Insights into the COVID Pandemic

[Yodean]

Maybe it even becomes mainstream that lockdowns, social distancing, and mask mandates were all ineffective.
Are you guys seeing any other change in the narrative?

Unfortunately, my sense is that it will be close to the complete opposite: the mainstream narrative going forward will be that the vaccines worked - that lockdowns, physical distancing, and masks helped a bit, but it was mostly the vaccines. This will be a dominant narrative for quite a while, and will justify future "booster shots," and perhaps more sophisticated vaccine experiments on the human population in real time for years to come.

Those who dutifully followed the mask mandates, physical distancing, lockdown impositions, and got all 2+ of their vaccine jabs will congratulate themselves on "beating the invisible enemy," and henceforth may condescendingly look down on the minority that did not, and say that herd immunity was achieved through vaccines.

The masses will believe they saved themselves - as well as the cv19 "conspiracy theorists" - through their abject obedience to government regulations.

[SOL]

Maybe it even becomes mainstream that lockdowns, social distancing, and mask mandates were all ineffective.
Are you guys seeing any other change in the narrative?

Unfortunately, my sense is that it will be close to the complete opposite: the mainstream narrative going forward will be that the vaccines worked - that lockdowns, physical distancing, and masks helped a bit, but it was mostly the vaccines. This will be a dominant narrative for quite a while, and will justify future "booster shots," and perhaps more sophisticated vaccine experiments on the human population in real time for years to come.

Those who dutifully followed the mask mandates, physical distancing, lockdown impositions, and got all 2+ of their vaccine jabs will congratulate themselves on "beating the invisible enemy," and henceforth may condescendingly look down on the minority that did not, and say that herd immunity was achieved through vaccines.

The masses will believe they saved themselves - as well as the cv19 "conspiracy theorists" - through their abject obedience to government regulations.

And all this confirms Pluto's allegory of the cave, try to awaken the walking dead and risk getting shot. It's not called critical thinking for no reason. It takes effort to sort and sift through the crap and form your opinion but most want everything to be served on a platter, but they never bother to look at the platter. If they did, they would find that the food is rotten and full of worms but hey that is a story for another day.

Examining the situation from an MP perspective indicates that the noise behind the Vaccine was and is designed to give the masses a false narrative to focus on. How do you steal from someone without them knowing, polarise a situation and then steal from them in broad daylight because they are focussing on the wrong issue. A lot crap is already occurring right in front of the masses for example central bankers are destroying currencies and no one is saying anything, etc, etc, Look around no one is focusing on anything that matters anymore, the fixation is on COVID.

[bpcw]

We had practically nothing but Brext for over 3 years, the fears going around that the UK would fall off a cliff edge was incredible, then Covid came along and it was like Brexit never was, a new narrative of fear. The same people, swallowing it hook, line and sinker again.

I also think the vaccine will be held up as a wonder scientific breakthrough and the term 'following the science ' which I've heard so much over hear will be lodged in the minds of the masses, ready for the next manipulation narrative of global warming and if we don't do our bit, keep our carbon footprint low, we will all burn up like toast put on too high! The masses see scientists as those who only seek the truth with no agenda or philosophical positions and that they have tried and tested methods, they are badly deceived but the scientific community maintain one of the last bastions of trust from the masses and the elites will use this.

I think!

[Budge]

"The masses see scientists as those who only seek the truth with no agenda or philosophical positions and that they have tried and tested methods.."

..and could never be bought and paid for

[ultramartian]

I find it interesting that an opinion previously called a “conspiracy theory” is now “possible.” What was “debunked” is now supported by “new facts and trends”.

As a 20-years veteran of conspiracy theories, I am witnessing so many of the theories unfolding and realizing before my eyes in real time since early 2020. What a time to be alive in the era of the "New World Order" which they have been promoting and planning for many decades, maybe centuries.

In China, you could be held legal liability if you spread rumour on the social media platforms. But many times those rumours were proven to be truths like in the case of Dr. Wenliang Li who first warned about a deadly SARS-like pneumonia disease emerging in Wuhan but was detained and interrogated by the police. He had to retract and apologize for spreading "rumours". He later contracted the "virus" and died within a month or so. After his death the pandemic was already rampaging the whole China. So there is a saying in China:
謠言 = 遙遙領先 的 預言
Rumour = advanced prediction

[SOL]

I find it interesting that an opinion previously called a “conspiracy theory” is now “possible.” What was “debunked” is now supported by “new facts and trends”.

As a 20-years veteran of conspiracy theories, I am witnessing so many of the theories unfolding and realizing before my eyes in real time since early 2020. What a time to be alive in the era of the "New World Order" which they have been promoting and planning for many decades, maybe centuries.

