|
Random Musings 1
December 27, 2004
A relationship, I think, is like a shark, you know? It has to
constantly move forward or it dies. And I think what we got
on our hands is a dead shark.
~
Woody Allen
1935-, American Director, Screenwriter, Actor, Comedian
We are going to end of the Year with something new, it’s a
series that we have decided to title “random Musings” and it
will be a collection of thoughts, observations and patterns
and their relation or impact on our daily lives. Off course
whenever possible we will attempt to tie them in to the
financial markets.
Affinity For Negativity
We will examine this topic very briefly because it does play
an important role in investing. Individuals as a rule seem
far more inclined to listen to and act on negative
information rather than on positive info. Don’t believe me;
allow me to illustrate this point to you.
We have 4 glasses of water on the table. Someone states that
the water in one of the glasses came from a Jug that had a
dead fly in it. Now mind you, you don’t even know this
person, yet immediately almost everyone would walk away from
those glasses, even if they were dying of thirst. Almost no
one would try to verify if this information was indeed true.
Now someone comes to you and states, hey one of those
glasses contains water from the purest spring in the Swiss
Alps. I am almost sure that no one would rush to drink all 4
glasses in an attempt to secure the purest water.
Take it a step further. We have gloom doom arguments on how
the financial world is going to end and immediately our ears
perk up. Yet let someone come up with an argument stating
that everything is fine and we don’t want to listen or at
most we will only listen with one ear.
How about market crashes. Gurus coming out stating that the
market is going to crash and burn and the masses panic and
start buying puts and dumping their quality shares. Yet if
someone comes and states that the market is going to rise,
they don’t pay attention to the person. (Off course it can
work the other way too, depending on the current sentiment
and perception of the crowds.)
This is what we experienced when we publicly stated that we
expected the Dow to rise to over 10,500 last year, when it
was still under 9k. No one wanted to hear anything new and
so after our article debuted on Financial Sense and Gold
Eagle we were flooded with emails stating that we had lost
our minds. I remember that I was in a humorous mood at that
time so I answered some of the emails with the following
line:
It takes one to know one.
Life was, is and never will be fair. Life is what you make
of it. So don’t fret about things you cannot control;
instead look for ways to take advantage of these situations.
You have only one option; instead of trying to be a Good
Samaritan and finding an early grave, just simply find out
what the long-term trend is and follow it.
With or without manipulation there is always a trend, and if
you stay with the trend you have nothing to worry about.
Random musings on Experts.
Everybody loves to use the word 'expert' all the time to
claim they know something extra or have knowledge of the
inner workings in a specific field or area. Now if you want
to turn the tables around on them all you have to say is the
following: However, first repeat the word expert slowly and
then spell it like it sounds and viola you get EX SPURT,
which basically means that this expert is nothing but a
spurt that never was, in other words, they are finished even
before they have even begun. Isn’t it strange that most so
called financial experts fall into the EX SPURT category?
We use words to secretly define what we know to be true but
refuse to believe or see with our open eyes. To live in an
illusion is far easier than to step out and deal with
reality. It’s said that reality bites, but then we could say
illusions swallow. In reality, there is no such thing as an
expert, because who are you measuring yourself. Anyone can
be expert if they measure themselves against the ignorant
and blind. There are only advanced market students or
advanced life students. We can never stop learning for when
we do, senility is very close at hand.
The secret programmed desire to lose Syndrome Part 1
So far, we have looked at the laws of paradoxes, then we
expanded on these laws, and now we will slowly start to look
at the 'secret programmed desire to lose Syndrome.'
From the day we are born, we are inundated with information,
most of it is nothing but a mismatch of cultural values,
religious values and what is perceived to be the norm during
that time period. For the most part, 80% or more of this
information is truly biased and untested in terms of science
and logic. What we mean is that we are told to believe
things based on “well that’s what our family did for
generations and that’s how things have always been.”
