Insights into the COVID Pandemic

[Yodean]

My daughter works in a hospital in San Diego.
I talked to her today - their ICU completely full with Covid patients, same as last spring.
Their stats: 80% un-vaccinated / 20 % vaccinated.

There is a possibility that you may want to read Eric's 2nd post on page 27 of this thread. As well as watch some of the video clips on this thread.

Just puttin' it out there.

[adr]

I don't believe much in elaborate conspiracy theories, life is more simple.
besides, if the goal of the evil few was to reduce the population, wouldn't it be more logical instead of sterilizing young and healthy to let covid lose and let it wipe out weak and old?

[Yodean]

Here is the video of that talk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUjkSaedN4g

Impressive 7-minute segment starting @ around the 15-minute mark of the clip.

[Yodean]

besides, if the goal of the evil few was to reduce the population, wouldn't it be more logical instead of sterilizing young and healthy to let covid lose and let it wipe out weak and old?

You are conflating two separate issues. Personally, I don't at this point believe that the vaccines in their current form are part of a specific, depopulation agenda.

But are they potentially dangerous? Yeh.

Are they truly necessary? Nah.

Is cv19 more dangerous than the common cold or flu? Highly unlikely. They've done their best to obfuscate the data, but at worst, its case fatality rate lies in the neighborhood of 0.1% to 0.3%, and I've pretty much read all the half-decent studies that are out.

Long covid, you say? Well, if you study the cold and flu epidemics of the past, there is always a certain percentage (around 10%, just like long covid) of patients who have persistent, mild symptoms for months to years after - it just wasn't deemed important enough to give it a name like "Long Covid."

Is the PCR test reliable? Nah, it's garbage. They also use different thresholds for the vaxxed vs. the unvaxxed.

Call up your local lab and ask about how they test for the "delta" variant - there is no specific, reliable test for variants, to my best and most current knowledge - the CDC/WHO "say" they can tell the differences between cv19 variants, and from my understanding they tell the local labs to report a certain percentage as the "delta" variants. And so forth.

It's very easy to dismiss anything that the mainstream media doesn't want you to believe as "conspiracy theories."

[SOL]

I don't believe much in elaborate conspiracy theories, life is more simple.
besides, if the goal of the evil few was to reduce the population, wouldn't it be more logical instead of sterilizing young and healthy to let covid lose and let it wipe out weak and old?

We also don't believe in elaborate conspiracy theories. There are many levels to this but one of the main points is that it's all about silencing dissenting voices and we are not referring to dissenting voices in regards to COVID. We are talking about dissent in general. COVID will go away and another situation will crop up and after each incidence what happens is a little more freedom is lost.

We spoke of how freedoms that were once taken for granted would come under attack. So, from the eagle's vantage point, the issue is all about control.

[Eric]

This doctor providing input to a school board in Indiana is a personal friend of my lifelong friend (60 years strong) and the two of them have played hockey together, saved a few of us old guys during cardiac arrest together (my personal friend's testimony). That being said, my buddy has turned a corner, finally, after viewing his physician friend's testimony:

My question is how & where do I find an internist or family practice doctor that is willing to think critically and treat patients with honesty and integrity rather than just tow-the-line for the anti-science crowd that is in charge of nearly every hospital group, state board, and federal government agency? Not like I can afford to make 100 office visits just to interview doctors (since my doctor just decided he doesn't want to do clinic work anymore and is moving to a hospital 35 miles away).

[Eric]

Well, my wife came home tonight and had two pieces of news for me...<snip>...In the hospital lab where she works half the people are a year or less from retirement or quitting for career advancement (i.e. they're nearing the end of their schooling for different positions); the other half that would stick around are almost all refusing the jab.

My wife works in a satellite lab 95% of the time, recently she was able to catch up with someone that works in the main lab and found out there is literally one single worker-bee between both labs that has taken the jab and is not planning on quitting for other reasons already.

Minnesota is giving $100 visa gift cards as incentive... Like that's going to sway people that have resisted until now.
I'm a whore too...but not for a Benjamin; my price is $300,000 tax-free (or $300k after tax, I don't care).

