wrote him:

*****

July 22/22

PET CT:

-the tumour is very large & has spread to many areas, including several different regions in the chest, lymph nodes, liver, bone, and muscles near the right back and right hip; spread to brain is small (too small for CT to see, but seen on MRI presumably - MRI report not available to me at time of writing);

-the largest (likely original source) tumour is near the center of the right lung and has caused obstruction (and consequently collapse) of a portion of the right lung – this, along with the associated “cystic/necrotic changes” mentioned (just means the tumour there is quite advanced in its growth, with the core of it starting to show decay) are poor prognostic factors;

-of particular concern is that the tumour is starting to invade the surrounding blood vessels, another unfavourable prognostic element;

-this is considered stage 4b by the most commonly accepted staging system – it is the most advanced stage;

-the overall 5-year survival rate for stage 4 non-small cell lung cancer is approximately 4% (percentage of patients alive five years after diagnosis);

-the median survival time (time at which 50% of patients are alive & 50% have died) is about four months; this includes both stage 4a (slightly less advanced vs. stage 4b) & stage 4b – so the latter’s survival rate is likely lower, and median survival time less;

-data up to 2017 shows that the 5-year survival rate for stage 4b is < 1% (see attached graph);

-a variety of factors, including treatment type, contribute to the survival rate of stage 4 NSCLC (non-small cell lung cancer - the category your tumour type falls under); while a third of patients has a short prognosis (less than three months), 10% to 15% of patients who survive more than three months can live with the disease for two or more years;

-on balance, although there has been a flicker of promise shown by some of the newer immunotherapy drugs as well as the newer chemotherapeutic cocktails, for stage 4b in particular, it is unclear whether these newer treatments would lead to any meaningful improvements in survival rate/time, based on best data available to me;

*****

Advantages of enrolling in proposed research study:

-as you probably already know by now, if you enroll in the study, you will receive lots of attention by the research staff; lots of phone calls, emails, etc. inquiring about your symptoms, well-being, & so forth;

-at least initially, you will avoid the side effects of chemotherapy (but you will still likely get the ones associated with the immunotherapy);

*****

Disadvantages of enrolling in proposed research study:

-the research staff will likely want you to make extra visits to PMH, & you will end up spending a lot more time in hospitals;

-you will likely get poked a lot more than necessary (bloodwork), potentially require more biopsies, invasive procedures, surveys, stool/urine collection at home, etc., which can prove increasingly onerous as the clock runs down;

-even if you choose to withdraw from the research study at some point, you will still likely be asked to do more bloodwork, surveys, etc., which will likely prove quite annoying;

*****

Synthesis:

It comes down to how much you want to fight the tumour. As you already know, you will ultimately lose, but you may be able to buy your family & yourself some extra time. Besides all the medical stuff, there is still a lot science does not know about why some people manage to survive when most others do not, over a specific time period.

For now, what is perhaps most critical is to think about all the reasons you have for living - i.e. to spend more time with your family, etc. It is going to get hard - really hard - very fast, and at those moments, you will need to continually remind yourself why you want to go on living. Best to have those reasons clear in your mind/heart before the tough moments arrive.

Treatment for stage 4b is really about increasing the quality of life (decreasing symptoms) of the time left, with some potential for a little extra survival time.

It is often called “palliative chemo” for a reason. The potential costs include side effects of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, more time spent in hospitals, getting poked for bloodwork, etc., instead of spending the remaining time doing fun stuff and tidying up loose ends.

Some patients with stage 4b opt for a pure palliative approach (i.e. no chemotherapy or immunotherapy, only medications/treatments for symptoms as they arise) from the outset - these are usually patients who are very old, have pre-existing medical conditions, and basically do not have a lot to live for.

Most others who are still relatively active and functional choose conventional therapy (both chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic cocktails – i.e. not to enroll in the proposed study) and depending on side effects and response to treatment, will choose to discontinue the therapies (or reduce to a single chemotherapy drug) over time. I suspect this approach may make the most sense for you at this time.


Hope this helps,

Dean

*****

Keep an eye out for a lot of "sudden" cancers being diagnosed in your friends and family ... the TrendForce behind this Slaughter is strong, and growing stronger ... the perishing has started ...

[Budge]

Scary video.

Re: your email - nicely done. Some folks want to bury their heads in the sand, others just want the facts so they can prepare. Have you had a response from him or relatives?

My son is an ER doc and his fiancée is in her first year of residency with PICU as her first rotation. Lost a patient couple of days ago and she knows two of the kids she'll see tomorrow will likely not make it. That's brutal.

[bpcw]

Pretty sobering post Yodean.

Have you come across any link between strokes and the vaccines? Both my younger brother (50) and older sister (59) have had mini strokes in the last couple of months. High blood pressure runs in the family and both had very high readings at the time of the stroke but could the vaccines add to a propensity for it?

