Housing Debacle; Boom & Bust Cycle

Study the past, if you would divine the future. – Confucius. Chinese, Philosopher Quotes


 If you look at any chart from 2003-2006, you will see what we stated months before the market topping came to pass.  The housing market soared to unimaginable heights that it had to be destroyed before bottom took hold. And, sadly, this is exactly what happened. Did the masses learn from history  The answer would have to be a loud resounding no?  Is this not what took place during the  dot.com mania 1996-2000.  The main reason we had a housing bubble was that any individual with a pulse could go and buy a house without a downpayment.

Housing bubble of 2006-2009

Notice the steep uptrend line; everyone was jumping in like there was no tomorrow. Everywhere you went the average person was telling you it was time to buy and this was the way to retire rich.  And then it all ended. The cure for low prices is low prices and the cure for high prices is high prices.   The Green square represents the bottoming action.  The Housing Index has finally broken past it’s primary Downtrend line. So it should trend upwards for a few more years.

Now back to what lead to this bubble 

Most of these individuals were buying houses instead of renting so when they walk away from their homes they are only risking their credit but essentially nothing else.  You then have the next category who thought they could make a fortune by buying 2-3 or even more houses; again, for the most part, they were able to buy these houses with little or no money down or to use the leverage of the previous house purchased as collateral for the next house. A lot of individuals in the housing valuation sector were being pushed by banks to over evaluate houses. Now in the aftermath, this situation which borders on fraud is being investigated when it should have been studied and brought under control before the housing market went out of control. In the end, it comes to the same old story greed seems to blind even the savviest of investors; bankers are known for being cautious but during the housing mania it appeared that they threw caution to the wind and just focused on today’s bottom line instead of looking out into the near future.

For the most part, the majority of the individuals who purchased homes with little to nothing down did not lose that much money.   Look at it this way they would still have to pay rent and so the monthly mortgage payments could be viewed as monthly rental payments; in most cases, one could argue that if a small down payment was made most of it was recovered when these individuals ceased to pay their mortgages; yes, it is a different way to look at the situation. However, it’s valid and it takes two to tango and one to cry. So these gullible people are equally to blame as are the unscrupulous bankers.

These individuals are not losing that much money; what they are giving up is the profit they could have once locked in had they sold their houses at the right time.  Yes, ones, credit rating is important and valuable, but stupidity extracts a high price and those that did not think or let greed rule will now need to have long intimate talks with the grim reaper.  To an outsider it might look as if we are taking a light view on the situation but we assure you we are not.  We know of individuals who did not even ask the mortgage brokers what their rates would be once the deceiving low adjustable rates came to an end. There were numerous stories of individuals bidding up prices in the tens of thousands, just because they thought they could more than make up this money in 1-2 years. At one point Apartments in Vegas with a view to the strip were commanding premiums of 50k plus; imagine this insanity paying 50k more just to be able to look down at a stupid overlit strip.  These individuals did not take the time to evaluate what they were getting into or what they stood to lose if the housing market crumbled; they had only one thought in mind, and that was to make as much money as they could make.

For illustrative purposes, we are going to provide very simple examples of how in most cases individuals did not lose much except to sacrifice and in most cases destroy their credit ratings.

Couple 1

Let’s say the rent for their home was 1800 dollars a month and they buy a home in 2005 with a very low adjustable mortgage of 2%; based on this their monthly payments come in at say 1478 a month. At one point they were even offering rates of between 0%-1percent for the first 2-3 years of the mortgage.   They jump because it now looks like they could own a home for less than what they were paying for in rent; stupid reasoning for you never own the home till it’s paid off in full.  Also, the Adjustable rate was not taken into consideration; euphoria has a way of blinding everyone.  When the low adjustable rates ended mortgage payments in many cases doubled.  Let’s assume that their credit was average; at one point even individuals who had bankruptcies on their records could get a mortgage.  So the house value falls, payments double; the math is simple they walk away. What have they lost? Other than their average credit nothing much.  Once again we are not saying a person’s credit rating is not important but we are looking at the situation from what one lost financially and not from the emotional stress and trauma that comes about from destroying one’s credit.

2nd scenario

Good credit and so-called smart individuals

Purchased several homes and rented them out to use the rent to pay the mortgage but kept on doing this until the end instead of bailing out when they were sitting on lovely gains. Some smart, astute individuals did bail out, but the majority held thinking that the party would never end. Look at some of the big housing names such BZH, LEN, etc. many of them bought huge tracts of land for insanely inflated prices, and some even bought large patches in the desert.

The picture is the same. Prices have fallen, rates have doubled, and they can’t make their payments. So what do they lose? A huge amount of potential profit and their very good credit status, but regarding real money lost they have not lost that much.

There are other variations of this, but the picture is the same; in the end, it’s the institutions that gave these mortgage and the ones that repurchased them that have lost the most.

Bottom line the biggest losers were and still are the banks who issued these mortgages and the institutions that purchased these repackaged instruments.  What the majority of the small investors lost was the possibility of owning a home and their credit rating as they had over-leveraged themselves to the hilt. Now some would point to the tent cities cropping up for example in California as an illustration of the pain many of these individuals are feelings. Let’s examine this a bit more deeply.  In many cases, these individuals were forced out of their homes and into the street because they lost their job, which means that even if they were renting, they would have been thrown out of their homes for not being able to pay the rent.   Indirectly their jobs were affected by the downturn in the industry, but this would have happened regardless of whether they bought a house or not. If you lose your job, no one is going to let you live rent free unless they have lost their minds.  Had they instead of taking this risk decided to live one or two standards below their over inflated lifestyles and put this money into a savings account they would have had something to fall back on a rainy day.