[SOL]

This doctor providing input to a school board in Indiana is a personal friend of my lifelong friend (60 years strong) and the two of them have played hockey together, saved a few of us old guys during cardiac arrest together (my personal friend's testimony). That being said, my buddy has turned a corner, finally, after viewing his physician friend's testimony:

My question is how & where do I find an internist or family practice doctor that is willing to think critically and treat patients with honesty and integrity rather than just tow-the-line for the anti-science crowd that is in charge of nearly every hospital group, state board, and federal government agency? Not like I can afford to make 100 office visits just to interview doctors (since my doctor just decided he doesn't want to do clinic work anymore and is moving to a hospital 35 miles away).

Nowadays unless you know the doctor well, they are not going to go against the system for fear of getting sued or worse. Overseas doctors and by that I mean outside the West are the way to go. For example Eastern Europe, Asia, South America etc. They generally tell you like it is. You need to go to places where in essence medical insurance is an option.

Now a second option might be this
https://mediglobus.com/consultation-of- ... gn-doctor/

[Yodean]

... are talking about dissent in general. COVID will go away and another situation will crop up and after each incidence what happens is a little more freedom is lost.

We spoke of how freedoms that were once taken for granted would come under attack. So, from the eagle's vantage point, the issue is all about control.

I'm guessing zee next "big thang" is zee man-made climate change mantra . . . the Greta Karens will make it near impossible for me to enjoy my grass-fed steaks, and I will simply have to pay an extra carbon tax on it . . . on top of the extra cv19 handling fees.

Some sort of serious cyberattack leading to more regulation on internet usage is also probable.

Still, my ultimate aim, unlikely to be realized and hopefully not to be tested in this particular lifetime, but an ambitious aim nonetheless, is to reach a point, through various somewhat dubious training regimens, where I can be at peace in a jail, eating only pesticide-enriched veggies. That's like, level 5.5 or sumpthin', eh.

[Investor87]

I found https://myfreedoctor.com/ to be helpful. A pulmonary specialist doctor sent in a prescription for me for ivermectin as a preventative to covid. I just took my third dose this morning. I'll reconnect with them for further instructions if I get covid. They also prescribed; D, C, Zinc and Quercetin.

[adr]

It's very easy to dismiss anything that the mainstream media doesn't want you to believe as "conspiracy theories."

Yes, we hear what we want to hear and see what we want to see - equally applies to MSM and alternative sources.
Therefore - don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see.

Is covid danger overblown ?- yes
Do people die from covid ? - yes
Do vaccines help ? - possibly
Do vaccines more dangerous that the disease? - unlikely
When my friend's mom died from covid, I said - she was 83, that's why
when my relative died at 43, I said he was overweight, that's why
but when my gardener, a healthy man 40smthg, died after 10 days in ICU, I got myself a Moderna shot

[Cinnamon]

So I was sent a long document with these facts from someone that is generally a good researcher but no links were provided. I know many of you are quite well versed with the COVID situation so I am going to post some of these statements below and ask for your opinion on them. Are they true, partially true or just complete B.S.

Not a single government agency in the world has been able to provide – through Freedom of Information requests – any confirming data proving that the “novel” (new) coronavirus of 2019 was ever scientifically isolated and identified. If they cannot, that suggests that it’s actually just the same old cold & flu of years past. In fact, a court case against a Covid “non-complier” was actually thrown out because the province of Alberta was not able to produce such records!


*

There is no evidence to show that masks can prevent the spread of viruses. The micro "bugs" are generally not airborne, and can easily penetrate through the fibers of your bacteria-infested, oxygen-limiting mask as a mosquito would through a chain-link fence.

* According to the CDC, the average age of a so-called “Covid victim” is almost 80. According to the same CDC, the average life expectancy in the United States is ---- also about 80! So, what’s the frickin’ fuss all about?!

* Again, according to the CDC, 94% of those who died had at least one other life-threatening condition, and 70% had TWO other life-threatening conditions (in addition to their old age).

* According to CDC statistics, a person in his or her 50s, without any other pre-existing life-threatening conditions, is about as likely to choke to death during a meal than of dying from “Covid.” (which isn’t even real). So then, why are you not pureeing all of your food?

* Hospitals and nursing homes were paid $10,000 for each diagnosis of “Covid” and an additional $39,000 for each patient then placed on a dangerous ventilator. Sheer greed (by design of the master planners) drove our “health care heroes” to list deaths by pneumonia, flu, COPD, asthma attacks, strokes, diabetes, heart attacks etc as “Covid.” Murder victims were even tagged as “Covid!” And a few brave doctors have come forward and admitted that administrators are “pressuring” them to list “Covid” on death certificates.