In China, you could be held legal liability if you spread rumour on the social media platforms. But many times those rumours were proven to be truths like in the case of Dr. Wenliang Li who first warned about a deadly SARS-like pneumonia disease emerging in Wuhan but was detained and interrogated by the police. He had to retract and apologize for spreading "rumours". He later contracted the "virus" and died within a month or so. After his death the pandemic was already rampaging the whole China. So there is a saying in China:
謠言 = 遙遙領先 的 預言
Rumour = advanced prediction

Again I present Pluto's Allegory of the cave as it actively explains what is going on today. The masses are not interested in digging and so the top players give them what they seek dirt on their faces. Think of what happened in the years gone by. If you stated something that did not fit the narrative you might not have been attacked as you would be today but the net result was the same, you would be called someone that is crazy or promoting conspiracy theories. The net effect is that the percentage that doesn't want to see the light is the same. The only difference today is because of Social media and the speed the news travels at, one has the chance to see the effects 10X faster.

What we have today is the weaponization of news, where Gossip and hearsay are accepted as the Absolute Truth because concubines AKA EXPERTS stand behind the claims they are paid to promote. Today someone with a following of 1 million is an expert even if in real life he is on par with a donkey when it comes to processing and interpreting data.

[Yodean]

[Budge]

The Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC Alliance) issued a public statement earlier this month laying out the case for the prophylactic use of Ivermectin and how and why there is such widespread opposition.

"..ivermectin use reduces the risk of contracting COVID-19 by over 90% and mortality by
68% to 91%."

"The WHO Ivermectin Panel arbitrarily included only a narrow selection of the available
medical studies that their research team had been instructed to collect when formulating
their recommendation, with virtually no explanation why they excluded such a
voluminous amount of supportive medical evidence."

"As expert clinician-researchers in society, we are firmly committed to ensuring that public
health policy decisions derive from scientific data. Disturbingly, after extensive analysis
of the recent WHO ivermectin guideline recommendation, we could not arrive at a
credible scientific rationale to explain the numerous irregular, arbitrary, and inconsistent
behaviors documented above. Further, after consultation with numerous physicians,
guideline reviewers, legal experts, and veteran PHA scientists, we identified two major
socio-political-economic forces that serve as the main barrier influences preventing
ivermectin’s incorporation into public health policy in major parts of the world. They are:
1) the modern structure and function of what we will describe as “Big Science” and;
2) the presence of an active “Political-Economic Disinformation Campaign.”"

https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-cont ... 1.2021.pdf

[MarkD]

https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/fi ... r-BB1gpPwa

[SOL]

https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/fi ... r-BB1gpPwa

In other words, the main ingredients are ones we already know work but they have to be repackaged before the FDA will say yes, so they can charge 4 to 10X more

Active ingredients of the medicine are aprotinin, hydroxychloroquine, and ivermectin, which are known as effective drugs for the treatment and prevention of COVID-19. Vaananen's company said it used these ingredients in a targeted manner on the mucous membrane of the upper respiratory tract

.

[MarkD]

A close friend is a pharmacist with extensive FDA knowledge and experience. His wife works for Pfizer. When I first mentioned the fact other remedies could work he was "not surprised". The second time, "...the RNA vaccinces are fine, but the gubmint is screwing pharma co by allowing IP to be given away.". The third time, "...it's going to take that Finnish company years to get approval through the FDA."

My thoughts, it's all been a bunch of b.s.

[Yodean]

There's a three-minute clip by a YT-deplatformed freedom-obsessed Canadian chick that I found quite amusing, at the following link:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/inte ... -for-life/

[ultramartian]

There's a three-minute clip by a YT-deplatformed freedom-obsessed Canadian chick that I found quite amusing, at the following link:

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/inte ... -for-life/

Even though Canada is on average much more "progressive" and "liberal" than the US (and most of the world), I found it amazing that some of my favourite "influencers" (for lack of a better word) who advocate freedom and truth are Canadians such as Jeff Berwick (Dollar Vigilante, I disagree with his view on crypto, but you can't blame him when he bought Bitcoin at $3), Amazing Polly, Jeff Censored! (suddenly deceased about 5 months ago, his YT channel still exists), Dan Dick (Pressed for Truth), Henry Makow (savethemales.ca), The Corbett Report, Benjamin Fulford (fantasized conspiracy theories), and this sweet lady ( I think her YT channel used to be Not a Pretty Face or something).

[AstuteShift]

It’s interesting how now so called conspiracy theories are being bought up in the media, Fauci leaked emails etc

The question is, are both governments, building up the possibility of a Luke warm war ( USA vs China)

In order for central bankers to keep continuing the fraud and crime, they would need a big excuse since covid hysteria is slowly dying down. A war would definitely kill two birds with one stone, a panic in the markets and more printing of money

A war also would make COVID disappear. Uncle Sam loves a fight and tensions toward China are slowly building

[stefk]

It’s interesting how now so called conspiracy theories are being bought up in the media, Fauci leaked emails etc

The question is, are both governments, building up the possibility of a Luke warm war ( USA vs China)

In order for central bankers to keep continuing the fraud and crime, they would need a big excuse since covid hysteria is slowly dying down. A war would definitely kill two birds with one stone, a panic in the markets and more printing of money

A war also would make COVID disappear. Uncle Sam loves a fight and tensions toward China are slowly building

yes, why not, dont forget that war is in the DNA of the democratic party.