[Yodean]

Have you had a response from him or relatives?

My son is an ER doc and his fiancée is in her first year of residency with PICU as her first rotation. Lost a patient couple of days ago and she knows two of the kids she'll see tomorrow will likely not make it. That's brutal.

The uncle-in-law was grateful for the straightforward response after an initial negative reaction. His wife actually developed some post-booster adverse reactions as well: hives, chronic sinusitis x months, and a new anaphylactic reaction to Biaxin (to which she never had previous problems prior to vax) that landed her in the ER for several hours. Her face is still puffed up.

To be fair to them, they were suspicious of the jabs from the start, but took them because they wanted to travel. Played Russian roulette, and did not win.

Yeh, about your son's fiancee - never fun to lose a patient, especially a young one. Puts everything in perspective. Ms. Death spares no one.

[Yodean]

Pretty sobering post Yodean.

Have you come across any link between strokes and the vaccines? Both my younger brother (50) and older sister (59) have had mini strokes in the last couple of months. High blood pressure runs in the family and both had very high readings at the time of the stroke but could the vaccines add to a propensity for it?

Yes, definitely a strong link between cv19 vaccines and blood clotting, which can increase one's propensity for strokes (clotting of cerebral/brain blood vessels) and heart attacks (clotting of coronary/heart blood vessels).

High blood pressure is also certainly a risk factor for strokes and heart attacks, to be fair, but at the time of a stroke or heart attack, blood pressure is usually elevated anyways, because of the stress (sympathetic nervous system overdrive) induced by the stroke or heart attack.

The following is long, but quite good, and sums up the last 2.5 years quite well; also has some info wrt your questions on this topic:

https://rumble.com/v1e719x-uninformed-c ... movie.html

[stefk]

Thank you Dean, for all these priceless infos.

[SOL]

General Info for High BP

Yodean has an edge here, so in general, I would differ to him; he is one of the few conventional doctors that mixes both natural and allopathic medicine, so it's a good combo.

I have some experience (only experience) as I started to suffer from high BP many moons ago, my mother had it, and several others I also know. The common theme appeared to be wheat, lack of magnesium, too much meat (the processed kind, not the grass-fed kind), and lack of exercise (I was the only exception, and most doctors thought my BP was normal; it was roughly 138/80, but it used to be 120 to 125 by 70/75). They also seemed to be lacking in Salt, the pure kind of Sodium Chloride (no Iodine added). Everyone that changed their lifestyle met with success. In all instances, blood pressure normalized.

Other things that were done
More veggies were added to the diet, and moderate exercise, for example, walking for 45min to 60 minutes and watching comedy movies or skits. Laughter tends to help.



On a separate note, A Ukrainian guy I know has unbelievably high BP. I think it's something like 180 to 190 by 130 on good days. They refused to operate on him because of his BP. Long story short, they said he would have to get his BP to normal levels. They had a program in that hospital. His family signed up for it; the only reason being the guy is as stubborn as a mule and won't listen to anyone. In essence, for seven days, he was fed only boiled food. His BP dropped in 7 days to 150/90 and a few days later to 150/85, which was excellent compared to his old readings. This study has to fall under the category of anecdotal data, but still, it is quite interesting as he was 70 years old at the time

[bpcw]

Thanks Sol and Yodean, personally my blood pressure isn't too bad at around 140/90 but both my brother and sister's were very high when they went into hospital, my brothers was around 205/110.

Was particularly interested in any link to covid vaccines.

Interesting that a lack of salt being common, the mainstream narrative is of course the opposite!

[Yodean]

Thank you Dean, for all these priceless infos.

You're welcome Stefk. Thank you also for the training tips/asanas and antioxidant spices/substances postings - I have found them quite interesting and helpful.

Health before wealth, love before law.

[Triplethought]

I didn't quite have the heart to tell him that the cv19 jabs likely contributed to the sudden appearance of his advanced lung cancer out of nowhere (through deleterious effects on immune surveillance of pre-cancerous cells), but I didn't really hold back in the other areas.


Dean[/i]

*****

Keep an eye out for a lot of "sudden" cancers being diagnosed in your friends and family ... the TrendForce behind this Slaughter is strong, and growing stronger ... the perishing has started ...

Yodean, I can't quite square this attitude with your medical knowledge. No where have I found valid scientific literature that links Covid jabs to sudden onset cancer. The truth is a cancer is going to show up in older populations eventually and MOST older people will have gotten jabs. Correlation is not causation. You may personally suspect a correlation but correlation isn't causation. It's like buying a black pickup and then suddenly noticing how many black pickups are on the road.

In fact most cancer patients are urged to get a Covid vaccine due to the fact they will have weakened immune systems