* The PCR “test” which is used to “diagnose” the imaginary illness was never intended to be used as a diagnostic tool. The inventor of the process – 1994 Nobel Prize winner Kary Mullis – said so himself!

Dr Mullis: “

With PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody. If you amplify one single molecule up to something you can really measure, which PCR can do – then there are very few molecules that you don’t have at least one of them in your body. So that can be a misuse of it, to claim that it is meaningful.”

In this video, DR Mullis clearly is calling Fauci an idiot and a liar

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTWN_PJ8t2o

Mysteriously Dr. Mullis Died just before the COVID pandemic



Another very cool video that illustrates the genius Dr Kary Mullis was

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSVy1b-RyVM

[SOL]

@ Cinnamon Thanks for this information. Dr Mullis is definitely someone to pay attention to. And digging further I found this info, which adds more light to the current controversy surrounding the PCR test

In another video clip, Mullis noted how PCR tests can be amplified so much as to make them unreliable for diagnostic testing: “With PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.”

“Because if you can amplify one single molecule up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there’s just very few molecules that you don’t have at least one single one of them in your body. So that could be thought of as a misuse of it, just to claim that it’s meaningful.”

“It allows you to take a very minuscule amount of anything and make it measurable and then talk about it …like it is important … see that’s just a misinterpretation,” Mullis stated.

He described PCR testing as “a process that’s used to make a whole lot of something out of something. That’s what it is. It doesn’t tell you that you’re sick and it doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you or anything like that.”

With Mullis no longer alive to repeat his arguments, the PCR test has been promoted by individuals such as Fauci, with health agencies and politicians seemingly blind to the growing evidence of false positives resulting from PCR tests.

However, Mullis has been vindicated by a group of 22 international scientists, called the International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS), who have identified “ten fatal problems” with the Corman-Drosten (CD) paper which was used back in January 2020 to promote PCR tests as the diagnostic tool for COVID-19. Each of the flaws is enough to render the test “useless as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus,” and the group points to the “worldwide misdiagnosis of infections,” which have resulted from PCR tests for COVID-19.

As Mullis noted himself, the ICSLS observed that PCR tests are unable to distinguish between “the whole virus and viral fragments,” meaning that a so-called positive test, as mentioned in the CD paper, cannot determine if one is infected with the virus, but “merely indicates the presence of viral RNA molecules.”

Once again, as Mullis had mentioned, the group said that PCR tests can be amplified to a level which renders the results “completely unreliable,” and echoed Mullis’s very words — “amplified PCR products can be anything.”

An article in The New York Times last year admitted that PCR tests can amplify a small amount of the virus to such an extend as to make it meaningless.

“In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus,” The New York Times found by reviewing the data.

Instead of using 37 to 40 cycles, which is common practice right now, the article suggested anything under 30 to 35 cycles to indicate a positive.

“Tests with thresholds so high may detect not just live virus but also genetic fragments, leftovers from infection that pose no particular risk – akin to finding a hair in a room long after a person has left,” one doctor argued, according to the article.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/inven ... oure-sick/

It definitely makes sense to petition against the adoption of the COVID passport and there is a space if you click the above link to do so if you feel that it's not something that should be done

and it gives weight to what Benjamin Franklin said

"Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

[Budge]

At least there are some out there searching for answers. Interesting convergence of AI tool and covid research.

"Why do some people get sick and die from COVID-19 while others seem to be completely unaffected?

EPFL’s Blue Brain Project deployed its powerful brain simulation technology and expertise in cellular and molecular biology to try and answer this question. A group in the Blue Brain assembled an AI tool that could read hundreds of thousands of scientific papers, extract the knowledge and assemble the answer - A machine-generated view of the role of Blood Glucose Levels in the severity of COVID-19 was published today by Frontiers in Public Health."

https://www.technologynetworks.com/neur ... -19-351789

[Yodean]

Good posts, guys/girls/its.

With that said, I can pretty much guess with a high degree of certainty that ULTRAMARTIAN knew all of this over 15 months ago.

Sol P. likely as well, but he's got a business to run and probably doesn't want to piss off too many subs.