Interim Update Oct 18, 2022

[jonnyfrank]

Dear SOL,

We are not looking for PROPHETS. We simply seek PROFITS.

Sincerely,

All of us

[DOCLUC]

Dear SOL,

We are not looking for PROPHETS. We simply seek PROFITS.

Sincerely,

All of us

[SOL]

Dear SOL,

We are not looking for PROPHETS. We simply seek PROFITS.

Sincerely,

All of us

How can I argue with that? lol.

[SOL]

Focus on the long-term...and avoid the short-term.

The Hurrier I go, the Behinder I get!

LOL.

Add the short term and the long term together then divide by 2 and call it medium term.

Brilliant and we multiply by two we can get the super long term trend lol.

Btw I sent you instructions on how to post images using imgbb, did the email get through? I will post it again in a separate thread also

[SOL]

Lastly, there are no prophets, anyone claiming to be a prophet is a fool and anyone following a prophet is an even bigger fool.

SOL! What do I do NOW!

Well, Bpcw might recommend two our father's and 10 hail mary's and then the act of contrition.

[scott]

Well, Bpcw might recommend two our father's and 10 hail mary's and then the act of contrition.

Got it!

[harryg]

SOL! What do I do NOW!

Well, Bpcw might recommend two our father's and 10 hail mary's and then the act of contrition.

Here is the first Hail Mary



Here is the second Hail Mary

[bpcw]

Lastly, there are no prophets, anyone claiming to be a prophet is a fool and anyone following a prophet is an even bigger fool.

SOL! What do I do NOW!

Well, Bpcw might recommend two our father's and 10 hail mary's and then the act of contrition.

No I definitely wouldn't cause I'm not a religious Catholic, we have to talk to God from the heart as if we believe he's actually listening!

Here's how to pray:
https://youtu.be/GiqaLnDoTx8

Now that's a prayer!

[MarkD]

Might be an important price level to watch. AVWAP from August swing high.

https://imgur.com/v97ePtO

[Centeron631]

Having been othewise engaged a week ago Tuesday and most of the week i did not get to read this IU until the weekend.

Maybe it is intended to work in simplicity but i find the explanations as clear as wax paper, taking away from simplicity. Some of it again imo poor grammar and the lack of proof reading to see if there is room for other interpretations and lack of checking the parts in context of the whole, as i have expressed in the past. I do not expect this to improve much in future.

small sampling of confusions eg. We will now in the futureexplicitly warn(by.....) investors that fall within the low-medium risk category as follows :
that the Market is trading in the 70% overbought range- increase cash position to 25% of holdings
that theMarket is trading in the 85% overbought range- Increase cash holdings to 50%.

The long-term outlook calls for a stock market correction (as was the case last year)- Increase cash holdings by up to 75% (not certain if talking in present re long term outlook correction or the correction is to the upside or downside ) or Ti uses correction to always mean to the downside)(also not sure if this thought is completely separate from the previous statement or not)

The thing is these r my guestements of what is trying to be conveyed and that imo should not be happening and as i say this is only a small sampling of several and personally causing me headache. After repeating the reading still left in a swirl-imo an example of form destroying what could be very good substance. I will get ready for the bang- back even tho i spent 40 years reading Laws and case laws where expression had to be razor precise.

Please note that we cannot determine everyone's risk profile so these rules will serve as a guideline for all traders u

[Cinnamon]

Having been othewise engaged a week ago Tuesday and most of the week i did not get to read this IU until the weekend.

Maybe it is intended to work in simplicity but i find the explanations as clear as wax paper, taking away from simplicity. Some of it again imo poor grammar and the lack of proof reading to see if there is room for other interpretations and lack of checking the parts in context of the whole, as i have expressed in the past. I do not expect this to improve much in future.

small sampling of confusions eg. We will now in the futureexplicitly warn(by.....) investors that fall within the low-medium risk category as follows :
that the Market is trading in the 70% overbought range- increase cash position to 25% of holdings
that theMarket is trading in the 85% overbought range- Increase cash holdings to 50%.

The long-term outlook calls for a stock market correction (as was the case last year)- Increase cash holdings by up to 75% (not certain if talking in present re long term outlook correction or the correction is to the upside or downside ) or Ti uses correction to always mean to the downside)(also not sure if this thought is completely separate from the previous statement or not)

The thing is these r my guestements of what is trying to be conveyed and that imo should not be happening and as i say this is only a small sampling of several and personally causing me headache. After repeating the reading still left in a swirl-imo an example of form destroying what could be very good substance. I will get ready for the bang- back even tho i spent 40 years reading Laws and case laws where expression had to be razor precise.

Please note that we cannot determine everyone's risk profile so these rules will serve as a guideline for all traders u

You missed the most important part

We will warn everyone when each stage is hit.

SOL and Team will tell us when each stage is reached, removing the need to guess.

[Triplethought]

Having been othewise engaged a week ago Tuesday and most of the week i did not get to read this IU until the weekend.

Maybe it is intended to work in simplicity but i find the explanations as clear as wax paper, taking away from simplicity. Some of it again imo poor grammar and the lack of proof reading to see if there is room for other interpretations and lack of checking the parts in context of the whole, as i have expressed in the past. I do not expect this to improve much in future.

small sampling of confusions eg. We will now in the futureexplicitly warn(by.....) investors that fall within the low-medium risk category as follows :
that the Market is trading in the 70% overbought range- increase cash position to 25% of holdings
that theMarket is trading in the 85% overbought range- Increase cash holdings to 50%.

The long-term outlook calls for a stock market correction (as was the case last year)- Increase cash holdings by up to 75% (not certain if talking in present re long term outlook correction or the correction is to the upside or downside ) or Ti uses correction to always mean to the downside)(also not sure if this thought is completely separate from the previous statement or not)

The thing is these r my guestements of what is trying to be conveyed and that imo should not be happening and as i say this is only a small sampling of several and personally causing me headache. After repeating the reading still left in a swirl-imo an example of form destroying what could be very good substance. I will get ready for the bang- back even tho i spent 40 years reading Laws and case laws where expression had to be razor precise.

Please note that we cannot determine everyone's risk profile so these rules will serve as a guideline for all traders u

Nostradamus also spoke in long winded and sometimes confusing or self-conflicting prose. As does the bible. If you throw enough vague text on the page there are bound to be some sentences you can point to later that were correct. Or that you can re-interpret as correct.

[Yodean]

I will get ready for the bang- back even tho i spent 40 years reading Laws and case laws where expression had to be razor precise.

That's the problem with having a legal background. Don't read TIT stuff literally - try to ascertain the main narratives behind all the grammatical and syntactical misadventures.

Translation of TIT: BTFD, STFR a bit (sell the friggin' rip) ... in good stocks, of course. STW (spin the wheel) like a ballet dancer.

Really, pretty much all you need to know atm.

Adjust position sizes and cash allocation based on individual preference - forget about trying to determine your own risk tolerance - this changes for most retail investors day-to-day, and most aren't totally honest with themselves - i.e. most investors have tremendous upside risk tolerance, but little downside risk acceptance.

Individual preference carries less emotional weight.

One can also DCA (dollar cost average) into the BTFD, and DCA out of the STFR.

nfa.

[LoriPrecisely]

Wow, are you guys watching the market today?
Great money making opportunities!!

[Centeron631]

Wow, are you guys watching the market today?
Great money making opportunities!!

And how r U puting money in ur Pocket today Ms Precisely?