As time goes by, we are told how we should behave, how we
should eat, what we should eat, who our friends should be,
what type of career to aim for, what is socially acceptable
and what is not, around what age we should look to settle
down and what type of woman or man would we should choose to
settle down with. We are also taught that working for the
group or community at large is the right thing to do and
that being selfish is very bad.
We are taught that we should dedicate our lives to one
person and actually promise that we will do this, even
though we have a very hard time just keeping our new year's
resolutions. We are not told that instead of saying I
promise, we should instead say I will try my very best, but
being weak and human it is possible that I might fail along
the line. This promise in most cases is guaranteed to
achieve the exact opposite result and if one looks at the
statistics, the evidence is overwhelmingly in favour of
this. It’s this fear of trying to live up to an ideal that
most of us know that we cannot live up to that actually ends
up in causing the relationship to end. The most successful
relationships are those ones in which a whole different
approach has been taken; the key to their success is that in
general the individuals involved are happy with themselves
and are not looking to find happiness in another but simply
enhance it.
Today we will just dip into these topics and explore each
one in more detail along the line. Just remember we are not
telling you what to do, or that we are right, or that we
know it all. All we are doing is sharing our opinion, and we
are willing to admit in advance that we could be wrong and
if proven to be wrong we will readily admit to our
wrongdoings. Life is not about trying to prove you are the
best, but simply a quest for new information and looking at
old information with a new set of eyes.
Let's start of by looking at the working for the benefit
group headmaster and how being selfish is supposed to be
bad.
One big flaw with this principle is that how could you
possibly know what’s good for the group if you have no idea
of what’s good for you. So blindly you try to work for the
benefit of the group, and since we have millions of
misguided individuals working under a misguided premise,
it’s a mega recipe for disaster. That is why we have so many
depressed people, lost people, people who feel like they
have no purpose in life, etc.
This somehow blends with the paradox principle, in order to
succeed the law of paradoxes states that you must be ready
and willing to embrace your failures. So taking this one
step further, in order to share you must be willing to
understand and embrace the principle of selfishness. In
order to work for the group you must be ready and willing to
work for the benefit of yourself and the list goes on.
So what we should be taught is that first we should look out
for our self-interests and when we are okay we should take
that knowledge and share it with others. That being selfish
in moderation is not only good but also a vital necessity to
our survival. For if one does not care about one’s health or
wealth, how could they care about the health or wealth of
the group? We suggest you read the book called “The Virtue
of Selfishness” by Ann Rand.
Our final musing will be on the following topic:
The necessity of losing and why it makes sense and cents
Imagine for a second that you got up and from this day hence
forward you just kept winning every time you played the
markets. Sooner than later winning would become boring,
because you would not have anything to compare your wins to.
The reason a win feels so good is because you compare it to
a point in time when you lost something. Not only do you
bask in the new felt emotion (because you remember the pain
of losing), but you also feel incredibly great because of
the financial windfall from that win. What we are trying to
state here is that losing or failing is an important and
integral part of winning and success and that without the
other life would be drab and dry.
However, what happens over time is that most individuals
seem to think that they can do nothing but fail or lose. The
way to stop this evil process is to immediately understand
the purpose of losing and failing. When you lose or fail it
means you have done something wrong, you are being given a
second chance to evaluate where you might have strayed or
erred. Most of us instead just keep doing the same thing
that made us experience our first loss, and we hope that
sooner or later we will hit the mother load by luck. If we
examine the reason we lost or failed, we see exactly what it
was that caused us to fall off the tracks, and, even if we
don’t succeed on the next attempt, we will at least make
sure that we never ever repeat the same mistake again.
Through constant analysis of our mistakes, we can finally
develop a system or systems that can with patience and
persistence help us win in the markets and more importantly
help us with the most important battle in our lives: the
quest to find happiness, which is really nothing other than
the quest to find inner peace. Remember this too, nothing
good ever comes easy; if it did it was not worth it in the
first place.
Imagination was given man to compensate for what he is not,
and a sense of humor to console him for what he is.
~ Francis Bacon 1561-1626, British Philosopher,
Essayist, Statesman

|