What is causing their real pain? Well, the slowdown in the economy and the huge number of layoffs. Thus the pain caused is not directly related to the purchase of their homes but to the fact that many of them were indirectly employed by the housing sector.  The real pain is once again being caused by over-exuberance; everyone over invested in one sector (housing sector) and as prices rose they started to live like the rich and the famous. The pain that is being caused now is no different from the pain that was caused during the internet mania; in the end, some great bargains will be found as was the case in the aftermath of the dot-com era.

While it may look tempting to purchase housing stocks right now we would wait a bit longer for its far better to play safe then jump in too early as one could be flying from the frying pan and straight into a smoldering fire; markets have a tendency to overshoot these days and just as the housing sector overshot to the upside it will most likely do the same on the downside. As an example let’s take a look at LEN

From roughly Jan of 2000 LEN started to take off; the housing sector was in the first stages of a huge upward move while the financial markets were embarking on the first leg of a massive correction.  LEN soared from roughly 7 dollars in Jan 2000 to a high of 68 dollars on July 05; it has since given up most of those gains and like the internet bust we feel that it together with DHI, PHM, etc. are all probably going to at the very least test their pre-breakout prices. In Lennar’s case, this would equate to a price of roughly 7 dollars.

Today’s article stating that a record 4 million (9% of total homeowners) homeowners were either behind on their payments or in foreclosure does not exactly bode well for this industry Full Story. It indicates that the worst is still not over or more importantly the market has probably not yet priced all the potentially negative news that still could emerge from this sector.  Let’s not forget that not all Adjustable rate mortgages have reset yet; Census data indicates that roughly 2 million mortgages will reset from May 2008 to Sept 2008, almost double that of 2007.

New legislation which was passed to help owners will only help a small percentage of the total as the guidelines are rather strict.  Most individuals are living from pay cheque to pay cheque but let’s assume that they happen to have 1-3 months of reserve payments and for argument’s sake let’s choose three months.  Foreclosure times vary considerably from state to state so let’s assume that an average period would be seven months.   Thus roughly in July of 2009, a whole wave of new foreclosures will hit the markets and given the fact that it is taking roughly 11 months to sell a home now we are left with this sobering thought, who would have the guts to go out and buy in the midst of all this chaos?  We think very few would be brave to venture out during such trying times.  The real estate sector needs to go through a stage where the amount of bad news coming out starts to slow down and the number of foreclosures starts to drop before the brave would risk venturing out to buy; this means that at the very least the real estate market won’t put in a bottom until early 2010

Conclusion

It’s for this reason we have stated that we have to reach the stage of helplessness before this market puts in a bottom. Look back at those that purchased shares in internet companies and if you paid attention you would have noticed that when CMGI dropped from 166 to 4 dollars and Yahoo from over 124 to 20 dollars, etc. these people just lost it; they gave up and just buried their heads in the sand hoping against hope that some miraculous force would come and rescue them from their plight; their wait proved to be fruitless.   For the record CMGI traded as low 1 dollar and Yahoo as low as 4 dollars before putting in a bottom.  Something like this will hit the housing sector before it starts to put in a long-term sustainable bottom.  As an example looks at PCLN; even though its drop was just as steep (over 90% at one point); it managed to rally from a low of 6 to a recent high of roughly 126 dollars. It is still nowhere close to its old high but who cares if you bought anywhere from 6-20 dollars you are sitting on massive gains; the same will hold true for the housing sector.

Men nearly always follow the tracks made by others and proceed in their affairs by imitation, even though they cannot entirely keep to the tracks of others or emulate the prowess of their models. So a prudent man should always follow in the footsteps of great men and imitate those who have been outstanding. If his prowess fails to compare with theirs, at least it has an air of greatness about it. He should behave like those archers who, if they are skilful when the target seems too distant, know the capabilities of their bow and aim a good deal higher than their objective, not in order to shoot so high but so that by aiming high they can reach the target. – Niccolo Machiavelli 1469-1527, Italian Author, Statesman

Additional suggestions

If you seek freedom, the 1st task is to attain financial freedom so that you can break free the clutches of the top players who strive to enslave you. They want you to run in a circle like a hamster that runs on a spinning wheel; the hamster thinks the faster it runs the further it will go, but sadly it is going nowhere.

We teach how to use Mass psychology to your advantage, how to view disasters as opportunities and how not to let the media manipulate you and direct you towards actions that could be detrimental to your overall well-being.  Visit the investing for dummies section of our website; it contains a plethora of free resources and covers the most important aspects of mass psychology.

Secondly, subscribe to our free newsletter to keep abreast of the latest developments. Change begins now and not tomorrow, for tomorrow never comes. Understand that nothing will change if you don’t alter your perspective and change your mindset. If you cling to the mass mentality, the top players will continue to fleece you; the choice is yours; resist and break free or sit down and do nothing.

Other Articles Of Interest

Russians show patriotism on nuclear bunker tours (Jan 6, 2016)

Chinese firms extend Moscow’s rail networks (Jan 6, 2016)

Remaking Moscow lures more Chinese investment (Jan 6, 2016)

Syrian war profiteers: 15 companies that benefit (Dec 31)

Despite Challenges and Sanctions: Russian oil & gas remain profitable

China overtakes U.S. Now world.s largest Economy  (Dec 20)

Americans favour coffee to stock market investing  (Dec 17)

Sexy stocks beat boring bonds: suggested strategy (Dec 10)

China & South Africa Friendship with trade benefits  (Nov 3